hvamaz
Rookie
Any more news on Tom Mitchell talks with Carlton?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Any more news on Tom Mitchell talks with Carlton?
Should be better than he is.What do people here think about Arryn Siposs?
He is on the outer at St Kilda and according to their board on the chopping block.
Has a long raking left foot on him, and is a good size (191 cm), would be a good cheap addition if they decide to let him go?
His ability has never been in question, mainly his effort so do we back Malthouse in?
The one thing Matlhouse wants above just about anything.....
Think you may have answered your own question just there C4
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yeah you're probably right, but surely effort is a result of coaching and mindset?
This is much easier to turn around than physical ability?
I'm hoping it's an outside running mid.I wonder what MS3's 2nd play is? I remember him saying that Boyd is 1 of 2...
He is under 1.90 metresThanks Sheik ...but, but.. but.. he is under 1.95m![]()
That's it, you'd imagine club would speak to plenty of players in any given year to see where their heads are at.We know that we've had words with Jaksch, at least.
Others have already been mentioned here.....but who knows......not everything will show up.
Wayne Carey said the Dogs recently offered Patton a 5m/5y contract and he knocked it back.
Interesting of true.
"Goddess"

"Goddess"

Current list of unrestricted free agents as of today 5/8/14 .............

How could you knock that back if you were Patton?
And I know the dogs desperately need a KPF (even more than us), but that's a massively dud deal if you ask me.
Patton is not a dominant power forward YET. He is a super promising kid, no doubt. And I reckon he will be a beauty. But that kind of money goes to a genuine superstar. Someone who is one of the best in the league and will give you top line performance from day one.
Even if Patton takes the competition by storm, it's unlikely to happen for 2-3 years (or more). So essentially you are paying him a few hundred grand a year to develop further in the next 3 years and then $1.5-$2m a year after that. Sheesh....

"Goddess"

"Goddess"

B: Enright - Frawley - Jamison
HB: Simpson - Henderson - Walker
C: Thomas - Sewell - Gibbs
HF: Goodes - Malceski - O'Keefe
F: Goldsack - Waite - Menzel
Fol: Kreuzer - Judd - Murphy
Int: Yarran - Boyd - Everitt - Giansiracusa (sub)
Looks like flag 17 and 18 to me
Unfortunately nobody will be left on the list afterwards....

Delusional Shan!![]()
CHF Malceski aside, that would actually be a darn good side.B: Enright - Frawley - Jamison
HB: Simpson - Henderson - Walker
C: Thomas - Sewell - Gibbs
HF: Goodes - Malceski - O'Keefe
F: Goldsack - Waite - Menzel
Fol: Kreuzer - Judd - Murphy
Int: Yarran - Boyd - Everitt - Giansiracusa (sub)
Looks like flag 17 and 18 to me
Unfortunately nobody will be left on the list afterwards....