Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay so Picks 3 and 10 worth 3629 points
Pick 6 worth 1751 points
Difference = 1878 points which is pick 5 exactly
Melbourne gambling they will finish better than 14th next year and Gold Coast betting against that.
(assuming no compo picks, priority picks)
Helps a little but not that muchMore details:
Gold Coast traded out 3, 10, 43.
Melbourne out 2, 29, next year's first rounder.
Makes more sense. The fourteen pick upgrade helps.
I have no idea about what the talent is like for next years draft. But hypothetically if they were equivalent, pick 10 this year is more valuable than 7,8 or 9 next year, simply because you get access to the player a year earlier. Needs to be taken into calculations.7,8 or 9 next year is a lot more valuable than 10 this year.
like it from whose perspective?I like it.
I guess there is someone they really want? or worried them and Essendon have too similar tastes?One year a club is going to trade away their next year's first-rounder then finish on the bottom of the ladder. You'd think Melbourne will move upwards, but if the wheels fall off, boy will 2016 be an unimaginably bad year.
I would hate to see my club gambling its future first-rounder on a minor pick upgrade.
Both. I can't predict the future but I like that Melbourne has a plan, and that GC have put their balls on the line for a potential pay off. It's just good to see clubs trying something.like it from whose perspective?