Troy Simmonds Vs Brad Ottens

[The Dice Man]

Based on 2005 averages, this isnt to bag Ottens, but merely to compare the two players outputs considering they have played similar roles for their clubs this year, and that Simmonds comes at $150,000+ cheaper than Ottens.

Troy Simmonds 	Name 	Brad Ottens
Richmond 	Team 	Geelong
125 	Career Games 	144
196 cm 	Height 	202 cm
99 kg 	Weight 	105 kg
21 	2005 Games 	15
13.3 	Disposals 	11.2
9.3 	Kicks 	5.4
3.5 	Long Kicks 	2.9
5.7 	Marks 	4.6
1.0 	Contested Marks 	1.3
4.0 	Handballs 	5.8
1.6 	Tackles 	2.2
0.9 	Goals 	1.5
1.1 	Behinds 	0.8
1.1 	Frees For 	1.2
1.0 	Frees Against 	1.5
12.9 	Hitouts 	11.3
1.9 	First Possessions 	1.7
2.1 	Clearances 	0.5
3.1 	Inside 50s 	1.0
0.6 	Rebound 50s 	0.3
1.8 	Contested Possessions 	3.3
10.3 	Uncontested Possessions 	7.3
1.8 	1%ers 	1.8
3.3 	Errors 	3.5
0 	Bounces 	0

 

[worthy]

Interesting, Ottens has played most of the year under some form of injury duress and he still compares reasonably to snake.

 

[thehoff]

Brad Ottens easily!

Hardly played a game fully fit and still is relatively even with Simmonds.

 

[The Dice Man]

Interesting, Ottens has played most of the year under some form of injury duress and he still compares reasonably to snake.

Ottens plays every year under some form of injury duress.

 

[local]

Ottens stats aren’t too bad for someone who has been injured. Ottens has played the last 2-3 season carrying injuries.
But Simmonds is the clear winner. I would pick a fit player over an injury plagued player any day. Get more value.