Votes Rnd 4 -v- Saint Kilda (Donkey vote??)

[BeinPurplenGreen]

In IP's absence, I'll try to get some votes from youse Freo faithful...

(BTW, trust IP to have the good fortune to miss our worst defeat of the last 13 years - some people have all the judgement...)

Post votes in here - but no discussion please - use the other threads for that.

Gunyungun votes for this round are Stephen Hill and Nick Suban.

FFCBFPOTY gets voted on as 5-4-3-2-1 votes if you feel they were among our best 5 players on the ground.

Gunyungun gets 2-1 votes, or 2-0, or 2-1, if you think they all played well and deserve recognition. Or nothing for nobody if they sucked.

Thanks.

 

[BeinPurplenGreen]

4. Chris Tarrant
3. Byron Schammer (apart from the brain snap that will see him suspended)
2. Paul Haselby
1. Paul Duffield

 

[Chops_a_must]

2 - Schammer (purely on effort)
1 - Duffman (purely on effort)

.05 - Sandi (for that chase - at least he tried to lift us)

Negative 50 votes for everyone else...

No young guys deserve votes...

 

[The Night Shift]

I just cannot award complete points for this round.
5.---------------
4.---------------
3. Paul Duffield
2. Chris Tarrant
1. The Schaminator

.... splitting hairs here

2. Suban
1. Hill

 

[samseenee]

5 - Cheer Squad
4 - Tram Driver
3 - Bag checking lady
2 - Duffield
1 - Taz

BYG
2 - Kid with Freo face paint
1 - Suban

 

[Scham]

5. pass
4. Duff
3. Scham
2. Hayden
1. Grover

 

[Split Personality]

5. Meh
4. Meh
3. Haselby
2. Tarrant
1. Duffield

BYB
2. Suban
1. Hill

 

[freocuz]

Along the same lines.

5 -
4 -
3 -
2 Haselby
1 Duffield

BYB -

 

[Doctor J]

5. Hasleby - cream rises to the top - didn't put a foot wrong
4. Schammer - worked very hard, esp getting into space - our highest priority
3. Duffield - cleaned up a lot of other guys's messes
2. Tarrant - solid, if not spectacular
1. Sandilands - did all he could

BYB

2. Suban - solid under a lot of pressure
1. Hill - try to take the game on, but not enough support

 

[brose]

4 duff
3 haze
2 schammer
1 m johnson

even those four weren't all that good.

 

[MadMac]

4. M Johnno
3. Taz
2. Duff
1. Schammster


BYB

1. Suban [just for the sake of it]

 

[Plugga]

5 -
4 -
3 Scahmmer
2 Johnson
1 Grover

BYB
-

 

[PapaJ]

5. Duff man - I actually thought his ball use was relatively good
4. Grover - had to do a lot of work due to inept freo midfield work
3. Schammer - worked hard, but still looked in a different league compared to the Saints mids
2. Haze
1. Pav - didn't have it near enough, but was very good when he did get half a chance and our top scorer with 7 points

Best Youngins

2 points for my 2 year old daughter catching a few minutes before bedtime exclaimed "They're silly" (was the most accurate thing I'd heard all night).

 

[yakamoto]

5. Johnson
4. Schammer
3. Duffield
2. Haselby
1. Pavlich

 

[DOCKER MAN]

5. Shammer
4. Duffield
3. Tarrant
2. Hayden
1. Sandilands (for that spectacular chase, provided a rare highlight)

 

[toenail11]

5-Schammer
4- Hase
3-Duffman
2-MJ
1-Sandi

 

[estibador]

5 -
4 -
3 - Schammer
2 - Hase
1 - Duff

If Taz played the whole game down back I probably would have given him votes too. We're finally on a good thing but we keep throwing him back up forward. It's like Harvey is deliberately trying to never give the team a chance to gel.

BYB
1 - Hill
1 - Suban

 

[E Shed]

5. Duff
4. Haze
3. Grover
2. Jonno
1. Scham

BYB
2. Hill - His effort put others to shame
1. Suban - Gutsy but took a while to adjust to the pressure then did ok.

 

[Freo_4eva]

5 - Haselby
4 - Johnson
3 - Schammer
2 - Pavlich
1 - Tarrant

BYB

Suban - 2
Hill - 1

 

[bigkev bleeds purple]

5 votes: Paul Duffield
4 votes: Byron Schammer
3 votes: Paul Hasleby
2 votes: Dean Solomon
1 vote: Chris Tarrant

No BYB votes.

 

[bigkev bleeds purple]

Which means...

7 - Paul Duffield (53)
6 - Byron Schammer (49)
5 - Paul Hasleby (42)
4 - Michael Johnson (22)
4 - Chris Tarrant (22)
2 - Antoni Grover (13)
1 - Roger Hayden (7)

Matthew Pavlich (4)
Aaron Sandilands (3)
Dean Solomon (2)
Brett Peake (1)

BYB

2 - Nick Suban (10)
1 - Stephen Hill (6)

 

[Ripper]

5: Duffman
4: Grover
3: Rodger
2: M.J.
1: Hase

I have given the defenders votes because despite the ball coming in so often on the turnover , it was a respectable effort to keep the Saints score to ( a few soft goals inflated) 116 points.

 

[silverscope]

5.
4.
3. Paul Hasleby
2. Chris Tarrant
1. Brett Peake

(for what its worth i didn't vote schammer purely because the whole game i don't think he ever went the first option, one example was Hase screaming at him from 30-40 metres out and had plenty of time to kick it to him but didnt.... instead kicked it to a 50/50 which we lost and then saints went on to score a goal from that possesion....)

No BYB.

Oh... Hill needs to work on his defensive side... i think atleast 75% of the time Gram (his opponent) got it Hill was about 20 metres away from him and then proceeded to chase him to no avail... happened alot.

 

[bigkev bleeds purple]

5: Duffman
4: Grover
3: Rodger
2: M.J.
1: Hase

I have given the defenders votes because despite the ball coming in so often on the turnover , it was a respectable effort to keep the Saints score to ( a few soft goals inflated) 116 points.

You're lucky I like you Rip (and also that I saw your votes would give the Duffman maximum points for this week, like he deserves... no offence, Byron). I'll edit the scores to reflect these.

 

[bigkev bleeds purple]

Oh crikey, stop it you mob... Stop it!!!