Hotpiescoldbeers
Team Captain
Look at the bright side, just put money on the oppositions small forwards to carve us up every week!! Easy money!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 14
SuperCoach Rd 14 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 14 AFF Trades - AFF Talk - Capt/VC
Yes you'd have to say that Mick has a lot to answer for walking out on the club the way he did and refusing to mentor Bucks as he signed up to do. We are now in a position with a coach who has pretty much had to learn from scratch without the benefit of that mentoring and in the face of his predecessor doing all that he could to sabotage relationships with the players. Thank god he's now at Carlton is all I can say.
Now that is really clutching at straws PieNSauce. If Bucks was hired on the proviso that he needed mentoring from Malthouse (no other senior coach with experience i.e. Eade) then he was not ready to coach full stop.
Everyone on this board knows that you think the whole succession plan was a mistake. Fair enough. But it cannot be changed now. What good does it serve to constantly bring it up? If you think that there are areas of Buck's coaching that need to be improved then say so. At least then we might be able to have a constructive conversation.
Yes you'd have to say that Mick has a lot to answer for walking out on the club the way he did and refusing to mentor Bucks as he signed up to do. We are now in a position with a coach who has pretty much had to learn from scratch without the benefit of that mentoring and in the face of his predecessor doing all that he could to sabotage relationships with the players. Thank god he's now at Carlton is all I can say.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I think my post was relevant to what was said?
The alarm bells should have been ringing when Bucks said it not the coaches job to motivate players, only to merely instruct them.
Lucky to make the 8 at this rate
Disturbing trend of just throwing in the towel when it is too hard
And there we have it. Malthouse was totally uncompromising when it came to the execution of a plan. You did what he said, winning or losing or it it was GTFO! Don't go up the guts because we don't have the talent to do that. Out of his mouth. Remember his love for big arse mids who would get smashed by faster mids? Took him a while and a few early operations in 2005 to give that one away, if you know what I mean?
Last night I felt crook when watching the first quarter but I also remember seeing that quite a few times during Malthouse's reign. Remember the words " WTF is he doing leaving X there, why the f... Would you hit the boundary when here are blokes free in the guts, why do we keep going to the pockets, when we need goals?"
Many in this forum would have been talking about the simplicity of the boundary gameplan and a lack of plan B until we took the flag in 2010. All of a sudden, MM is a genius. In all honesty, MM's plan was exposed in the drawn GF and the Saints were knackered in the second. Credit to whoever got the Pies up for the replay and it wasn't gameplan or coaching. Business end of 2011 and we fell over.
I agree with have some major issues with our game style and effort right now but lets not be too dramatic. Collingwood have hardly lost a game for the past 3-4 years and so we are not used to it. Its just a momentum thing. It may not be this year that we make a play for the flag but its doesn't mean we won't challenge for the next few.
One thing I would like to see is for us to be less Cloke centric going forward. In understand he is our standealone target but we there too often. Elliot, Lynch etc have marking ability.
Upside from tonight was I thought Josh Thomas & Seedsman outshone most of our stars. Promising for when the stars get their form back.
We'll have some great wins this season.
As it stands now Collingwood struggle to shut sides down who burn through the middle. Lack of leg speed and inability to win one on ones throughout the ground. Hawthorn and Geelong are great at it but their risk of getting torched on the rebound is negated by their half back lines. Gibson, Birchall, Stratton, Lake, Enright, Taylor, Mackie, Bartel (when he is back) Lonergan is basically how both teams generate attack.
Getting players back will help as we win more cleaces with Ball, Beams and more 50-50 ball. That means we don't get vaporised through the corridor. Still need to fix entries going into 50 and spread the opposition defence otherwise against the good teams it will be a game of ping pong. Still scope for improvement and the problems are not insurmountable.
Heath Shaw is one of the better one on one players in the league. Ben Reid outmarked a lot of Freo players last night. He looked reasonably composed during the night. Nathan Brown looked mismatched against Chris Mayne at times. I think he competed ok but Mayne is quicker off the mark. I think the side is missing Toovs. Freo kicked only 15 goals didnt they? Most of them came from Collingwood errors.
As for leg speed in the backline, have a look at Hawthorn and Geelong. Jimmy bartel isnt going to win a stawell gift. Neither is that ex-baldie at Hawthorn. I think its true that we might lack some zip around the ground but other teams are going to have similar problems covering fast breaks if their forwards and mids dont do their job.
I'll be bumping this thread if we get over Geelong next week. Honestly, never seen so many sorry-arsed, negative throwing-in-the-towel comments ever. If it wasn't indicated you would swear this is a Richmond thread.
If the players give up as easily as most of you guys have, we are gawn.
I'll be bumping this thread if we get over Geelong next week. Honestly, never seen so many sorry-arsed, negative throwing-in-the-towel comments ever. If it wasn't indicated you would swear this is a Richmond thread.
If the players give up as easily as most of you guys have, we are gawn.
I'll be bumping this thread if we get over Geelong next week. Honestly, never seen so many sorry-arsed, negative throwing-in-the-towel comments ever. If it wasn't indicated you would swear this is a Richmond thread.
If the players give up as easily as most of you guys have, we are gawn.
But the list is neither strong or fully fit at the moment nor settled.4 wins 3 losses with a list as strong as ours is very disturbing. top 4 is looking a distant target.
My biggest worry is how ugly we are to watch. Watching Geelong, Hawthorn, essendon, & Sydney is a pleasure. But watching us crab walk it out of defence sideways and backwards, only to blast it high, long, and not very handsome inside 50 won't win a game against a top side. Our game plan is flawed, our players attitudes seem poor, and we won't finish top 10 at this rate. Even if we do hit a winning streak, our percentage has taken such a hit that we need big wins, and plenty of them. Something we just haven't done under Bucks.
I'm not giving up on us yet, but I need to see a spark, and soon. Otherwise, Paul Roos, what are you doing for the next 5 years??? Would you like a job???