Danny Cullen
Club Legend
- Banned
- #3,276
Thanks - your post is very informative
Your turn.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks - your post is very informative
Why is Pickering's opinion worth any less than Marr's?
Now if I were a beating man: http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/la...s-allegedly-lost/story-e6freuy9-1226167989738
LOL.Irrelevant.
Irrelevant.
The Senate is a joke. Working in self, rather than national, interest.
Just because Mr Abbott hasn't sold his soul, ala Gillard, doesn't mean they aren't sound means of getting this country back on track.
He has not credibility - David Marr has been a journalist and editor, qualified in law for forty years. Larry was a cartoonist who has been involved in a series of scams - the liquidator would not say the things he is saying if he did not have a case to answer. The other thing is that article is from the oracle of truth the Tele.
Haha good one, that's hilarious - Abbott may not be working in "self" interest but it's definitely not in the national interest - more the interest of his corporate cronies who stump up the money to get right wing ideologues like him elected.
Not really a fan of Gillard/ALP either but at least they're not complete neo-liberal extremists.
If you say so. For a man of the 'law' you sound very, very shallow.
From someone with all the depth of a piss puddle in the Sahara
Abbott can't sell his soul because he doesn't have one to start with. He has offered to sell his arse in the past though, so there's that
Typical trash talk.
So you deny that Abbott is driven by neo-liberal ideology? That he is more concerned with the interests of his corporate backers and lobbyists than the interests of every day Australians?
Now if I were a beating man: http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/la...s-allegedly-lost/story-e6freuy9-1226167989738
Yes.
Well you're wrong as evidenced by the numerous leaks coming out of the party in recent weeks. The guy is incapable of assessing things on their merits or making evidence based policy changes because it conflicts with the economic theories he read about at uni.
After 3.5 years surely the allegations are either proven of not by now.
The same could be said about a number of other political figures. Stops few.After 3.5 years surely the allegations are either proven of not by now.
The same could be said about a number of other political figures. Stops few.
persuasive stuffYes.
persuasive stuffIf you say so.
persuasive stuff
And yet you gave no reasons or arguments in support of it So in essence your Yes was purely suppositionI was asked a question and answered. Told I was wrong so dismissed the poster pronto. A yes or no question doesn't have to have a persuasive answer. Best you remember that.