Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Quite surprised to see Collingwood has the fourth least votes. Pendles is 34 and still their best player. A few guns but a fair few average players in the team there.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
In your dreams. North would be lucky to beat Frankston this year.Hawthorn then daylight.
In your dreams. North would be lucky to beat Frankston this year.
And we would never get Tom Phillips for a 4th round pick.
Too much time on BF with your shitposting and not enough time actually following football?
Did you miss the whole Collingwood salary cap saga? It went on for over a month. Well, it went on all year. It just became hard for Collingwood to deny once they started trading good players for junk picks.
Gee times are tough at the Hawks when you’re hanging your hat on Tom Phillips as an acquisition.
Yes, we should focus on more half back flankers.
Seriously, Phillips is nothing more than a solid, C-grade contributor. Decent little pickup, especially for the price, but nothing to write home about. Your list is still in horrible shape and will be for a few years. I don't like saying it, but Hawthorn will likely finish bottom 2 in 2021.Yes, we should focus on more half back flankers.
Based on letting experienced players move on and going to the draft? It isn't 2018 anymore.You’ll be lucky to beat them in the next decade while your deluded coach still thinks you’re contending.
I disagree we will finish bottom 2 but also not overly fussed if it happens, we are not a finals team at the moment.Seriously, Phillips is nothing more than a solid, C-grade contributor. Decent little pickup, especially for the price, but nothing to write home about. Your list is still in horrible shape and will be for a few years. I don't like saying it, but Hawthorn will likely finish bottom 2 in 2021.
North, essendon, Adelaide have some of the youngest/least experienced teams so will take some time to get a read on their selections. But Hawks are top 6 for experience, given your not contending it puts you in a different category to the other three.I disagree we will finish bottom 2 but also not overly fussed if it happens, we are not a finals team at the moment.
People are so adamant about who is in a worse position when it is pretty much irrelevant at this point.
Fact is all of Adelaide, North, Essendon, Hawthorn currently are not great and it will come down to which team Drafts/trades better over the next 2/3 years.
Could argue any of those 4 teams or some of the middling teams that won't contend are in a worse position.
Sure but this doesn’t take any weight in to how good any of those kids are. Essendon lost some experience and added 3 young but completely unproven players.North, essendon, Adelaide have some of the youngest/least experienced teams so will take some time to get a read on their selections. But Hawks are top 6 for experience, given your not contending it puts you in a different category to the other three.
Hawthorn comfortably in my opinion. I think it’s a really poor list.
being younger does not make them any better
Why are you triggered? The talent on the Hawks list under 25 is pretty bad. The Dogs had a lot of very good talent under 25 in 2015 and needed a coach to put it together. Hawthorn's list is very uninspiring.Almost as bad as the Dogs in 2015.
The Bombers list is .6 years younger and that does not look at best 22’s because we can’t know that yet.Gives them a hell of a lot more chance of being better in the future though.
Being young and bad isn't great, being old and bad is worse.
The Bombers list is .6 years younger and that does not look at best 22’s because we can’t know that yet.
no that does not indicate they are a hell of a lot more likely to improve.
Sure but this doesn’t take any weight in to how good any of those kids are. Essendon lost some experience and added 3 young but completely unproven players.
being younger does not make them any better
You are .6 years younger... this is just a stupid post.Yeah, ours (and Adelaide, and Nth's picks) might be busts... but you're fielding a team with an age demographic that should be contending or rebuilding.
I've felt that our team was always close to pulling a rabbit out of a hat with some deft top-ups, but it didn't happen. We've taken our medicine, with more to come, and I'm hoping that in 15 years or so that the Hawks do too.