- Mar 6, 2014
- 41,562
- 39,805
- AFL Club
- Geelong
I saw more effort in the last 2 quarters today than in the previous1018 combined.
EFA
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I saw more effort in the last 2 quarters today than in the previous1018 combined.
I can see that could work but having one less tall play today really seemed like it increased our speed all over the ground, it was especially noticeable with our ability to get to, make, and create more contests especially in the second half. It could be a bit of a horses for courses thing.That's why Tummy needs to be the full forward - working out of the square and up to the 50. Walker and Clarke need to work up to the wings.
Seems to have a great reach, too, YOTC- evidenced by being able to reach over from behind a larger opponent and still effect the spoil.Bews did ok today again, particularly in the second half. He's no star but he is going to be a useful role player for us. Got caught on the wrong side of the contest a couple of times but he was good at getting in front of his man on a number of times to win a contest.
Walker is the same height as Tummy. Don't forget we had 1 on the bench too..I can see that could work but having one less tall play today really seemed like it increased our speed all over the ground, it was especially noticeable with our ability to get to, make, and create more contests especially in the second half. It could be a bit of a horses for courses thing.
+ 1 packs explode, balls bounce out and around and opportunities are created.Clark is a very dangerous player…as another poster mentioned, things happen around him.
Well you'd think Gore will get a go next week, and Smedts will too because he's Scott's favourite though Thurlow really takes his place in the side so I'd rather see Blease get a crack, then we'd have real speed in the team and could possibly afford to play both Tommy and Walker.Walker is the same height as Tummy. Don't forget we had 1 on the bench too..
I think Dawson out of the side quickens us up immensely.
But more than those things and the reason we looked so much quicker is that Stokes nor Mackie were playing. They always hold play up when they get the ball on a wing.
Same as Walker. Plus those little valuable tap-ons, shepherds, etc etc. not sure if they get a goal-assist but they are just immense! He certainly seems to have a very agile brain- can't see why there are calls for him to play in the backline when he seems to be quite agile - as quick as some of the blokes who are 6" shorter than him.+ 1 packs explode, balls bounce out and around and opportunities are created.
I think the calls were (and I am guilty of this) a way of being able to fit him in the team. Make no mistake lots of clubs will be sniffing around him next year, Brisbane, Freo etc.Same as Walker. Plus those little valuable tap-ons, shepherds, etc etc. not sure if they get a goal-assist but they are just immense! He certainly seems to have a very agile brain- can't see why there are calls for him to play in the backline when he seems to be quite agile - as quick as some of the blokes who are 6" shorter than him.
Kinda, but Mitch plays much angrier than Tom too.kind of what Hawkins use to do before the back concerns?
Tells me one thing....Re Cockatoo
very late…he got possession ( a mark) and Selwood motioned to him to go back and settle….he ignored that and delivered to Blicavs for the sealer.
Tells you plenty I reckon…skill and self confidence abound…he's going to be one very good player.
I agree re: defence, but really in the modern game you need a forward line that can create really good forward line pressure on opposition teams coming out because if you do that then it gives the midfield time to position themselves defensively and then obviously the defence time to set themselves up properly.I think in one sense the forward and backlines are incidental when it comes to what's going on in the midfield. The forward line sucks because they don't get good quick supply and the backs leak because it's constantly getting pumped in there.
I reckon it had more to do with how we moved the ball into the forward line, rather than who we had down there. Hawkins would have kicked a bag today I reckon because in the 2nd half at least, we decided to be more direct with the footy and give our forwards a chance 1 on 1 rather than possessing the ball through the midfield allowing the opposition to fold back and block up the space.Yeah 3 talls are too many...It's a conundrum. Tommy is a gun but he doesn't really apply any forward line pressure due to his enormous size, it's strange because it almost felt like we were better today without him up there - which I can't believe I'm saying...
You're probably right about Hawkins but I'd be really worried with three tall forwards if the ball hits the ground that teams could really exploit us with speed on the rebound. Though it worked fairly well (apart from the GF) for Sydney last year with Buddy, Tippett, and Reid.I reckon it had more to do with how we moved the ball into the forward line, rather than who we had down there. Hawkins would have kicked a bag today I reckon because in the 2nd half at least, we decided to be more direct with the footy and give our forwards a chance 1 on 1 rather than possessing the ball through the midfield allowing the opposition to fold back and block up the space.
I think the 3 tall forwards could work provided we get the ball into them quickly to allow them 1 on 1 opportunities.
BANG!I think in one sense the forward and backlines are incidental when it comes to what's going on in the midfield. The forward line sucks because they don't get good quick supply and the backs leak because it's constantly getting pumped in there.
Let's also not forget Hawkins kicked 68 goals last season. Walker is a good replacement for Hawk and I hope we play him as much as possible given he's OOC this year and I don't want to see him walk out, that said this side did miss Hawkins and was a weaker side as a result.perhaps, but then again, Hawkins may not have led to the right places on the ground to even be in the position to kick the goals Walker did. Can't exactly say had Hawkins played, he'd have kicked a bag, because based on his 2015 stats (including praccie games), that likely would not have occurred.
Let's not forget, Walker was troubling both Hawthorn and North Melbourne before he was forced to play in the ruck in last years finals campaign. That was with limited midfield supply also. Who knows what may have transpired had he remained in his preferred position.
perhaps, but then again, Hawkins may not have led to the right places on the ground to even be in the position to kick the goals Walker did. Can't exactly say had Hawkins played, he'd have kicked a bag, because based on his 2015 stats (including praccie games), that likely would not have occurred.
Let's not forget, Walker was troubling both Hawthorn and North Melbourne before he was forced to play in the ruck in last years finals campaign. That was also with limited midfield supply. Who knows what may have transpired had he remained in his preferred position.
This may sound bad but would it be worth letting Hawk go and getting something really good for him like a couple of high draft picks? Or a young GWS/Gold Coast mid plus a high draft pick? My personal opinion is Hawk isn't going to get much better given his back history but there's massive upside for Walker...Blasphemy? Danger would be a free agent so I don't think we'd have to give up anything for him if he wanted to come 'home.'Let's also not forget Hawkins kicked 68 goals last season. Walker is a good replacement for Hawk and I hope we play him as much as possible given he's OOC this year and I don't want to see him walk out, that said this side did miss Hawkins and was a weaker side as a result.
How we'll fit Hawk/Clark/Stanley/Walker/Blitz remains to be seen though.
Sound like his wick is getting a little shorter by the week. Are we SURE he isn't reading BF?Scott talking about Lonergan
Scott preached caution against an early diagnosis being made on any player who suffers concussion.
"One thing I will say about Tom's situation is if you're a so-called external expert, I think you should be really careful around the issues around concussion for individual players when you've never set eyes on them," Scott said.
"If you want to help, come in and see him face to face, get a feel for the situation, speak to the experts that we have internally before you spout off for self-indulgent reasons."
Now who on earth could he have been talking about?
Yeah 3 talls are too many...It's a conundrum. Tommy is a gun but he doesn't really apply any forward line pressure due to his enormous size, it's strange because it almost felt like we were better today without him up there - which I can't believe I'm saying...