God, I hope so.
Vent Thread
- Thread starter Cake
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
God, I hope so.
Aww hell no!
If Curnow gets omitted, then i will have two donuts in the midfield.
Off The Couch
TheBrownDog
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2007
- Posts
- 52,949
- Reaction score
- 72,917
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
I reckon it would be Duigan before Curnow - he will need to shore up his defence and will bring in Bower. That's the only change I see as they were as the article said pretty competitive on a whole and I cannot see anyone else that will add anything substantial that isn't already there.
I doubt it will be Duigan. He was one of their better player last week and will continue to improve. Players in danger are Watson, Collins, and Laidler.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Bloke at work who can't understand that with different captain choices, you only get the difference between the players not 2x the difference...annoying as f*ck. I even went to the effort of writing down for him to understand and he still says 'had i chose him as capt i'd have gotten an extra 80 pts (rather than 40)'....drives me crazy.
Benatration
Club Legend
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2010
- Posts
- 1,199
- Reaction score
- 2
- Location
- Canberra
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- GWS Giants, Mercedes GP
That pisses me off too
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2004
- Posts
- 24,216
- Reaction score
- 198
- Location
- Adelaide
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Baltimore Ravens & Chicago Bulls
Lulz I love people like that. There was one guy I knew last year playing for the first time. At the start of the season he thought he had to trade first thing Monday morning in case everyone else got the player before he did, he didn't realise there was no limit to the number of teams who could have that player. 
You'll be pleased when this guy gets drafted.
http://www.afl.com.au/tabid/208/default.aspx?newsid=106992
Off The Couch
TheBrownDog
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2007
- Posts
- 52,949
- Reaction score
- 72,917
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Krakeour is a bit of a disappointment - if you can't get a touch in a game against the tigers atm then it's a bit of a worry.
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2004
- Posts
- 24,216
- Reaction score
- 198
- Location
- Adelaide
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Baltimore Ravens & Chicago Bulls
****ing Didak! Couldn't have stayed shit for the rest of this game and not explode in the last quarter?
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2008
- Posts
- 9,158
- Reaction score
- 6,177
- Location
- Adelaide
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Golden State Warriors
Krakouer!@! thought i'd have a little faith in him and start him on the field again this week, (despite his last 2 bad scores), while Jack Darling has been sitting on my bench as emergency 4 weeks in a row now. next week, he is getting benched or traded (he's barely breaking even, BE 39).
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2004
- Posts
- 30,913
- Reaction score
- 17,678
- Location
- Melbourne
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Arsenal FC
- Banned
- #442
That's ****ing 3 weeks in a row. Take out his third qtr in round one and he'd have scored sub-50 in every game. What's his B/E next week?
If it's under 60, benching him then ditching him for Tapscott (who has the bye). He's rubbish.
If it's under 60, benching him then ditching him for Tapscott (who has the bye). He's rubbish.
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2008
- Posts
- 9,158
- Reaction score
- 6,177
- Location
- Adelaide
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Golden State Warriors
Krak's BE next week is 39. considering his scores have been 48, 48 and 40 the last 3 weeks, there is no guarantee that he will even breakeven. considering his form, he may even be dropped from the team. either way, if he isn't going to increase in price anymore, he would've become a failed cash cow (that's why i bought him) and it'll be time to go.
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2004
- Posts
- 30,913
- Reaction score
- 17,678
- Location
- Melbourne
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Arsenal FC
- Banned
- #444
Yeah, I'd have just ditched him next week but Tapscott has the bye. What is his B/E? Would be a bonus if I actually make some cash from it.
I have enough $$$ to upgrade Krak to a forward premium but they are so volatile this season and would rather focus on the mids first.
I have enough $$$ to upgrade Krak to a forward premium but they are so volatile this season and would rather focus on the mids first.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2007
- Posts
- 2,000
- Reaction score
- 526
- Location
- Perth, Western Australia
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Banned
- #445
Traded out Conca. I didn't like that negative back pocket role he had, and he gets put in the middle tonight and gets 87 and goes up 15K 
Apart from Krakouer though, it was a decent night.
Apart from Krakouer though, it was a decent night.
Trading in Didak and Chapman is probably going to be one of the more awkward aspects of DT this year. And to think I had them both in my original plan team... damn.
PepperShaker
Cancelled
Traded out Conca. I didn't like that negative back pocket role he had, and he gets put in the middle tonight and gets 87 and goes up 15K
Apart from Krakouer though, it was a decent night.
Did that one last week. Wish it was Krak instead. Played like he was broken (ahahahaha Krak, broken, I'll stop now).
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2008
- Posts
- 9,158
- Reaction score
- 6,177
- Location
- Adelaide
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Golden State Warriors
yep, halfway through second quarter and Darling (on my bench) has surpassed Krakouer's score. will upgrade Krakouer to a premium next week.
EDIT, and Darling finishes on 100.
EDIT, and Darling finishes on 100.
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2004
- Posts
- 9,275
- Reaction score
- 7,074
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Haha, burnt.
I still have Bruce. Want to give him some time before I make decisions on him.
Furious at Buddy, though. Have him in my team and he finally pulls his finger out, 'cept it's against the Eagles.
- Status
