SugarShane
C12 H22 O11
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2007
- Posts
- 23,870
- Reaction score
- 41,394
- Location
- SA
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Strikers, BMS Goats
This was the issue. In the exact same game, 2 other umpires found the free kicks to be exactly 50/50. Don't know if they paid 6-6 and 5-5 or 6-5 and 5-6 or whatever, but their combined opinion was both teams infringed equally.Just to clarify, I accept shit umpiring but absolutely loathe biased/cheating ones.
Shit umpiring = both teams get bad calls in similar amounts.
Biased/cheating umpiring = the bad calls are heavily skewed in favor of one team over the other. 17-1 isn’t just the issue with that Pannell game, but how many frees that were not called for us? Say Pannell had not called about 3-5 for us, this roughly translates to 95% favouritism to one team.
In most average games, even though there will likely be an imbalance, the free kick count might be skewed, but very very rarely more than 70%.
So how did we only switch to playing a game style where we commit 17x the amount of infringements when one umpire was looking?





