Remove this Banner Ad

What Twenty/20 is Doing to Cricket

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

magic_johnson!

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 7, 2008
Posts
6,731
Reaction score
1,828
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Geelong
Twenty/20 cricket has brought a lot to the cricketing world in both money and crowds. Crowds have been up both nationally and internationally across the world. The highlight crowd wise of the cricket season is always the twenty/20 games. On the first of February, 2008, a sell out crowd of 84,041 attended the match between Australia and India at the Melbourne Cricket Ground. Another match on the ninth of January, 2006, was viewed by 38,894 people at the Gabba. This is the fourth biggest Gabba attendance ever.

Domestic cricket worldwide has really taken off as a result of twenty/20 cricket. Once rarely watched leagues are now back page news and new leagues are coming thick and fast. Australia’s twenty/20 domestic league the “KFC Twenty/20 Big Bash” is a big hit with families. On the twelfth of January, 2005, the Western Australia Warriors hosted the Victorian Bushrangers in the first twenty/20 match on Australian soil. An unprecedented sell out crowd of 20,700 flocked to the WACA to see a fast, entertaining match. The first domestic match at Lords, the most prestigious cricket ground in England, between Middlesex and Surrey drew a similar 26,500 . It was the biggest domestic crowd in England since 1953 (not including one day finals). But this is all just small fish compared to the things that are going on in India.

The IPL (Indian Premier League) after just two seasons is already one of the biggest sporting leagues in the world. The money being thrown around in that competition is phenomenal. The teams themselves were worth an average of $90 million. Chenai payed $1.65 million for Indian wicketkeeper Mahendra Singh Dhoni for one season, which lasts for a total of just 56 days. Australian Andrew Symonds got payed $1.47 million for the same time period. This tournament is bringing a lot of money to India’s economy. Some say that if there wasn’t a salary cap on how much money each team can spend on players, cricketers would be getting payed more than soccer players.[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]"If we hadn't done that, I can tell you that our players would already be the highest-paid across any sport in the world," IPL chairman and commissioner Lalit Modi said. Sony payed $4.12 billion to broadcast the IPL in India alone over ten years, while One HD payed between ten and fifteen million dollars to broadcast into Australia over five years.

West Indian cricket is also thriving due to twenty/20 cricket. On the 11th of July, 2006, the Stanford 20/20 league between regional West Indian teams offered prize money of $1 million to the winning team. The celebrations afterward showed how much this meant to the players and their families.

The first ever Champions League tournament has just reached its conclusion. The ICL brings together the best teams around the world and plays them against each other. The winning team, The New South Wales Blues, received $3 million. This is a lot of money to the players, who some will never even don the green and gold. This is the most money that has ever been offered at Australian state level cricket by a margin.
Twenty/20 domestic cricket is also seeing a number of international retired players making a comeback. Players like Adam Gilchrist, Shane Warne and Glen McGrath have all made comebacks in the IPL, and without twenty/20 cricket this would not have been possible.

But with all of these domestic competitions being introduced, international cricket has not been reduced. This means that players wishing to play in the domestic leagues are faced with a very full schedule. This is increasing injury rate and some players are saying that their workload is too full. Players like Brett Lee are facing stress related injuries forcing them to sit on the sidelines. Twenty/20 cricket has really affected the domestic cricket scene bringing in more money and supporters.

There is a reason why twenty/20 cricket is bringing in so much money and support. It is a much more family orientated game when compared to test matches or even ‘one-dayers’. The game only runs for three hours compared to the eight hours of the other two codes. Twenty/20 encourages players to play big hits rather than play conservatively and many see this as more exciting. New rules are being introduced such as free hits and bowl offs (in case of a tie) which is making the game more of a spectacle. Twenty/20 is making cricket more exciting and bringing more people from all walks of life to the game.

Twenty/20 cricket is forcing players to use their imagination when playing shots. No longer are players relying on driving the ball (hitting the ball straight down the ground) or cutting and pulling the ball (hitting the ball square of the wicket) to get runs. While these shots are still used, more and more unorthodox shots are being introduced. Shots like the reverse sweep (flipping the bat around and paddling the ball behind the wicket) and the scoop (hitting the ball over the wicket keeper’s head) are now becoming regular cricket shots thanks to the introduction of twenty/20. This trend has had an effect on the up and coming cricketers in the juniors. Children are copying their heroes and playing these risky shots, a lot of the time unnecessarily.

Not only is twenty/20 changing the shots batsmen play, but it is also changing the equipment being used to play these shots. Cricketing brand Grey-Nicolls have developed a bat which enables players to hit the ball on both sides of the bat, rather than one side as with traditional cricket bats. The bat was first used by ex Australian Stuart Law in England’s county cricket. New South Wales player Dave Warner has also called the bat his own. Using the bat, he produced a man of the match performance scoring 65 including four sixes and seven fours. The bat, weighing between 2.8 and 2.10 pounds has a bigger handle then blade. It has taken into account the amount of Yorkers bowled in twenty/20s and made the toe of the bat thicker and more effective. The bats main advantage is the ability to hit the ball consistently off the back of the bat, so the batter can hit the ball cleaner and quicker behind the wicket. Twenty20 is changing the types of equipment used in cricket to suit the new shots being introduced.

Since the introduction of twenty/20 cricket, test and one day cricket, in most cases, have been made to take a backseat. Twenty/20 is quickly becoming the highlight of the summer with tickets selling much faster than the other forms. Not only is twenty/20 changing the way cricket is played in these forms, from the types of shots batsmen play and even the equipment that they use, but it is also changing the mindset of players. In years gone by, if a team was faced with a scenario where they had to score a lot of runs quickly, they would have found it impossible or gone for the draw if possible. But with scores of more than 200 being a chased down off 120 balls in twenty/20, we are seeing more and more teams take a offensive approach in tests or one dayers.

However, one day cricket faces a difficult and uncertain future. When it was introduced in the 1970’s, its main drawing point was that games get wrapped up in a day and you always get a result. People were attracted to it for its fast style game play. But these attributes and more are found in twenty/20. Test matches will never become extinct as they appeal to traditionalists and they are the original form of cricket but one day matches don’t seem have a spot. This is evident in 2008 when a crowd of just 38,858 showed up at the MCG for a final with old rivals England. Compare this to the 84,041 that turned up at the same venue just one year later to a twenty/20 between Australia and India or the one day international between India and Australia in early 2004 which drew 63,271, before twenty/20 internationals were around in Australia.

There has also been a push to bring Twenty/20 cricket into the Commonwealth Games. Twenty/20 is more suited to such an event over one day cricket and test cricket because these forms take too long to complete, which was evident in Malaysia 1998, the first and only time cricket has made an appearance at the event. Cricket is a sport that is mostly played within Commonwealth nations. Several high profile people are pushing for an inclusion into the Commonwealth Games. "The Commonwealth Games Federation is eager to have cricket back on the games schedule," said the federation’s president, Michael Fennell. Twenty/20 is bringing the potential to showcase the sport of cricket to the world.
Twenty/20 cricket is drastically changing the way people see cricket. For years, people have seen it as the slow, boring sport that can last five days and possibly not even achieve a result. But with the introduction of twenty/20, a lot of people are changing their views on cricket. As a result, crowds have been up and players are making much more money. New domestic leagues are being formed and old leagues are being given new lives. Twenty/20 has given cricket a chance to be seen on a worldwide scale at the Commonwealth Games. It is changing the way players play shots and the equipment they use to play them. It is not all good though, as it is now causing the demise of a once great power in one day cricket.
 
Or in other words, it's a bite sized bastardisation of the sport designed for the money hungry who serve it to the casual observers with short attention spans who want to see the ball smashed and have no appreciation for the true game.

Yeah, I agree with you, it has its place definitely :thumbsu: Money talks, test cricket is dying. The shame.
 
I agree with Shane Warne, all forms of ODI cricket should be replaced with Twenty20 cricket.

I live in Perth but I have already booked my tickets to watch the T20 over in Melbourne in Feburary. Already been to one over here which too was a sell out Aus V NZ T20 @ WACA.

The simple fact is the ICC must recognise this and replace what the spectators and fans want. Why they still have a 'limit' on the amount of International T20's in a summer is beyond me. Whats the point of playing only 3 T20 games a summer? (Aus V Pak 5 Feb, Aus V WI 21 Feb, Aus V WI 23 Feb) And we are scheduled for 10 ODI's which to me are just a bore to watch. It also brings the gap between the lesser and better sides, in T20, as more luck is involved.

T20 Champions League, Indian Premier League>>> ODI cricket & Test match cricket.

I feel the pressure will eventually get to ICC and Cricket Australia when they will schedule more T20's and less 'ODI's' . Its just a matter of time :thumbsu:
 
I agree with Shane Warne, all forms of ODI cricket should be replaced with Twenty20 cricket.

I live in Perth but I have already booked my tickets to watch the T20 over in Melbourne in Feburary. Already been to one over here which too was a sell out Aus V NZ T20 @ WACA.

The simple fact is the ICC must recognise this and replace what the spectators and fans want. Why they still have a 'limit' on the amount of International T20's in a summer is beyond me. Whats the point of playing only 3 T20 games a summer? (Aus V Pak 5 Feb, Aus V WI 21 Feb, Aus V WI 23 Feb) And we are scheduled for 10 ODI's which to me are just a bore to watch. It also brings the gap between the lesser and better sides, in T20, as more luck is involved.

T20 Champions League, Indian Premier League>>> ODI cricket & Test match cricket.

I feel the pressure will eventually get to ICC and Cricket Australia when they will schedule more T20's and less 'ODI's' . Its just a matter of time :thumbsu:

How is that a good thing?

I guess that's why rugby players etc get a look in to playing this at the 'elite level' as well.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

if you think 20/20 is our futurue for cricket. cricket is in a heap of trouble. i think if you poll a majority of real cricket fans. not the ones that just want too jump on the 20/20 band wagon. they will say they are only in test cricket and prefer odi cricket.
I agree with you. I'd take test cricket over twenty/20, but a vast majority wouldn't.
 
I honestly dont want to see Australia whitewash the West Indies and Pakistan in Test series and ODI series but more than likely its going to happen. I just think from Cricket Australia's point of view and the ICC they may have missed a trick here, not changing this current law of 2 T20's a summer against an opposition.. I am not sure what the crowd attendances for this summer will be,judging what has happened in India V Sri Lanka 1st test match I am not too optmistic of big crowds especially in the first 3 days.
 
West Indian cricket is also thriving due to twenty/20 cricket. On the 11th of July, 2006, the Stanford 20/20 league between regional West Indian teams offered prize money of $1 million to the winning team. The celebrations afterward showed how much this meant to the players and their families.

If it were REALLY thriving, then Allen Stanford would not be in jail for fraud, and the West Indies would not have had their best players boycott series and disrupt preparations for their tour here.

The first ever Champions League tournament has just reached its conclusion. The ICL brings together the best teams around the world and plays them against each other. The winning team, The New South Wales Blues, received $3 million. This is a lot of money to the players, who some will never even don the green and gold. This is the most money that has ever been offered at Australian state level cricket by a margin.

Ummmmm, the ICL is the Rebel product for one, and most of the NSW players will play for Australia as we all know. Plus there were a number of boring contests and low crowd interest, even some of the games with IPL teams struggled to get a crowd.


Twenty/20 domestic cricket is also seeing a number of international retired players making a comeback. Players like Adam Gilchrist, Shane Warne and Glen McGrath have all made comebacks in the IPL, and without twenty/20 cricket this would not have been possible.


If this form of the game is relying on blokes nearing 40 years old to garner interest, then the whole sport is in even more trouble than I thought.



There is a reason why twenty/20 cricket is bringing in so much money and support. It is a much more family orientated game when compared to test matches or even ‘one-dayers’. The game only runs for three hours compared to the eight hours of the other two codes. Twenty/20 encourages players to play big hits rather than play conservatively and many see this as more exciting. New rules are being introduced such as free hits and bowl offs (in case of a tie) which is making the game more of a spectacle. Twenty/20 is making cricket more exciting and bringing more people from all walks of life to the game.

It's not really a contest though unless the side batting first makes a certain total (usually between 135-170) and the side batting 2nd doesn't lose early wickets.
 
I agree with you. I'd take test cricket over twenty/20, but a vast majority wouldn't.

That vast majority of Cricket Fans would; Twenty20 might draw teenage girls to a few more games as a social outing, but they aren't going to be long term supporters of cricket.
 
Ive followed cricket for over 18 years (since 92) and I can tell you id pay to watch a T20 cricket match over a boxing day test/ashes test / south africa test series anyday.

Sorry but I just dont have the attention span to last 5 days of a cricket match. Too many negative tactics in test cricket: bad light rule, bowlers bowling negatively, batsman batting at around 2.50 runs per over it just doesnt appeal to me.

T20 is much more interesting, you get a result in the space of 3-4 hours and you go home happy , in that you have watched a decent contest.
 
Ive followed cricket for over 18 years (since 92) and I can tell you id pay to watch a T20 cricket match over a boxing day test/ashes test / south africa test series anyday.

Sorry but I just dont have the attention span to last 5 days of a cricket match. Too many negative tactics in test cricket: bad light rule, bowlers bowling negatively, batsman batting at around 2.50 runs per over it just doesnt appeal to me.

T20 is much more interesting, you get a result in the space of 3-4 hours and you go home happy , in that you have watched a decent contest.

You clearly don't understand test cricket if you don't think it's a decent contest.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

You clearly don't understand test cricket if you don't think it's a decent contest.

I'd rather watch a 5 day Test with no result than a T20 game decided on one guy getting lucky with a couple of slogs.

It's the back and forth of Test Cricket that makes it glorious.
 
Twenty/20 cricket has brought a lot to the cricketing world in both money and crowds. Crowds have been up both nationally and internationally across the world. The highlight crowd wise of the cricket season is always the twenty/20 games. On the first of February, 2008, a sell out crowd of 84,041 attended the match between Australia and India at the Melbourne Cricket Ground. Another match on the ninth of January, 2006, was viewed by 38,894 people at the Gabba. This is the fourth biggest Gabba attendance ever.

<SNIP>.
What 20/20 is doing to cricket is dumbing it down. No more, no less.
 
Test cricket still will be the number one version of the game. It actually shows the talent of all cricketers, not just the sloggers. It is an actual contest and I find it more interesting to follow, even if it might be 'slow'.

I agree with the criticism about 20/20 but it is a better alternative than 50 over cricket right now. The first 10 overs you might get some excitement, then the rest of the innings is just hitting balls into gaps. It gets boring quickly, particularly if the chasing team loses early wickets.
 
I love T20s, but if you call yourself a cricket lover and would rather watch these 3 hour slogfests over any of Australia's last 11 Tests (any Tests really but the last 11 have been pretty good), then you are a tool :thumbsu:
 
If they leave a window open for IPL every year, then I think having a T20 World Cup afterwards is a great idea. Test Cricket is still the only real cricket :thumbsu:
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Or in other words, it's a bite sized bastardisation of the sport designed for the money hungry who serve it to the casual observers with short attention spans who want to see the ball smashed and have no appreciation for the true game.

Yeah, I agree with you, it has its place definitely :thumbsu: Money talks, test cricket is dying. The shame.

That pretty much sums it up for me.

There is no money in test cricket any more, and it's only a matter of time before big gun players in the primes of their careers start putting T20 ahead of tests and even ODI's.

That will be the final nail in the coffin, and tests will go the way of SOO footy, only to be cranked out every so often as a curiosity.
 
ODI used to be the breakaway league too. Nobody cares about the survival of test and odi cricket except the old toff nose flogs who sit around twisting the ends of their moustaches with their fingers and smoking their pipes. Things change, and unfortunately, nobody has time to waste a whole day watching a game of cricket anymore. I know a few cricket tragics and even they don't have the patience to sit and watch every ball of a ODI or attend every day of a test. The middle overs in ODIs are a joke.

Get behind T20 - Listen to the fans.
 
ODI used to be the breakaway league too. Nobody cares about the survival of test and odi cricket except the old toff nose flogs who sit around twisting the ends of their moustaches with their fingers and smoking their pipes. Things change, and unfortunately, nobody has time to waste a whole day watching a game of cricket anymore. I know a few cricket tragics and even they don't have the patience to sit and watch every ball of a ODI or attend every day of a test. The middle overs in ODIs are a joke.

Get behind T20 - Listen to the fans.


what the minority.
 
ODI used to be the breakaway league too. Nobody cares about the survival of test and odi cricket except the old toff nose flogs who sit around twisting the ends of their moustaches with their fingers and smoking their pipes. Things change, and unfortunately, nobody has time to waste a whole day watching a game of cricket anymore. I know a few cricket tragics and even they don't have the patience to sit and watch every ball of a ODI or attend every day of a test. The middle overs in ODIs are a joke.

Get behind T20 - Listen to the fans.

I'm far from a cricket tragic sitting there 'twisting my moustache'. I simply prefer a game that requires a bit of skill and thought, ebb and flow.

I get that 20/20 is entertaining. Yes - it's entertaining. I'll watch it if it's on. But nobody can sit there and tell me that it's a more interesting form of the game than test cricket. In tests, there are so many possibilities within the match. Heroic innings, bowling spells that come out of nowhere. The question of declaring at the right time to get a result. Sessions that can change the entire course of the match. There's so much to it, more than 'oh, f*ck, you mean I have to take notice of something for more than 2 hours? Too hard'.

20/20 is nothing more than 'come out and hit it as hard as possible'. That's great for a little while, and is interesting because from such a 'rushed' base, any team can win on the day. The problem I have with that is that I appreciate the skills of the great cricket players and teams, who deserve to have an edge over others because of their abilities, and don't just win because they were 'lucky' enough not to get out while swinging wildly.

Millions of people lap up KFC because they can drive up to the window and get it immediately. But they scoff it down and feel indifferent afterwards. You should always have the choice to go to a real restaurant, even if appreciating it is a bit harder.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom