Good to know they have some rule on it, even though its unlikely that it ever is used
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
with real guns**** the flip of a coin, make it a shoot out
Even better.with real guns
The team more universally liked; right now its 50/50.So what if us and Gold Coast both finish on the same win/loss/draw ratio AND the same percentage? Who gets pick 1?
The team more universally liked; right now its 50/50.
So if I'm interpreting this correctly, it seems that games between the clubs are used first, then if still tied, the %'s from these games, then in the extremely unlikely scenario of still being tied, they essentially draw it out of a hat.
You get equal custody. You each get to play the pick every other game.So what if us and Gold Coast both finish on the same win/loss/draw ratio AND the same percentage? Who gets pick 1?
I would not be surprised if the post-R23 bye is scrapped after this year. It doesn't achieve what the AFL thought it would. For example, if the Bulldogs are stuck in 7th, or at least, they can't move up, they will most likely rest players and not send them to Perth. It doesn't particularly matter if they have to play the following week or not, although it may not be ideal for some players to have 2 weekends without footy. But if a player has a minor yet legitimate injury, they will probably be rested, but would play if it was a final rather than a rather meaningless dead H&A match.
So Points For is never a factor? Not during the season, nor at the end of the season? Was it ever a way of separating teams on the ladder?
Ladder prior to end of season:
- Premiership Points, then Percentage, then Alphabetical
Ladder at end of season:
- Premiership Points, then Percentage, then Head to Head Premiership Points, then Head to Head Percentage, then "Drawing of Lots"
That all sound correct?
i would think the AFL may opt for a play off between the two... easy to do if they stick with this bye round before the finals.... again, unlikely for this scenario to ever happen... % is a virtually flawless tie breaker
I would not be surprised if the post-R23 bye is scrapped after this year. It doesn't achieve what the AFL thought it would. For example, if the Bulldogs are stuck in 7th, or at least, they can't move up, they will most likely rest players and not send them to Perth. It doesn't particularly matter if they have to play the following week or not, although it may not be ideal for some players to have 2 weekends without footy. But if a player has a minor yet legitimate injury, they will probably be rested, but would play if it was a final rather than a rather meaningless dead H&A match.
So if I'm interpreting this correctly, it seems that games between the clubs are used first, then if still tied, the %'s from these games, then in the extremely unlikely scenario of still being tied, they essentially draw it out of a hat.
If for example both teams were on 100%, then It goes buy alphebetical order. So if it was Essendon and Richmond, Essendon would get threw because E is before R. Or is this not the way it's done!?
No, they're not. Adelaide is 0.0001269862% ahead of Port. Most ladders only display one decimal place.Adelaide and Port Adelaide both currently tied on percentage