- Apr 4, 2013
- 13,670
- 16,890
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
I don't think anyone would envy someone that admires Charlie Sheen.Chieftain,
Envy is not the same as hate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think anyone would envy someone that admires Charlie Sheen.Chieftain,
Envy is not the same as hate.
No problem with comprehension, I just was wondering if you had actively considered what you typed before you hit 'post reply', and give you the opportunity to retract your comment if it was in error. As it appears you do hold this view, can I ask if a straight man, calling a gay man a pansy/******/NTTAWWTter, would or would not, in your view, be an attempt at shaming?Why ask a question if I just answered it? Do you have a problem with comprehension?
It is a lot more than my opinion, in my experience I have found it is not in common use. I had not heard it used in the context MRA extremists use until I came across your contributions on this site.'Mangina' not being common use is nothing more than your opinion. Claims and opinions do not equate to 'backing up'.
You are so confused.I know women hate each other, but they unite to fight a common foe when it involves issues with men.
It is a lot more than my opinion, in my experience I have found it is not in common use. I had not heard it used in the context MRA extremists use until I came across your contributions on this site.
But if a man ends up not being a very good at Zombicide (or whatever else his mates might value) ultimately it doesnt really bother him. However if he is incapable of attracting women, or if when he does, he fails at providing for her financially he takes that very seriously. Hence high rates of male suicide.None of my gaming mates are showing off their new copy of Zombicide in order to attract women, you can be sure of that.
So what is the basis for your claim that it *is* in common use?Your experience adds the same amount of weight toward backing your view up as claims and opinions - nothing - for your experience is subjective. Your not having heard of the term is neither here nor there.
You are so confused.
If you really want to assert your male dominance, just curl into a ball and the women will think they have done you in. Then they will turn on each other and afterwards you can spring up and become supreme ruler of the wreckage.
In another one of these threads, perhaps this one, it was claimed that high rates of depression in women (and their higher rate of suicide attempts) were as a direct result of the breakdown of traditional gender roles.But if a man ends up not being a very good at Zombicide (or whatever else his mates might value) ultimately it doesnt really bother him. However if he is incapable of attracting women, or if when he does, he fails at providing for her financially he takes that very seriously. Hence high rates of male suicide.
So what is the basis for your claim that it *is* in common use?
On what basis do you maintain that it is in 'common use'?The fact that the term is in common use and the term is found in a common use dictionary.
You mean the Urbandictionary, which anyone can contribute to?The fact that the term is in common use and the term is found in a common use dictionary.
You mean the Urbandictionary, which anyone can contribute to?
On what basis do you maintain that it is in 'common use'?
In another one of these threads, perhaps this one, it was claimed that high rates of depression in women (and their higher rate of suicide attempts) were as a direct result of the breakdown of traditional gender roles.
I call bullshit on the claim for both sexes.
I don't really take the field of psychology as one that should be listened to. Every extra DSM defines more of what it is to be human as an illness.Women's happiness has decreased relative to men's from 1972 onwards.
http://journalistsresource.org/studies/society/gender-society/paradox-declining-female-happiness
You were banging broads in 1972?Any single man "banging broads" (thanks Chieftain) in the current dating scene will attest to this.
one claim doesnt refute the other.In another one of these threads, perhaps this one, it was claimed that high rates of depression in women (and their higher rate of suicide attempts) were as a direct result of the breakdown of traditional gender roles.
I call bullshit on the claim for both sexes.
I find it endlessly amusing that a bloke who lives his life as strictly defined by thousand year old scriptures chooses to use a non-authoritative source as a dictionary so as to suit his argument.Indeed. It's a dictionary, in part, for common use terms.
yeah, but they called them DamesYou were banging broads in 1972?
So how can you attest?I wish.