- Joined
- Jan 26, 2006
- Posts
- 40,121
- Likes
- 30,969
- Location
- Perth
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- East Fremantle
But then, how easy does the clue have to be?
Because if it's only one clue, then I'm thinking the clue should be a name on a platter type clue, which seems bullshit.
But if a clue is hard, and you only get one per game, it seems a bit useless.
Because if it's only one clue, then I'm thinking the clue should be a name on a platter type clue, which seems bullshit.
But if a clue is hard, and you only get one per game, it seems a bit useless.
My view is that if the clue is going to suggest someone is innocent- then it can be direct. Otherwise you need to leave room for the evil to be able to argue themselves out of it.
Like lets say the clue is about the wereboncer and you are are the wereboncer.
There are 15 players left and 4 West Coast Wonders. A clue that the GF is wonderful is still useful but still gives the GF some room to survive

