![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/geelong.png)
Yes because lil Johnny Worsold was such a angel when he playedan is as plain as vanilla off it
This is true, he was dirty on field now he agrees with Selwood decision. He is a sook hey?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 15
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
Yes because lil Johnny Worsold was such a angel when he playedan is as plain as vanilla off it
Re: Roosy Drinking Game.
And you have to finish your drink every time he uses Sydney in an example or brings the topic around to Sydney unnecessarily.
I.e. "You just have to like how their defense works together, if you look at how a.. say Sydney does it they"
Or "He's a good free agent, youd think a... maybe a sydney would be interested"
Since when did he agree with thatThis is true, he was dirty on field now he agrees with Selwood decision. He is a sook hey?
Check his presser today for his view on itSince when did he agree with that
Whaaaat? At his press conference after the game he was asked about it and said that it was just brotherly love and should be outside of the MRP. So the opposite of what you said.This is true, he was dirty on field now he agrees with Selwood decision. He is a sook hey?
Like the prohibited front on contact to the head you mean?They didn't have to create a new rule because of anything worsfold did though.
So you're whinging about a possible whinge.Knowing Brad, he'll have a whinge about it tomorrow.
Link? The only footage ive seen he says the opposite and that it shouldn't be looked at by the mrp.Check his presser today for his view on it
That rule has nothing to do with worsfold so dont know why you bring it up. The injured player protection rules were brought in specifically due to dog act by scott and michaels.Like the prohibited front on contact to the head you mean?
And yet Brad's team sits higher on the ladder than Chris's.yeah, in terms of pressers brad loves to bitch and moan, maybe hes just been deflecting because his team has lost a lot more games than chris's, and now that chris's great team is gently sliding off into the night he is starting up the old deflection excuses motor.
for what its worth i had alot of time for chris before the events of the last week
Oh you mean the Friday night presser, where he laughed at it and called them brothers. That 360 clip is from Friday just in case you missed what I said.Check his presser today for his view on it
They didn't have to create a new rule because of anything worsfold did though.
Nope got nothing to do with John what so everThat rule has nothing to do with worsfold so dont know why you bring it up. The injured player protection rules were brought in specifically due to dog act by scott and michaels.
Pretty sure all of those were legal/eyes on the ball and the kind of football people always talk about wanting to see. Also, the first hit was Woosha getting hit and getting up like a man. Just increased my respect for the manNope got nothing to do with John what so ever
Nope got nothing to do with John what so ever
And yet Brad's team sits higher on the ladder than Chris's.![]()
Still waiting to hear what worsfold said about the selwood decision??Check his presser today for his view on it
No wonder. Chalk and cheese. Riewoldt had a dislocated shoulder. Adam Selwood was winded for 20 seconds. Scott was probably wondering WTFDidn't catch the end bit.
Loved how he was speechless after Gerard brought up about the time Mal Michael and one of the Scott boys went after an injured player in Riewoldt, and now his clubs captain is up for the same thing.
Nope got nothing to do with John what so ever