- Nov 21, 2010
- 13,486
- 17,338
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Chelsea, Detroit Pistons
There is one I'm surprised hasn't gone yet
Monreal and Shaw the only ones I can think of off the top of my head.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is one I'm surprised hasn't gone yet
Not one gooner, 3 current and 1 former spurs playersFinal team
-------------de Gea
Clichy Demichelis Rojo Janmaat
-----------Herrera/Matic
Lamela-- ---Eriksen ----- Sigurdsson
-------------Kane
Something else to factor in is that i have 3 of the top 5 or 6 strikers in the league in my team. I haven't seen a team in my version with 2 excellent strikers. Could get hurt by a Silva or Di Maria tho.Playing with a back 3?
Not too sure how that would go against some of the attacks around here here.
Not one gooner, 3 current and 1 former spurs players
Something else to factor in is that i have 3 of the top 5 or 6 strikers in the league in my team. I haven't seen a team in my version with 2 excellent strikers. Could get hurt by a Silva or Di Maria tho.
I call friendship bias!
Call it draft tampering. The peanut barely new a player not at a top 6 club! Still thought Downing was playing LWI call friendship bias!
I wouldnt be talking up lamela and mane. Both are inconstant at this level thus far.In all seriousness though. The Matic-Sissoko CM pairing would be a nightmare to play against. Lamela-Mane 2 tricky wingers with hard working Gyfli & Kane. It's a very solid side. Oh and the best GK in the league too
When comparing to unbalanced sides with players playing out of natural positions or unworkable formations they'd have a field dayI wouldnt be talking up lamela and mane. Both are inconstant at this level thus far.
And so would other teams. Still not sure they would have a field day.When comparing to unbalanced sides with players playing out of natural positions or unworkable formations they'd have a field day
Up against a back 3 with wing-backs of Oxlade-Chamberlain & Barkley? A narrow diamond with the joke Fernandinho? Some of the more ridiculous I've seen so far!And so would other teams. Still not sure they would have a field day.
Haha jd goes whack to a couple teams there.Up against a back 3 with wing-backs of Oxlade-Chamberlain & Barkley? A narrow diamond with the joke Fernandinho? Some of the more ridiculous I've seen so far!
Actually ranking sides as I'm bored at work your's would come in ahead of lion's. Will post results once I've gone through them allHaha jd goes whack to a couple teams there.
I wouldnt be talking up lamela and mane. Both are inconstant at this level thus far.
So I decided to give players scores out of 10 based on their ranking in their positiion. Best in the position got a 9.5 in all spots except for CB where I gave a 9.0. Added up each of the XI's scores and then deducted 1 point for each flaw in formation or players not able to play the role.
Surprisingly close final scores:
1) [B]Sozabarus[/B] 87.5
2) [B]BluesMan[/B] 85.5
=3) lion4life & [B]Cruyff14[/B] 85
5) [B]Loonerty[/B] 84.5
=6) [B]ADL9798[/B] , Rustin Cohle & Shoei 83.5
9) [B]NFGKizza[/B] 82.5
10) [B]thorne89[/B] 79
11) [B]Tulip[/B] 78
12) [B]Bojan KantKick[/B] 77
Ranking the sides that way probably gives the more even sides a better score than most people would imagine. For instance the top side probably doesn't stand out to many at all because it lacks the big names. But the way I see it, it has 1 of the top 3 FB's, 1 of the top 3 DMs, 1 of the top 5 AMs & tops that up with decent players all over the pitch. Would much rather that sort of side than a side with bog average defenders and 3 of the top 5 strikers in it
They're mainly the ones posted when I had nothing to do at workInteresting that 9 of your top 12 came from Group 1.
Yeah, unfortunately, my team would put 7 past that defense and you're relying on Dzeko to finishImagine if someone had both
Krul
Ivanovic Mertesacker Coloccini Baines
Carrick Ramires
Silva Nasri Di Maria
Dzeko
Meh, each flaw in formation or players incapable of playing their role? Pretty subjective. Tell me where u took points off.So I decided to give players scores out of 10 based on their ranking in their positiion. Best in the position got a 9.5 in all spots except for CB where I gave a 9.0. Added up each of the XI's scores and then deducted 1 point for each flaw in formation or players not able to play the role.
Surprisingly close final scores:
1) Sozabarus 87.5
2) BluesMan 85.5
=3) lion4life & Cruyff14 85
5) Loonerty 84.5
=6) ADL9798 , Rustin Cohle & Shoei 83.5
9) NFGKizza 82.5
10) thorne89 79
11) Tulip 78
12) Bojan KantKick 77
Ranking the sides that way probably gives the more even sides a better score than most people would imagine. For instance the top side probably doesn't stand out to many at all because it lacks the big names. But the way I see it, it has 1 of the top 3 FB's, 1 of the top 3 DMs, 1 of the top 5 AMs & tops that up with decent players all over the pitch. Would much rather that sort of side than a side with bog average defenders and 3 of the top 5 strikers in it