LuvtheKangas
Premium Platinum
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2006
- Posts
- 25,820
- Reaction score
- 66,886
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Are you the same 'utility' that gave the 3 votes to McIntosh in another thread?
:confused face thingy:
:confused face thingy:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
but at the other end, Riewoldt was beating two or three of our guys every time. Bit of a talent difference of course, but ultimately it comes down to mobility. Unfortunately the opposition always knows where Hale's marking contests are going to occur.
Can't get too enthusiastic over a player who continually plays from behind.
If you watched last night, he was getting double teamed every time Rawlings bombed it into the forward line. Could have easily kicked 5 goals.
It wasn't Hales fault, he is no Carey or Brown who can beat 3 opponents.
Gilbert and Blake all night were jumping infront of him whilst Dawson was behind.
Hale has been above average in the first two games.
For mine, his biggest problem is a lack of size. For somebody who is playing as a key target, if he is unable to take the contested mark, he should be battering the pack and bringing the ball to ground.....just not strong enough to achieve this I think.
Petrie is more of the bash n' crash player, Hale isn't. Not everyone is suited to playing that way.
You cant touch Riewoldt and Milne.they are protected species and unti they win a Premeirship thats the way it will stay.I was so angry last night but after a day in the Sun and some thought i realise that we are not up 2 it at the moment.I had high hopes this season but now understand that we have to travel down this road to get batter.Does not excuse what happened and atleast Hale kicked a few and he will have a quiet week on here.
I take the back route to the fish 'n' chip shop.
To me Hale just seems to be afraid of a contest, he doesnt chase, he hardly leads he just stands there shoulder to shoulder hoping the ball will land in his hands.
That said he was one of the best this week and earned a spot next week.
But do you always get a flogging before you get the fish?
To me Hale just seems to be afraid of a contest, he doesnt chase, he hardly leads he just stands there shoulder to shoulder hoping the ball will land in his hands.
That said he was one of the best this week and earned a spot next week.
Petrie is more of the bash n' crash player, Hale isn't. Not everyone is suited to playing that way.
The problem with Hale is he is far too stationary, if he moves, presents and plays in front more then it is hard for him to be scragged, he just engages in body contact too much and the umps then give a lot of leeway to the defender unless the forward is Reiwoldt.
The problem is Hale has no confidence in the supply or the delivery, he lead so many times only to be ignored by players not taking the first option.
He is no Coleman, but he can be useful if we can get the WWF out of Hale, he has no reason to hold or wrestle or push, he towers over most defenders.
The other problem is we need more options, other than Hale and Warren there is tumble weed blowing across our forward line, this allows the other defenders to focus on the only two guys that look like kicking a goal.




