Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 81,740
- 82,542
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
Indeed, based on salaries, Kozzie worth less than Chol.Richmond need to pay the trade price for a player they value with a 3yr contract.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 10
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Indeed, based on salaries, Kozzie worth less than Chol.Richmond need to pay the trade price for a player they value with a 3yr contract.
There is roughlly a trade round difference between the 2 imo.That depends entirely on 'chip in the difference'
I think that is insane personally.There is roughlly a trade round difference between the 2 imo.
My favourite part of trade week is where group think is the real arbiter of value.
It's like when I sold my house and decided to let a bunch of randoms on the internet decide the value, rather than figuring it out myself.
Chol is worth more than Kozzie, so Hawks are going to need to chip in the difference.
Why don’t you talk about Chol in the Chol thread?
Just came to see all the angst over Hawthorn asking for a top 25 pick for someone I think is an absolute potato.
That seems fair enough, I wonder whats holding it up.
Melb traded in a bloke who didn’t even play a game this year for pick 47.
but Kozi with a 3 year offer is worth the same
Why does it? I’ve not mentioned Chol’s value at all.Because talking about the Chol trade brings into question your premise that trade value should be determine by the length of contract being offered by the buyer.
Why does this apply when you are the seller and not the buyer ? Seems perfectly relevant to me.
You don't have to specifically mention something for someone to call out why your logic doesn't apply in that situation.Why does it? I’ve not mentioned Chol’s value at all.
That’s is one of the stupidest posts I’ve read on Bigfooty in all my years.You don't have to specifically mention something for someone to call out why your logic doesn't apply in that situation.
okThat’s is one of the stupidest posts I’ve read on Bigfooty in all my years.
Yes, so have we all. It's only certain Hawks fans on this board who have said otherwise, the "pay the price" types for a guy with fringe value.I said a 3rd rounder (or equivalent) would likely be the deal and that we will see that to be the case.
gobbledygook?That’s is one of the stupidest posts I’ve read on Bigfooty in all my years.
Which is?Deal apparently agreed on tonight.
Indeed, based on salaries, Kozzie worth less than Chol.
If we don’t get kosi I won’t be fussed.It would be best for Hawthorn to not trade with Richmond, who have acted bad faith throughout this whole process; offering a pick in the 60s is just insulting. Withdraw from the Chol debacle with the GC and re-negotiate a longer and higher $ for Koschitzke.
I've always believed that Koschitzke is a superior player to Chol, so see this as an outcome that would be in Hawthorn's best interests.