It’s based on the big dollars Port are offering, not that his GF lives there
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
It would be a massive loss, but if there's a few picks coming back it can really help balance our list.Don’t shoot the messenger, but hearing Port have made a massive offer to Dunkley and it’s looking likely to happen.
My view is you should do everything not to lose players like him and there is no promise we turn whatever picks into a list need. Things can change but at the moment it sounds like there is a fair difference in our offer vs theirs.It would be a massive loss, but if there's a few picks coming back it can really help balance our list.
Also helps with resigning smithy
I don't want to lose him either, how will it affect the bromance.My view is you should do everything not to lose players like him and there is no promise we turn whatever picks into a list need. Things can change but at the moment it sounds like there is a fair difference in our offer vs theirs.
Maybe we take over the whole league then? I reckon Liz Watson would be a decent cross-code import for the AFLW team too, pair her up with Ellie B and they'd cause havoc.or the Western Bulldogs should start it own Netball Team and apply for a licence with Netball Australia (if they are not broke)
If BF Port posters have any say in it, it will be to be captain-coach so they can jettison Hinkley!Don’t shoot the messenger, but hearing Port have made a massive offer to Dunkley and it’s looking likely to happen.
Your first name is not Andrew, is it??It’s based on the big dollars Port are offering, not that his GF lives there
I wouldn't be shocked if Dogs did that in the futureor the Western Bulldogs should start it own Netball Team and apply for a licence with Netball Australia (if they are not broke)
Not sure why people are even asking what players Port have in return for Dunkley should that rumour be proven true, it's basically irrelevant. It's exceedingly rare these days for clubs to swap players in a trade, even when picks are also involved. There is the odd 3 way trade for lower end players but almost never when someone of Dunkley's calibre is involved.
The only thing to be considered is what type of pick offering they could give in return.
Not Todd Marshall. I’ld take him.Theres honestly not a single player on that list that interests me to be completely honest - shocking list.
Reckon the need for a small lockdown defender is just as important. Duryea will be 32 for mosr of next year, will have been injured for large parts of all but one of our years, and a lot of the issues people have with our defence is simply by virtue of being forced to pick an attacking-minded defensive unit on form/availability.
Also, if we see Sam Darcy as more of a KPP than a ruck (likely), a third player that's a genuine first ruck is a need. Plenty of diretions we can go with the age, AFL experience etc. of that ruck.
Not Todd Marshall. I’ld take him.
I'm pretty confident to say we are taking SullivanMy guess is that we pick up Kellet as our traditional VFL rookie.
I'm pretty confident to say we are taking Sullivan
Agreed but Lachie brings a much-needed speed to our vfl midfieldI dunno, Sullivan would be McComb 2.0, Kellet is at least playing as a defender and they've talked about his defensive work in the post game reviews.
Well it’s clear that we have an agreement to take one Footscray player each year and there’s literally no one else that stands out. Maybe Van De Heuvel on a needs basis but I don’t think he’s up to it either.* me dead surely we’re not taking Sullivan lmao
We can’t possibly continue to take one Footscray player every year Id really be surprised if that was an actual agreement - if it is it’s a terrible oneWell it’s clear that we have an agreement to take one Footscray player each year and there’s literally no one else that stands out. Maybe Van De Heuvel on a needs basis but I don’t think he’s up to it either.
I’m surprised it hasn’t attracted us some better VFL players. An ‘agreement’ where we select one player onto the AFL list each year is fairly significant IMO.
We have the past 5 years despite there being some head scratches. We’ve picked up Gowers, Hayes, Gardner & McComb in the past 5 years. We didn’t take anyone in 2020 but had a severely compromised draft hand.We can’t possibly continue to take one Footscray player every year Id really be surprised if that was an actual agreement - if it is it’s a terrible one
We have the past 5 years despite there being some head scratches. We’ve picked up Gowers, Hayes, Gardner & McComb in the past 5 years. We didn’t take anyone in 2020 but had a severely compromised draft hand.
Yeah I don't buy dunks leaving at all interstate. His relationship with his family and adz is a big part of him and was the reason for not wanting to go to the swans when drafted.It would be devastating for Ads if Dunks left. They are virtually joined at the hip. Josh is also very close to his family, with family business interests, so a move interstate would be very odd.
It would be devastating for Ads if Dunks left. They are virtually joined at the hip. Josh is also very close to his family, with family business interests, so a move interstate would be very odd.