Pick 4 on the table?

Remove this Banner Ad

41 & 53 are likely going to be gone in the next few days for Stephens and Fisher.

10, 17 and a F1 (Dogs) is better than

Ess F1, 27, 41, 47, 53

From GC perspective.

Essendon's problem in this trade is going to be the market the Dogs set for one of these picks. You can't get 4 (5) unless you match that offer, then still need to satisfy North.
 
Depending on what North are doing, a 3 way deal

North in: Picks 9,
North out: Picks 14 & 1 x 2024 end of 1st round compo pick

GC in: Picks 14, Crows F1, Crows picks 21 & 23
GC out: Pick 4

Crows: in Pick 4, North 2024 end of 1st round compo pick
Out: Picks 9, F1, 21 & 23
 
Depending on what North are doing, a 3 way deal

North in: Picks 9,
North out: Picks 14 & 1 x 2024 end of 1st round compo pick

GC in: Picks 14, Crows F1, Crows picks 21 & 23
GC out: Pick 4

Crows: in Pick 4, North 2024 end of 1st round compo pick
Out: Picks 9, F1, 21 & 23
Why not have North offer GC 14,19,and one of their 2024 Assistance picks 19 or 20 for Gc pick 4 and leave out Adelaide. less complicated.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

41 & 53 are likely going to be gone in the next few days for Stephens and Fisher.

10, 17 and a F1 (Dogs) is better than

Ess F1, 27, 41, 47, 53

From GC perspective.

Essendon's problem in this trade is going to be the market the Dogs set for one of these picks. You can't get 4 (5) unless you match that offer, then still need to satisfy North.
Gold Coast would prefer ESS F1 than Dogs imo

I still think the 10, 17 and F1 has to be in a 3 way trade with the crows or Blues F1 going to the suns for 10

2 Future 1st is going to be almost impossible to beat, though, i agree
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top