Traded Lewis Jetta [traded to West Coast for Callum Sinclair]

Remove this Banner Ad

kaiserchief13 said:
Facts are Jetta is out of contract. Eagles should offer Sinclair and 2nd round pick for Jetta and Swans first round pick. If Swans say no to that and want straight swap tell them to piss off and don't get Jetta.
Click to expand...
Agree you are in position of strength negotiating wise.

Due to Mills- no way we would consider losing 1st.

Very confident straight swap will get done and signed off friday.
 
kaiserchief13 said:
Facts are Jetta is out of contract. Eagles should offer Sinclair and 2nd round pick for Jetta and Swans first round pick. If Swans say no to that and want straight swap tell them to piss off and don't get Jetta.
Click to expand...
Bit of an over simplification. Pick 14 is currently needed for Mills, who is our #1 priority. Sinclair would be great but isn't crucial.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

kaiserchief13 said:
Enjoy screwing another one (O'Keefe) of your players of their wishes to move.
Click to expand...
Similar situation actually. ROK said he'd like to move, but when a deal couldn't be reached he re-signed.

Earned himself a premiership and Norm Smith medal. I don't think he's sad about it.
 
FreeAgent1 said:
Could just as easily get done for your 2 second rounders. Sinclar not needed. Back Naismith next year or try Suns for Smith.
Click to expand...
Nah tbh don't even want Jetta. Front runner that would do well downhill skiing but go missing again in finals next year. Certainly don't want him for anything more than 1 2nd round pick.
 
If at the start of this year you told me we could get jetta in a direct swap for sinclair i would have asked for some of whatever you were taking. How much a season can change things. The reality is Sydney are chasing sinclair on the back of his second half of the year in particular but im not sure if he's ever going to play better than that and we all know that Jetta's best is much better.

Jetta's worth at the moment is at it's lowest possible point due to a poor finals series (where he looked like he had already checked out) and through being uncontracted. Sinclair's value is at it's absolute zenith and we would be very silly to not do a direct swap however if it looks like we improve our draft position in any way as well then we should take it and run.
 
FreeAgent1 said:
Could just as easily get done for your 2 second rounders. Sinclar not needed. Back Naismith next year or try Suns for Smith.
Click to expand...
I would be happy to give up our second rounders for Jetta. I, too, think he will improve our team. If we are smack bang in the middle of a premiership window, we need to bring in players to compete for spots, while keeping our depth. If that means missing out on one weak draft, so be it. We have some talented kids from the last couple of years, which means I think we can afford to miss out on any high picks this year. Go back to the draft in a big way next year.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

kaiserchief13 said:
Enjoy screwing another one (O'Keefe) of your players of their wishes to move.
Click to expand...

Really screwed over by winning another Premiership and a Norm Smith Medal

O'Keefe was happy to stay and only didn't get to the Hawks due to the arrogant campaigner Pelchen's antics offering up nothing for an AA quality player.

In fact based on your posting\comments you aren't Chris by any chance are you?
 
zero said:
agreed, just like brown was, sinclair has way higher value to us as a listed player than his normal, uncontracted trade value. the eagles would be very happy to keep him on the list for next year.

so unless the trade for him is going to make them very, very happy, then its probably wiser to forget about him and try to figure something else out for jetta
Click to expand...
Or just forget about Jetta?

We shouldn't be afraid to walk away from that deal.
 
bungwahl said:
Bit of an over simplification. Pick 14 is currently needed for Mills, who is our #1 priority. Sinclair would be great but isn't crucial.
Click to expand...

Pick 14 isn't needed for Mills. The equivalent points are.

I think you will trade 14 for two picks in the 20s in a separate deal to the Jetta/Sinclair deal.
 
Suma Magic said:
Pick 14 isn't needed for Mills. The equivalent points are.

I think you will trade 14 for two picks in the 20s in a separate deal to the Jetta/Sinclair deal.
Click to expand...

On the Collingwood board they were saying there was preliminary talks already.

Though it could just bigfooty talk. Reckon it will happen
 
Suma Magic said:
Pick 14 isn't needed for Mills. The equivalent points are.

I think you will trade 14 for two picks in the 20s in a separate deal to the Jetta/Sinclair deal.
Click to expand...
Yep, as I said, pick 14 currently needed for Mills. We've had plenty of speculation about trading pick 14 for multiple lower round picks that give us more draft points which could well happen. Interestingly, none of the media types seem to be suggesting this as a potential option though.
 
Channel ten reporting Sinclair to Swans almost finalised. Not giving the details of the trade yet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Elmer_Judd
Traded Tyler Brockman [Traded to West Coast for #44 and #63]
54 55 56 57 58
Replies
1K
Views
67K
Elmer_Judd
Elmer_Judd
Taylor
Traded Melbourne trade #14, #27 and #35 to Gold Coast for #11
2
Replies
49
Views
2K
EagleMan87
EagleMan87
Taylor
Traded North Melbourne trade their 1st 2024 EoR1 pick to Gold Coast for #18
2
Replies
27
Views
2K
TerryWallet
T
Taylor
Traded Dogs trade #10, #17 and F1 to Gold Coast for #4, #46, #51 and F3
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
142
Views
6K
Caligo
Caligo
Elixuh
Traded Tom Fullarton - [Traded to Melbourne for #47]
2
Replies
29
Views
2K
Saab NLAW
S
Obeanie1
Traded Bigoa Nyuon [Traded to North for Pick #65]
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
Freomaniac
Freomaniac
Mofra
Traded Taylor Adams [traded to Sydney for pick #33]
7 8 9 10 11
Replies
265
Views
13K
RUNVS
RUNVS

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top