Anti-Australia ABC does it again - Dapto Dogs under threat!

[Gus Poyet]

nice too see you come clean and admit you blood your dogs, its clear now you're just trying to justify you're barbaric behaviour.
you're also a dirty ******* cheat.

I said as much a long time ago. Awesome effort at keeping up.

Actually Einstein, we gave them to young dogs who hadn't even raced to educate them.

Thus its not cheating when the dog hasn't even been ******* well named yet. Genius.

 

[Sydney Bloods]

what a load of s**t. you blood them you're a cheat. i hope you end up getting nabbed ya campaigner.

 

[Thrawn]

There is a reason, it's been explained many a time.

An excuse more likely, because it's been pointed out that it's not necessary (and also cheating).

So if people don't laugh and take the use of a live bait seriously its acceptable then?

Nope. It's unacceptable because it's barbaric, unnecessary, a form of cheating and against the law. Pretty solid reasons for opposing it I would've thought!

 

[Gus Poyet]

what a load of s**t. you blood them you're a cheat. i hope you end up getting nabbed ya campaigner.

I don't race them anymore...

Said that too if you'd learn to read.

 

[Sydney Bloods]

I don't race them anymore...

Said that too if you'd learn to read.

we shouldn't even be allowed to bred them.

 

[Gus Poyet]

An excuse more likely, because it's been pointed out that it's not necessary (and also cheating).

Pointed out its not neccesary by who?

Nope. It's unacceptable because it's barbaric, unnecessary, a form of cheating and against the law. Pretty solid reasons for opposing it I would've thought!

Yes but you're in full accpetance of barbaric practices. You've even tried to justify some of them.

 

[Gus Poyet]

we shouldn't even be allowed to bred them.

Who is "we"?

And why shouldn't people be able to breed them?

 

[Sydney Bloods]

Who is "we"?

And why shouldn't people be able to breed them?

I meant to write you, as in people like you sadistic cheating campaigners.

 

[Gus Poyet]

I meant to write you, as in people like you sadistic cheating campaigners.

Why do you even bother commenting?

You don't even grasp the concept of young unnamed greyhounds not even being racing greyhounds.

Quite simply, you have * all idea about what you're talking about.

 

[Thrawn]

Pointed out its not neccesary by who?

Yes but you're in full accpetance of barbaric practices. You've even tried to justify some of them.

By the greyhound industry, ironically enough. And the law as well - live baiting isn't legal. By default that makes it not necessary.

Such as? Please tell me where I supported such practices. I only gave reasons why they may be viewed as acceptable, that doesn't necessarily make it my opinion. Neither does it when I'm pointing out the obvious difference of intent/mindset which is paramount here.

Oh, and thanks for admitting why said practice is unacceptable.

 

[Gus Poyet]

By the greyhound industry, ironically enough. And the law as well - live baiting isn't legal. By default that makes it not necessary.

It is neccessary for some dogs. Thus it will continue to happen regardless of all of this hoo-ha. They will just become more guarded about where and when they do it.

Such as? Please tell me where I supported such practices. I only gave reasons why they may be viewed as acceptable, that doesn't necessarily make it my opinion. Neither does it when I'm pointing out the obvious difference of intent/mindset which is paramount here.

That's your personal opinion. It in no way makes it a fact or any more valid than anyone elses opinion on the matter. You say the intent is to be cruel, I say the intent is to educate.

By giving reasons you are offering opinion on why it "might" be justified or viewed as accpetable.

 

[Thrawn]

It is neccessary for some dogs. Thus it will continue to happen regardless of all of this hoo-ha. They will just become more guarded about where and when they do it.

How is it necessary when it has already been established that dogs can do well without it?

That's your personal opinion. It in no way makes it a fact or any more valid than anyone elses opinion on the matter. You say the intent is to be cruel, I say the intent is to educate.

We all saw their behaviour. It is more than just "education", which is entirely redundant as it's actually not required. A guise if you will.

 

[Lebbo73]

what a load of s**t. you blood them you're a cheat. i hope you end up getting nabbed ya campaigner.

Please don't post your brainless, uneducated comments in this thread!

 

[Gough]

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/...brought-a-possum/story-fnn8dlfs-1227335121236
For an isolated example of a few bad eggs spoiling it for everyone else, blah blah blah, there sure seems to be a lot of trainers getting caught out here, and yet the "sport" continues completely unsanctioned.

 

[Lebbo73]

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/...brought-a-possum/story-fnn8dlfs-1227335121236
For an isolated example of a few bad eggs spoiling it for everyone else, blah blah blah, there sure seems to be a lot of trainers getting caught out here, and yet the "sport" continues completely unsanctioned.

This tells you that live baiting is a normal and natural technique for training greyhounds Gough. It is time for the do-gooders to take a back seat on this issue!

 

[04 Durif]

s**t article mentioned how a "staggering" 4 billion is spent betting on greyhounds each year. Like it's the devil. Get stuffed.

Obviously I disagree with live baiting but it's rare cases.

Of course it's rare they're still alive

 

[AM]

This tells you that live baiting is a normal and natural technique for training greyhounds Gough. It is time for the do-gooders to take a back seat on this issue!

Think you'll find it's actually not lawful.

 

[Lebbo73]

Think you'll find it's actually not lawful.

Don't you see the hypocrisy in all of this? A rabbit is a pest. This is where it should end!

 

[Maggie5]

Don't you see the hypocrisy in all of this? A rabbit is a pest. This is where it should end!

What about the pigs they were using and other animals?

 

[Lebbo73]

What about the pigs they were using and other animals?

Yeah, I agree they shouldn't be using pigs or possums (was it)? However, it is a minor issue in the scheme of things!

 

[Maggie5]

Yeah, I agree they shouldn't be using pigs or possums (was it)? However, it is a minor issue in the scheme of things!

Minor? Are you serious!!!

 

[Lebbo73]

Minor? Are you serious!!!

More than serious. If it was your pet, then I would be concerned. Otherwise, probably cruel but a minor detail.

 

[Maggie5]

More than serious. If it was your pet, then I would be concerned. Otherwise, probably cruel but a minor detail.

No senseless killing of animals is minor.

 

[cats2rise]

No senseless killing of animals is minor.

How do you figure that?

 

[Maggie5]

How do you figure that?

Thought what I said was pretty clear if you follow the previous posts.