jmac70
On the porch
I doubt that.SEN suggested lot of Don's contracts haven't included the 20% pay rise.
Makes sense most of them banned before those negotions progressed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 10
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
I doubt that.SEN suggested lot of Don's contracts haven't included the 20% pay rise.
Makes sense most of them banned before those negotions progressed.
Terry W suggested this (I think this is it):No chance essendon will land Saad, Smith and Stringer. They have pick 11 and 27.
Given that Melbourne are actively encouraging Watts to look elsewhere and he's still pining for them in the media indicates to me he doesn't have the fire in the belly to really grab an opportunity elsewhere and will never fulfill his talent.
Buyer beware.
At the beginning of the night I don't really see too much difference.Hine did his best work when he was just focusing on identifying talent.
I'm glad we went back to the future (or is that forward to the past?).
Steele is suppoesdely on unders. You don't trade him out to fit someone into the salary cap.
Well we should be offering 10 mill over 6 years....as long as we can plan to afford it.
Certainly not.Joking yeah ?
And he is not worth it.Smith wants like 600k I don't think Pies can afford him.
If you're looking at bringing in free agents on big dollars to propel you to the promised land, good players on unders - which is what Steele supposedly is, are vital to have the cap space and the quality within the team to make the strategy work. They're worth their weight in gold.You do if it frees up $600k and he offers the best value of your mids. Unders or overs is irrelevant. For instance obviously clearing the decks of Mayne or Greenwood ticks one of the boxes, but not the second.
Pies will draft Coffield then sign Lynch and Sloane next year and win 2019 flag.
I still see a need for a clearence beastBut we don't need Sloane. He's a great player, but he's a midfielder of the type we have plenty of - to super fast, can get the ball, decent but not brilliant disposal.
Lynch would be awesome, but everyone will make a play for him.
Certainly not.
If you're looking at bringing in free agents on big dollars to propel you to the promised land, good players on unders - which is what Steele supposedly is, are vital to have the cap space and the quality within the team to make the strategy work. They're worth their weight in gold.
Should of Ebay'd it.Just heard about Jake Lever getting photographed dumping his crows gear in the tip haha
Have you actually thought this through?
Steele goes out, Sloane replaces him and we then invest the trade currency acquired from trading Steele in the draft to improve the overall quality. It's a surprisingly simple concept.
I can't believe I've been drawn into this. I'm not even interested in Sloane...
Do you not rate, Elliot, Fas, Daicos, Kirby, Sidey (should playing as a small forward prodomanently)Wouldn't touch Lynch if Darcy has a good year. Lynch will cost a fortune. Id rather get a few decent smalls.
Smith wants more midfield time we can't give him that
Do you not rate, Elliot, Fas, Daicos, Kirby, Sidey (should playing as a small forward prodomanently)
Rather we go to the draft...looking forward to McLarty playing seniors.Happy to let saints have Tomlinson. Offered 5 years at huge coin, plus GWS would want a high draft pick to let him go.....
Pass.
Have you actually thought this through?
Steele goes out, Sloane replaces him and we then invest the trade currency acquired from trading Steele in the draft to improve the overall quality. It's a surprisingly simple concept.
I can't believe I've been drawn into this. I'm not even interested in Sloane...
Of course it's ok with me. It is your life to live.