Mega Thread Trade Targets 2014

[Jamie007]

Everyone except Carlton.

 

[fnm_just a man]

You left Hoskin-Elliott out?

You underestimate just how good WHE looks .. he or treloar would be my first pick of their crop

 

[Boltfromtheblue]

I feel like we've got something up our selves.

Most people with something up them selves are at Essendon*.

 

[Heres Waite]

I must have my headphones on back-to-front. I thought Terry said he actually rated the idea.

I think he hates it because he likes it. If that makes sense.

I mean he knows its good for Carlton so therefore hates it.

 

[HARKER]

Wow ... Terry hating our 3 for 1 scenerio. Saying that's an extra two spots on the list you have to find. Ha ha! Terry, we have already sacked Bootsma and Duigan retired before we even started delisting players.

Just for the record:

Duigan, Bootsma, Temay, McInnes, Waite & Garlett already off the senior list.
Robinson, Lucas and Warnock every chance to go
Scotland, Reynolds and Cachia gone from the rookie list.

That's 12 spots already that need filling.

 

[Blue Pulse]

He has changed his mind over the last 30 mins, he was just saying we could benefit from the 3 for 1 scenario after canning it not long ago.

He would be too gutless to say other wise after talking to McKay

 

[kjr8]

Whiley doesn't sound too bad....

Our midfield certainly needs some quality grunt.

Has he been injured? Don't know much about him besides he's played 10 games in 3 years?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[HARKER]

Apparently 21 is likely coming to us for Patfull according to this.

Just out of interest, if Robinson isn't traded, is he likely delisted or retained? From the sounds of Swann a few days ago, we'd take a good look at him as a DFA.

Fair point.

I actually think we'd be trying to squeeze the #40 from GWS and be done with it.

 

[Just Kreuzing]

Just for the record:

Duigan, Bootsma, Temay, McInnes, Waite & Garlett already off the senior list.
Robinson, Lucas and Warnock every chance to go
Scotland, Reynolds and Cachia gone from the rookie list.

That's 12 spots already that need filling.

And McLean about to go also...

 

[Aphrodite]

As if we couldn't pick that one coming.

How do we get so strongly attached to these players? Seriously.

Pretty sure I read somewhere that the Bulldogs offered him to us.

We never asked for him.

 

[HARKER]

And McLean about to go also...

.........and if the right offer comes for Watson he'll be gone also.

That's already a very possible 14 players.............and we haven't signed Ellard or White yet either.

 

[Gala_29]

Has he been injured? Don't know much about him besides he's played 10 games in 3 years?

Not that it's an easy task to break through to a team that's been given every good draft pick in the past 3 years.

 

[Just Kreuzing]

.........and if the right offer comes for Watson he'll be gone also.

That's already a very possible 14 players.............and we haven't signed Ellard or White yet either.

Which is why 3 for 1 offers will be appealing to us, particularly if it is an improvement on what we are losing or not offering contracts to in terms of ability and value for money.

 

[Kramer1]

Don't mind saying I'll be furious if we settle for Jaksch and 19. That's us taking a hit just so GWS can be profligate in their dealings with Hawthorn and the WB's. Wiley(?) would be delist material for a club under pressure to trim its list...adds nothing to the deal.

 

[HARKER]

Which is why 3 for 1 offers will be appealing to us, particularly if it is an improvement on what we are losing or not offering contracts to in terms of ability and value for money.

That's what Wallace didn't get until he spoke with McKay............and then he got it.

 

[Magruder]

If Jaksch has to be:

1. Jaksch & #19 & #21
2. Jaksch & #19 & a change of our second rounders (our #28 becomes #21)
3. Jaksch & McCarthy
4. Jaksch & #19 & #40 & Whiley/Sumner


Which is best?

I'd be angling for:

KJ, 19, 21 & Whiley

or equivalent.

Why not stretch it for a four for one?

 

[Beer n Skittles]

Apparently Whiley doesn't have a contract. GWS haven't offered him a new one

 

[Just Kreuzing]

That's what Wallace didn't get until he spoke with McKay............and then he got it.

Wallace talks too much and confuses himself, needs to listen more, any wonder his 5 year plan stuffed up...

 

[HARKER]

I'd be angling for:

KJ, 19, 21 & Whiley or equivalent.

Why not stretch it for a four for one?

Would love that #21 but as someone else has put forward, that may well be set aside for Patfull

Even if it's the #40, it may be O.K......................................and we let the baker bake the bread.

 

[etsal1]

Just for the record:

Duigan, Bootsma, Temay, McInnes, Waite & Garlett already off the senior list.
Robinson, Lucas and Warnock every chance to go
Scotland, Reynolds and Cachia gone from the rookie list.

That's 12 spots already that need filling.

Add Brock.

 

[Just Kreuzing]

Apparently Whiley doesn't have a contract. GWS haven't offered him a new one

PSD then...

 

[kjr8]

Not that it's an easy task to break through to a team that's been given every good draft pick in the past 3 years.

The good ones can/do..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[HARKER]

Wallace talks too much and confuses himself, needs to listen more, any wonder his 5 year plan stuffed up...

Pretty pointless having a 5 year plan, when you can't see the year right in front of you.

 

[Crippa16]

Can Mark Whiley kick ? If he can't kick the a big fat NO !!!!!!!!!!

 

[Magruder]

He has changed his mind over the last 30 mins, he was just saying we could benefit from the 3 for 1 scenario after canning it not long ago.

Classic Wallace. Have a bet each way claim to be right in two to three years when KJ is holding down CHB, Whiley and #19 are decent best 22 types.

Can also say he was against the deal if it goes wrong.