Gillard was just as bad as Abbott and you don't have to open your eyes to see that.
Gillard was a much better negotiator than Abbott is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gillard was just as bad as Abbott and you don't have to open your eyes to see that.
It isn't hard for Labor to negotiate with The Greens. They only have too make their policies more extreme.Gillard was a much better negotiator than Abbott is.
It isn't hard for Labor to negotiate with The Greens. They only have too make their policies more extreme.
Lol.It isn't hard for Labor to negotiate with The Greens. They only have too make their policies more extreme.
You mean eyes wide shut?Gillard was just as bad as Abbott and you don't have to open your eyes to see that.
Come on Runvs. Palmer is playing the socialist card big time. He also has a big grudge against the Libs for something Newman allegedly did/didn't do in regards to building a rail line to his coal mine up North.Gillard had to negotiate with Windsor and Oakeshott. Both of whom had strong right wing leanings.
The independents in the Senate right now are mostly right leaning so Abbott should not be having the trouble he is having getting the votes.
Come on Runvs. Palmer is playing the socialist card big time. He also has a big grudge against the Libs for something Newman allegedly did/didn't do in regards to building a rail line to his coal mine up North.
Take a look at the legislation he has rejected. Why would he reject competition in Unis which the heads of these Unis support? Why would he object to cutting welfare in the budget? He is pretending to be a socialist when he is not, I agree.If you think Clive Palmer and his party is 'playing the socialist card' or is in any way on the left in politics, you have a seriously flawed understanding of our political parties.
Take a look at the legislation he has rejected. Why would he reject competition in Unis which the heads of these Unis support? Why would he object to cutting welfare in the budget? He is pretending to be a socialist when he is not, I agree.
Take a look at the legislation he has rejected. Why would he reject competition in Unis which the heads of these Unis support? Why would he object to cutting welfare in the budget? He is pretending to be a socialist when he is not, I agree.
You have a serious misunderstanding of the history of rural politics.
Bob Katter is a trenchant advocate of bush socialism. It might surprise you to know that among his mixed bag of heroes includes Red "Ted' Theodore who advocated pump-priming of spending during the Depression and Ben Chifley who advocated state led infrastructure projects like the Snowy Mountain Scheme which saw economic growth in the hinterland. He's an infrastructure and growth man against the sclerotic free market policies of the Liberal Party. On social issues he's much more attuned to conservatism but he's very much pragmatic and open to suggestions and political suasion.
The same thing can be said of many political animals in the bush. Without a form of bush socialism everything becomes more expensive in the bush. The internet, medical care, education, transport. They know which way social policy blows in the electorate and don't bother particularly hard with canvassing that type of question in their electorates - that's for the suburbs. Instead they look to rural economic projects, subsidies and protection.
Gillard could actually get some stuff through the Senate despite leading a minority government and having to deal with a maniac undermining her from within. Abbott has none of these handicaps and yet has been terrible. He still got two years though (probably )Gillard was just as bad as Abbott and you don't have to open your eyes to see that.
...because he ain't going to make it that far.I'd say 'One Term Tony' is looking increasingly unlikely.
The fallout from the Queensland election will spook the coalition further.
I reckon the only thing currently keeping Tones in a job is what got him the job in the first place - a complete lack of genuine contenders.
The next few weeks should be interesting as the wannabe PM's position themselves and further marginalise the most incompetent PM in the nation's history.
Most on social media are outside his demographic.Someone needs to have a word in his shell like that social media users are also voters and that he dismisses their views as "electronic graffiti" at his own peril.