Combined Kurt Tippett contract negotiation/trade possibility thread
- Thread starter BrisbaneLion9636
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
And assuming your theory is correct and he did sign a contract with GC 12 months ago?
Even if he's actually happy with the prospect of two-three clubs we're in a decent position
as long as it's not code for 'i'll only accept the gold coast and they'll do a deal to get me PSD if you don't send me there' we should emerge ok
Assume we'd get at least an established player+a pick upgrade for him
as long as it's not code for 'i'll only accept the gold coast and they'll do a deal to get me PSD if you don't send me there' we should emerge ok
Assume we'd get at least an established player+a pick upgrade for him
Drugs Are Bad Mackay?
Moderator
- May 24, 2006
- 77,392
- 152,133
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Redbacks, Sturt, Liverpool, Arizona
- Moderator
- #6,607
You serious?
You don't think that naming a club would give them the stronger trading position?
Trolls about shiny new toys..
Leaves a few days later..
Leaves a few days later..
Christ, I'd love to know if this is true.
I almost hope it is - I'd have a bit more respect for Kurt if it were; but they way he's handled, and handling, this, is absolutely woeful.
The Managers earn a lot of money from these players - isn't PR management part of their job? Because they've ballsed this up completely.
- Apr 18, 2010
- 7,542
- 6,041
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- NorwoodFC, Chic Bulls, Gldn State
Has been all year and Kurt knew it.Tex, it's your forward line now.
- Apr 18, 2010
- 7,542
- 6,041
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- NorwoodFC, Chic Bulls, Gldn State
Tex can burn down his house seeing Kurt's not going to need it now.
Hope this is the case.
If he hasn't named a team because he's actually trying to avoid screwing us over, then it's must appreciated; but I'll still be filthy if he goes to anywhere but QLD.
He'll have to join the queue
- Apr 18, 2010
- 7,542
- 6,041
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- NorwoodFC, Chic Bulls, Gldn State
Torches and pitchforks Simpsons style.
So did Kurt come home and front the Club?
Slippery Pete's 'Crows need to become arseholes,' theory needs to get put into motion right now.
Kurt has released his statement - now we need to release ours; we will decide where he goes, based upon whoever offers US the best deal; not Kurt.
Slippery Pete's 'Crows need to become arseholes,' theory needs to get put into motion right now.
Kurt has released his statement - now we need to release ours; we will decide where he goes, based upon whoever offers US the best deal; not Kurt.
Thanks for playing everyone! AFGM, since I've hounded you a fair bit in this thread, I'll give you props for predicting the date of the announcement almost a fortnight out.
For the sake of allowing those who haven't had the misfortune of following this miserable thread the option of participating in the ensuing discussion, please direct your posts to the new thread: http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/tippetts-gone.975955/
Thread closed.
For the sake of allowing those who haven't had the misfortune of following this miserable thread the option of participating in the ensuing discussion, please direct your posts to the new thread: http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/tippetts-gone.975955/
Thread closed.
You are wrong. Clubs have always been able to have more than 2 rookies, it's just that you can only have two "outside rookies" - in those 2 positions reserved for rookies & veterans. You can have as many "inside veterans" as you like.
What's more, the AFL have broadened the eligibility criteria for veterans, so that any player with 10+ years of service is eligible for veteran listing. Previously they also had to be aged 30+. This now opens veteran listing up to players aged 28 & 29, effectively doubling the number of eligible players overnight.
- Status
