Bojan KantKick
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2014
- Posts
- 31,209
- Reaction score
- 29,715
- Location
- UK
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Manchester United
Seems like a win to me. If he keeps Leicester up who cares if they have to sell him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Soccer Notice Image
FA Cup Semi-Finals ⚽ 2026 FIFA Series A - Socceroos friendlies ⚽ Europa - Rd of 16 ⚽ The Matildas x 2026 Womens Asia Cup ⚽ Conference League - KNOCKOUTS! ⚽ Conference League - Rd of 16 ⚽ Socceroos Internat'l Friendlies ⚽ Champs League - League Phase ⚽
Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 5
SuperCoach Rd 5 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 5 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Capt/VC
Nek minit he dominates and Leicester don't want to sell him or sell him to highest bidder.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
They get a striker that's banging in the goals, at a time they're fighting to stay up.Just not sure what leicester get out of that arrangement. I don't think chelsea can front any of the cash formthe transfer or wages as that woukd be illegal. They get the guarantee maybe of a sale price if it doesnt work out at Leicester, but they lose the chance of a player, or bigger profit if it's a success.
Can't see why leicester wouldnt just buy him themselves with no involvement from chelsea.
But they are paying for the player. How is Chelsea scratching Leicesters back?They get a striker that's banging in the goals, at a time they're fighting to stay up.
It's that simple. Leicester scratch Chelsea's back, Chelsea does the same.
They are effectively being 'loaned' the player by Chelsea, completely legally. When he goes to Chelsea from Leicester, you can bet the sale value will be inflated above what it should be. Not much, just enough for Chelsea to say "thanks, you did the right thing, so will we, let's do business again some time".But they are paying for the player. How is Chelsea scratching Leicesters back?
If Chelsea are funding or part funding the transfer it's illegal. If Chelsea are funding or part funding wages it's illegal.
Leicester could buy the player and insert a release clause that anyone could take up to encourage him to come, just don't see why chelsea would be involved.
Leicester could buy the player and insert a release clause that anyone could take up to encourage him to come, just don't see why chelsea would be involved.
Looks like Shaqiri back on the agenda for Liverpool.
I think this is it. Kramaric wants to be at Chelsea and wants a guarantee that for 2015/16 he's a Chelsea player.I guess because the player really wants to end up at Chelsea for some reason. He's happy to go their for 6 months as long as he ends up at the Bridge in the summer.
isn't he off to Milan?Will Liverpool release Suso now or wait till June?
Probably depends on Shaqiri?
Then I hope he just signs for Chelsea. I don't want a player on the books that wants to be elsewhere.I think this is it. Kramaric wants to be at Chelsea and wants a guarantee that for 2015/16 he's a Chelsea player.
But they are paying for the player. How is Chelsea scratching Leicesters back
isn't he off to Milan?
Except that this is not the case at all, lmao.Amazing that this is all happening because you won't meet the 9mil we bid for him. Who knew you lot were tight asses.