- Nov 27, 2000
- 15,813
- 31,771
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Triple M commentary team
Muppets
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But how good was our booing as the umpires were leaving the ground
Totally agree. It's partly a matter of educating our young players so they know what the umps are instructed to pay ; and partly a matter of putting some heat on Gieschen & his geese to let them know they can't screw North & expect to get away with it.The umpiring was absolutely disgusting tonight, it was inconsistent and certainly didn't appear fair. Does anyone know how many goals came from Brisbane frees/50s and how many for us?
I hope the footy department is putting together a tape of a number of incidents that highlight the inconsitency (the incident when it was play on when Staker was tackled and then an instant later Spud is pinged holding the ball that resulted in a goal is a prime example) and that Eugene, JB, The Chief take it to Geesh and ask for detailed explanations on all the decisions.
North players were being pinged for HOB but Brisbane players weren't, North players were being penalised 50s for things that Brisbane players weren't.
There were also a number of holding the ball decisions paid against us where the contact looked very high - I thought the head was sacred. Seems like some heads are more sacred than others.
Even though Hale had an absolute shocker (and deserves to be dropped) there was an incident in the third quarter where he is going for the ball close to the goal square and his hand is grabbed by the defender clearly stopping his contest for the ball yet somehow the OPSM sponsored umpires were blind to it.
I haven't had the benefit of seeing a replay of any of the incidents - they are just the ones I can recall.
The umpiring was an absolute disgrace.
Was it really a handpass? I only saw it live, when it looked to be a blatant throw.The bizzare thing is that after we were crucified as much as I can remember, all the media can talk about is the incorrect free against Black. FFS.
Was it really a handpass? I only saw it live, when it looked to be a blatant throw.
If it was in fact a handpass : KARMA.
(And the demonstrative way he argued with the ump was clearly more worthy of a 50 than Pratt's comment.)
Yeah it was a handpass (saw it on Fox Sports Replay). Nice guess from our favourite umpire!
The whole handpass rule is a farce. Black definately used a throwing motion to propel that ball so far. It wasn't the impact from his fist that sent the ball so high and far.
But under the rules if your fist is touching the ball it seems it is legal to scoop or throw the ball. They may as well let guys use a two handed scoop if this type of action is allowed to pass as a handball.
Greenwood must have a horse shoe up his arse or something
The whole handpass rule is a farce. Black definately used a throwing motion to propel that ball so far. It wasn't the impact from his fist that sent the ball so high and far.
But under the rules if your fist is touching the ball it seems it is legal to scoop or throw the ball. They may as well let guys use a two handed scoop if this type of action is allowed to pass as a handball.