Ghostwriter
Cancelled
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2002
- Posts
- 16,990
- Reaction score
- 2,162
- Location
- Petrie Motlop sponsor '03
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Too good, Craig gave Laidley a football lesson today, in a word - clinical.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
You are obviously a good sport, jozeph. Thanks for the thoughts. Same goes for other Roos fans, good stuff people.jozeph said:Too good, Craig gave Laidley a football lesson today, in a word - clinical.
Yes well as you can see ,we're here ,and not actually waiting on the excuses.Mind you ,in defence of Laidley (no such thing) ,but for the sake of an argument ,it could be worse.He could be Malthouse and start reciting 16th century literature to divert the result.Maybe he should.ok.crows said:You are obviously a good sport, jozeph. Thanks for the thoughts. Same goes for other Roos fans, good stuff people.
Such a pity I can't say the same about "the Crows can't play any better than that" Laidley.

did he say that today?.. or was it from last year (..or the year before).. i can just remember that he said something bad about adelaide - and turns out that this board's favorite sports writer had just misquoted it.ok.crows said:Such a pity I can't say the same about "the Crows can't play any better than that" Laidley.
It was from our narrow win round five last year. And it's probably about time ok.crows got over it.lozstar said:did he say that today?.. or was it from last year (..or the year before).. i can just remember that he said something bad about adelaide - and turns out that this board's favorite sports writer had just misquoted it.
Dandy_GO said:Thanks guys - must admit I was a bit worried at half time - your mob looked great in the second quarter. You'll bounce back - I'll be very surprised if the roos are still bottom four at the end of the season.
I see.RogerRabbit69 said:Cheers ... shame Mark73 made such a tool of himself on other boards.


Thats pretty much how all our opponants end up playing against us,we have an unique ability to shut you down and make you hesitate.Tas said:If we played aggressive attacking football we would have had a chance, this slow, wide, over-possession ball is just leading us to a slow painful death.
mark73 said:I see.
What is a tool anyway? I was always of the opinion it was something that you kept in the shed.Or have we become even more Americanised?
PS : Where did I make a uh hum..."tool" of myself by the way?

Only takes a quick click on your username to uncover plenty of misdemeanours.mark73 said:What is a tool anyway? I was always of the opinion it was something that you kept in the shed.Or have we become even more Americanised?
PS : Where did I make a uh hum..."tool" of myself by the way?
rayven said:Thats pretty much how all our opponants end up playing against us,we have an unique ability to shut you down and make you hesitate.
Only 1 side this year have we had trouble with in doing this and on the ladder they are right up our clacker.
Well if I may approach the bench your honor...RogerRabbit69 said:Only takes a quick click on your username to uncover plenty of misdemeanours.
No you called me a tool because its a word used here often....Tool.Tooooool.TOOL!! Tool? You are a tool.It is a tool.I am a tool.I've never had that much interest in the garden shed myself.Only when doing the garden.I called you a tool because I thought it was less offensive than f.ckwit.
Awww thats sweet....I'm glad you think that much of me to form an opinion.Sorry I couldn't return the favour.But have it your way .... you're a f.ckwit.
You're welcome. Anyway, shouldn't you be off 'buttf.cking' - as you so eloquently put it - someone (or thing)?mark73 said:Awww thats sweet....I'm glad you think that much of me to form an opinion.
Nah Melbourne chicks couldn't hold a candle to Adelaide chicks my man.Should consider yourself a lucky lil' digger.RogerRabbit69 said:You're welcome. Anyway, shouldn't you be off 'buttf.cking' - as you so eloquently put it - someone (or thing)?
