Half Term Tony. Is it a possibility?

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Irrelevant.

He has not credibility - David Marr has been a journalist and editor, qualified in law for forty years. Larry was a cartoonist who has been involved in a series of scams - the liquidator would not say the things he is saying if he did not have a case to answer. The other thing is that article is from the oracle of truth the Tele.
 
The Senate is a joke. Working in self, rather than national, interest.

Just because Mr Abbott hasn't sold his soul, ala Gillard, doesn't mean they aren't sound means of getting this country back on track.

Haha good one, that's hilarious - Abbott may not be working in "self" interest but it's definitely not in the national interest - more the interest of his corporate cronies who stump up the money to get right wing ideologues like him elected.

Not really a fan of Gillard/ALP either but at least they're not complete neo-liberal extremists.
 
He has not credibility - David Marr has been a journalist and editor, qualified in law for forty years. Larry was a cartoonist who has been involved in a series of scams - the liquidator would not say the things he is saying if he did not have a case to answer. The other thing is that article is from the oracle of truth the Tele.

If you say so. For a man of the 'law' you sound very, very shallow.
 
Haha good one, that's hilarious - Abbott may not be working in "self" interest but it's definitely not in the national interest - more the interest of his corporate cronies who stump up the money to get right wing ideologues like him elected.

Not really a fan of Gillard/ALP either but at least they're not complete neo-liberal extremists.

Typical trash talk.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Typical trash talk.

So you deny that Abbott is driven by neo-liberal ideology? That he is more concerned with the interests of his corporate backers and lobbyists than the interests of every day Australians?

Not trash talk at all, in fact bang on the money - even the leaks out of his own party shows the concern the LNP has with his ideologically driven policies and refusal to review and alter them in the face of mounting backlash from the electorate.
 

Well you're wrong as evidenced by the numerous leaks coming out of the party in recent weeks. The guy is incapable of assessing things on their merits or making evidence based policy changes because it conflicts with the economic theories he read about at uni.
 
Well you're wrong as evidenced by the numerous leaks coming out of the party in recent weeks. The guy is incapable of assessing things on their merits or making evidence based policy changes because it conflicts with the economic theories he read about at uni.

If you say so.
 
The same could be said about a number of other political figures. Stops few.

How long did it take before someone was brave enough to take on Gillard and the AWU scandal.
 
I was asked a question and answered. Told I was wrong so dismissed the poster pronto. A yes or no question doesn't have to have a persuasive answer. Best you remember that.
And yet you gave no reasons or arguments in support of it So in essence your Yes was purely supposition
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top