Wasn't a belting, but it was a very convincing win.
Wimbledon
- Thread starter Russian
- Start date
- Tagged users None
JohnF said:
Couldn't be more correct!
Go Federer for Final, he is a champion!
Hewitt No. 2 player in the world.
- Thread starter
- #203
Roddick won in 4
Aussie Stephen Huss and South African Wesley Moodie have won the men's doubles championships, coming through qualifying and beating the 6th, 9th, 3rd, 1st and 2nd seeds from the second round to the final. Huss had won $225,600 before this tournament, today he picked up $514,000
In the women's doubles Stosur and Stewart lost in the semis.
Aussie Stephen Huss and South African Wesley Moodie have won the men's doubles championships, coming through qualifying and beating the 6th, 9th, 3rd, 1st and 2nd seeds from the second round to the final. Huss had won $225,600 before this tournament, today he picked up $514,000
In the women's doubles Stosur and Stewart lost in the semis.
Borry
Protected Species
- Aug 15, 2004
- 8,738
- 2,171
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- South Sydney
Solid performance by Federer and at his best hes unstoppable. The only differenc was that Federer broke Hewitt's serve about 4 times for the whole match and hewitt broke only once and that was a key to the outcome. Federer should win the final comfortably. Roddick will take it up to him with a go or broke power game but Federer will just be too solid and probably win in straight sets.
- Thread starter
- #206
Venus fell over to concede the second set break at 5-5
Followed it up with 10 brilliant points to break back to love and take a 3-0 and then 5-1 lead in the tiebreak, Davenport gave her a scare winning the next 3 points, before Venus took the two points on Davenport's serve for a 7-4 result levelled the match at a set all
Followed it up with 10 brilliant points to break back to love and take a 3-0 and then 5-1 lead in the tiebreak, Davenport gave her a scare winning the next 3 points, before Venus took the two points on Davenport's serve for a 7-4 result levelled the match at a set all
Extremely close but a big congratulations to Williams for winning it for the 3rd time. I think the game really came to a close when they played that 25 shot rally in about the 10th game of the 3rd set. After that you can see Davenport was visibly tired and her game started to fall apart and Williams slowly took over.Drummond said:
Now onto tomorrow night, Federer vs Roddick, go FEDERER !!!!!!!!
Federer will win, in easy 3 sets.Maybe one tiebreak set.But its a no brainer I got some good odds at $.70 and i put 500 on federer
I got some good odds at $.70 and i put 500 on federer
Centrebet has him at $1.14 now, not really worth it. I still had Williams at $1.60 before the start of the final, that is good enoughThats Power said:Federer will win, in easy 3 sets.Maybe one tiebreak set.But its a no brainer
I reckon Hewitt now has a genuine plan to beat Federer. Go all out attack, hit it deep, and make him run. If he changed his game to play like this permanently, then he will eventually reach Federer's standard. Hewitt can take a lot out of that encounter.
Am I only one who doesn't like Federer?
When he loses, albeit which is not very often, he is a complete sook and fails to pay any credit to his opponent.
When he loses, albeit which is not very often, he is a complete sook and fails to pay any credit to his opponent.
Tezmyster said:Yes
That reminds me of the Collingwood game vs Sydney, no credit given to Sydney, it was all the cheating time keepers fault
You mean like how the AFL cost you the 2004 premiership?
Tezmyster said:
Oh, you don't know.
Never mind, ask your coach - he'll tell you.
If you're talking about the fairness in forcing teams to play finals at the MCG even though they earnt the home game I fully agree with whatever Lethal said, and this is not just for Brisbane but also for the other 5 non-Victorian teams. The AFL can't on one hand say it's a national competition and then on the other say Victoria is the home of AFL so finals should be played there.NICK THE PIE MAN said:
Anyways, this is off topic, back to Wimbledon....
Milk money , put another 500 on centrebet this morning ...MAN!!this is so good
, put another 500 on centrebet this morning ...MAN!!this is so good 
Funkalicous said:
Hewitt will never in a million years come close to Federer's standard.
The Swiss champ is so much more talented than the SA Bogan it's not funny. (Well it is if you happen to dislike Hewitt)
Ridiculous call. If he had a plan, he forgot all about it. Rod Laver himself said that he'd be privileged to be mentioned in the same class as Federer, yet you think that Hewitt could "eventually reach Federer's standard". Stupid stupid call. The way Hewitt's going, he'd be lucky to even win another set off Federer.Funkalicous said:
Bull******** that Roddick is number two and Henman number six. Henman is the most overrated tennis player i have ever seen always hyp bout him winning the major but always gets bundled out early. Hewitt,Nadal and Safin should be ahead of Roddick. Never really understood the Seeds and Rankings on how it works.
Henmann is British so of course they're going to rally him up for his home Grand Slam. We do the same thing over here for Hewitt and the Poo, and all the other big name players. It's all about local public interestChops18 said:
