Science/Environment Anti-vacc Crazies at it again. Post appropriate outrage ITT

[Clubs are trumps]

It might be news to you that there is a world wide shortage of IC Nurses. Guess why?

Mate i work at the hospital i mentioned in my post above. Im giving an insight into whats happening. I watched my ex struggle to get employment as a nurse after graduating here during the outbreak of the pandemic, simply because she was born in Nepal. If you're going to ask a condescending sarcastic question you can cram it.

 

[mottrain]

Yeah true.

I dont need science to tell me the planet is sick from what humans do to it though.

Try hugging a tree. Feel the woo.

You do because otherwise there is no explanation for it.

 

[little graham]

Yeah true.

I dont need science to tell me the planet is sick from what humans do to it though.

Try hugging a tree. Feel the woo.

If you add a heating agent(carbon) into our atmosphere your gonna get snow every time, like if you add mercury into a kids bloodstream your gonna improve there immune system everytime.

 

[vealesy]

You do because otherwise there is no explanation for it.

You dont need an explanation to know something.

 

[Long Live HFC]

i like to be factual, and to the point

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

can we stop calling them Anti-vacc and call them what they are: the pro polio lobby?

 

[little graham]

Freedom of Information Act in the UK filed by a doctor there has revealed 30 years of secret official documents showing that government experts have
1. Known the vaccines don’t work
2. Known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent
3. Known they are a hazard to children
4. Colluded to lie to the public
5. Worked to prevent safety studies

http://nsnbc.me/2013/05/10/the-vacc...documents-from-uk-reveal-30-years-of-coverup/

I trust that all those subjugating people with concerns of the business practices of companies involved in vaccines have read this.

 

[Long Live HFC]

im convinced!

nsnbc.me, or nsnbc ìnternational, is a lowercase alternative news site created in 2013 by a Danish man named Christoff Lehmann as a replacement for his blog.[1] The website is one of the more professional-looking crank sites. However, under the shiny exterior, the website supports a wide range of conspiracy theories and woo.

nsnbc features articles supporting 9/11 conspiracy theories,[2][3] FEMA concentration camps,[2][4] Bilderberg conspiracies,[2][5] Zionist conspiracies,[6] Rothschild conspiracies,[6] Monsanto conspiracies,[7] Séralini's discredited rat study,[8] vaccine-induced autism,[9] fluoride conspiracies,[10] and cancer woo.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Nsnbc.me

 

[vealesy]

So its not a vested interest.

Already holds more credibility than anything the WHO sanctions.

 

[Long Live HFC]

yeah totally!

 

[vealesy]

yeah totally!

So what DO you make of the coverup?

 

[Long Live HFC]

i dont bother researching topics from obvious nutters when their sources are clearly bollocks. you can thank the 911 truthers for that. obviously, if there's a more objective and reasonable source available, i could be tempted.

 

[vealesy]

i dont bother researching topics from obvious nutters when their sources are clearly bollocks. you can thank the 911 truthers for that. obviously, if there's a more objective and reasonable source available, i could be tempted.

The source is there.

Cant see what your brainwashing wont allow?

 

[Long Live HFC]

that link is full of nonsense.

 

[vealesy]

The video?

 

[Long Live HFC]

that'd be like chewing a bit of dog s**t in order to find the corn. if you wanna discuss something without being dismissed out of hand, you need to provide proper resources. if that was the best link LG could find, then count me out.

 

[vealesy]

Rrright.

So basically this is you.

 

[Long Live HFC]

6. Inability to tell good evidence from bad. Conspiracy theorists have no place for peer-review, for scientific knowledge, for the respectability of sources. The fact that a claim has been made by anybody, anywhere, is enough for them to reproduce it and demand that the questions it raises be answered, as if intellectual enquiry were a matter of responding to every rumour. While they do this, of course, they will claim to have "open minds" and abuse the sceptics for apparently lacking same.

 

[vealesy]

More ignorance?

Pretty dismissive and unscientific.

 

[Partridge]

6. Inability to tell good evidence from bad. Conspiracy theorists have no place for peer-review, for scientific knowledge, for the respectability of sources. The fact that a claim has been made by anybody, anywhere, is enough for them to reproduce it and demand that the questions it raises be answered, as if intellectual enquiry were a matter of responding to every rumour. While they do this, of course, they will claim to have "open minds" and abuse the sceptics for apparently lacking same.

They do have open minds - fairly easy when there is no brain in your head.

 

[vealesy]

Like clockwork, the shills spout their handbook's infallible words.

Worse than fundie christians. Worse.

 

[little graham]

After decades of passionate debate, parents probably missed the repeated admissions by drug companies and governments alike that vaccines do in fact cause autism. For concerned parents seeking the truth, it’s worth remembering that the exact same people who own the world’s drug companies also own America’s news outlets

http://www.whiteoutpress.com/timeless/courts-quietly-confirm-mmr-vaccine-causes-autism/

So how many in here think they know better than a court?

 

[Pie eyed]

So its not a vested interest.

Already holds more credibility than anything the WHO sanctions.

Now you're blaming The Who?

Keith Moon grave roll imminent.

 

[samFFC]

Sorry who fudged what data?

This data? http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/images/measles_incidence.gif

I know I'm tired of being told measles and mumps are super uncommon and basically all jabbed kids don't get sick from them, when I see heaps of cases in hospitals every day.

There are literally like dozens each year. #vaccinefail

 

[samFFC]

http://www.whiteoutpress.com/timeless/courts-quietly-confirm-mmr-vaccine-causes-autism/

So how many in here think they know better than a court?

1. Encephalitis is not autism.
2. Encephalitis is a known risk associated with MMR, occurs around 1 in a million. As opposed to measles which causes encephalitis much more commonly.
3. The court does not rule on the scientific basis of claims, but rather if there is a potential for compensation within a vaccine giving window, they generally pay out.


http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/mmr-and-autism-rises-from-the-dead/

http://www.forbes.com/sites/emilywi...urt-rulings-dont-confirm-autism-vaccine-link/

 

[Long Live HFC]

http://www.whiteoutpress.com/timeless/courts-quietly-confirm-mmr-vaccine-causes-autism/

So how many in here think they know better than a court?

if you knew anything about the case in question, you'd know that the court's didn't say the vaccine caused the autism. you're an intellectually dishonest peasant.