Did I say that?I assume you think the Herald Sun and Sky News are top of the line investigative companies then?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Did I say that?I assume you think the Herald Sun and Sky News are top of the line investigative companies then?
These things are rarely quick decisions though - I'm sure Brisbane and Port spent months working with Dunkley's management.They could make swift moves to accomodate. If they pushed enough players then they could go. Rankine, Bowes, Fiorini. Easily cut more space.
You're not denying it now. I assume you think the ABC is full of Woke Lefties who push their own agenda? It was the same as when they went through the historical child sexual assault story with us when it comes to these kinds of investigations they're more likely to do the hard yards to be right then first like the rest of the AFL media.Did I say that?
The codes of conduct are public documents (for my sins, I am intimately familiar with them).Ew, yeah I’m not going to touch that with a response on this forum.
Again, we should only comment when an investigation is complete.
It is believed the review was similar in scope to Collingwood's 'Do Better' review of 2021 and will have similarly dramatic ramifications.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Here's how I reckon that call would go;If I was Gold Coast I'd absolutely be contacting Dunkley's people. "Hey heard you like Queensland"
These things are rarely quick decisions though - I'm sure Brisbane and Port spent months working with Dunkley's management.
Dunkley's made his decision now he has to deal with the repercussions
They probably could but I doubt pick 7 will be on the table for Dunkley. They'd probably give what they get for Rankine plus maybe a player like Burgess or Corbett.They could make swift moves to accomodate. If they pushed enough players then they could go. Rankine, Bowes, Fiorini. Easily cut more space.
Yeah. That was a pretty unique situation, I'm not quite sure if the Dunkley situation is comparable.True. Can be done quickly though. Adzy case in point.
I'd expect they get Adelaide's pick 5 for Rankine, with later pick swaps to even the trade outThey probably could but I doubt pick 7 will be on the table for Dunkley. They'd probably give what they get for Rankine plus maybe a player like Burgess or Corbett.
Again, I’m not going to go into this further on here.You're not denying it now. I assume you think the ABC is full of Woke Lefties who push their own agenda? It was the same as when they went through the historical child sexual assault story with us when it comes to these kinds of investigations they're more likely to do the hard yards to be right then first like the rest of the AFL media.
Me neither but its what his current deal with Hawthorn is by reports.
Will be interesting how they react as a playing group now and if a few of them want to leaveYeah. That was a pretty unique situation, I'm not quite sure if the Dunkley situation is comparable.
If he does suddenly U-turn on the Brisbane deal I'd expect Port to be in the box seat.
It does change how we approach Brisbane though. Do we try and get a player & picks instead of just picks?
I do wonder whether we have been working on another player though and need Brissie's picks for that. We did seem to be linked to Brisbane picks only pretty quickly.
I’m not questioning the review.The codes of conduct are public documents (for my sins, I am intimately familiar with them).
We are commenting on an actual review commissioned by an external party, not a one-off allegation.
Only 100? Not even on the same planet.100x better than murdoch media journalism still.
Again, I’m not going to go into this further on here.
My bad, I shouldn’t have brought it up in the first place.
In this specific case, i'm not really sure what they AFL could have done. They got the report 2 weeks ago. They're hardly going to go rushing to the media without dotting the i's and crossing the t's.Hahaha the report today was an internal investigation and review. We can comment on this.
This "natural justice" bullshit Gil spouted and the minions are banging on about on SEN is a flog.
AFL house have been sitting on racism and dodgy behaviour in its entire existence.
I am supportive of this independent investigation because hopefully it will include all clubs and aspects of the AFL organisation BUT I am a little concerned with the AFL's hypocrisy on the matter.
Adam Goodes was not that long ago...
Griff was never a bad guy. He loved the club. He wore the fallout of Brendan McCartney. He netted us a premiership indirectly.I don’t bemoan someone taking the cash (although I dig nobility as the greatest “why”)
But
Dunkley is approaching Griffen levels of spoilt sh*tc*nt.
His camp were bitching about Sydney before he was drafted it, he slapped us in 2020 and his camp is allowing more slagging of us now. And it really sounds like he’s got the wrong people around him – built him up to be an entitled and selfish individual
Not possibleWould the club be happy to pay some salary for Dunkley to get the suns lower picks.
Is that possible?
I don’t bemoan someone taking the cash (although I dig nobility as the greatest “why”)
But
Dunkley is approaching Griffen levels of spoilt sh*tc*nt.
His camp were bitching about Sydney before he was drafted it, he slapped us in 2020 and his camp is allowing more slagging of us now. And it really sounds like he’s got the wrong people around him – built him up to be an entitled and selfish individual
Unfortunately, the ABC and good journalism don’t generally go hand in hand.
Whats your issue here champion?
Where was I putting words in his mouth? I gave him the right to deny he didn't take. People can have different opinions thats the point of this site is it not to debate differing opinions? Or do we all just have to think the same and agree with everything said?It’s pretty clear buddy/pal/chief.
You’ve put words into someone else’s mouth and only they are wise enough to just move along. You get into arguments with others all the time on here because nobody can have a different opinion to yours, and it’s tiresome