Nostradumbass
BigFooty Legend
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2007
- Posts
- 53,623
- Reaction score
- 131,348
- Location
- Willy back beach
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Everton FC Williamstown FC
What happened at the end? I missed it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Refreshing to see a game spared from incompetent umpiring that conspires to Rort the result , no overturned goals from bs reasons , no 50m or deliberates missed , remarkable really felt like I was watching a different game
Plus the hold on gray deep inside 50 and the free to Tuohy at Geelongs half forward lineYou
You serious. Port were robbed.
How many throws? That play on against Dixon never gets paid. What a time to pull that out.
Plus the hold on gray deep inside 50 and the free to Tuohy at Geelongs half forward line
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I only watched the last 3min , well that's good to know then we re not only pc .You
You serious. Port were robbed.
How many throws? That play on against Dixon never gets paid. What a time to pull that out.
Refer to my comment aboveWas the last goal touched?
Boltons was inconclusive cos it was a blur of hands and ball , nowhere ****en near clear enough to make a decisionThe influence of umpires is really starting to P* me off. Well, it always has, but worse this year. Port got a really rough deal. Almost ironically, did anyone think the Danger goal looked about as conclusive as the Bolton 'goal'? Danger's likely wasn't touched, and Shai's was likely touched, issue i have with it is the field umpires have called goal in both instances. 3rd umpire needs to be 100% certain........ I should just get over it i guess.....
Boltons was inconclusive cos it was a blur of hands and ball , nowhere ****en near clear enough to make a decision
gws bloke's finger moved clearly touchedBoltons was inconclusive cos it was a blur of hands and ball , nowhere ****en near clear enough to make a decision
gws bloke's finger moved clearly touched
but....... called a goal by the goal umpire 99 times out of 100 it doesnt get overuled
Show us the frame you're referring , is it clear or a blur . If it's a blur , you think you saw it , it's the mind playing tricks like an oasis in the desertgws bloke's finger moved clearly touched
but....... called a goal by the goal umpire 99 times out of 100 it doesnt get overuled
You're right seems exactly kind of stunt they'd pull on usHopefully Port sucked up all of the arse luck 50 / 50's that go against someone for this round so that we might actually get a fair shake this week.
That Dixon 30 sec call could so easily been one of our guys Sat night.
Coz the message has gone out , don't be a bunch of ********s and make a conclusive decision on a blurWhy wasn't the Geelong goal reviewed?
Coz the message has gone out , don't be a bunch of ********s and make a conclusive decision on a blur


