Wouldn't matter if the swan$ got Lockett and Tagh Kennelly back. 12 goal loss incoming![]()
Difference is that Hannebery is not around 36 and 50+ respectively

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Wouldn't matter if the swan$ got Lockett and Tagh Kennelly back. 12 goal loss incoming![]()

Yeah nah. You're all easily as arrogant. Possibly more.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Haha it took a while for someone to pick up on that. If you watch my posts you'll always see something like that thrown in for good measure (and a few laughs)Unbearable, really??? I, like most fans of any team, love schadenfreude! It is very enjoyable to sit back to appreciate the spectacle of the losing teams fans start 'whirling around in self-destruct mode'. However, we are all guilty of this, but some posters on BigFooty just don't stop!
Cheers
Justice
You guys are in great form at the moment but you have Freo at Freo (most likely loss), Sydney (50 50), Geelong (50 50) and Adelaide in Adelaide (most likely win but no one would be surprised if you lose as the Crows are starting to look good). If you lose 3 more games then you won't make top four.Hawks should be fine now. It's unprecedented that they have won the last 5 games, and further to that won them by an average of 5 goals plus. You could still make an argument about injuries but the reality is that the depth is better than expected and team selection isn't as clear cut as first expected.
That's not true. You still have Freo, Geelong and Collingwood to come after that. Lose two games for the rest of the year and you kiss top two good bye. Lose three and you kiss top four goodbye. Port will only lose 1 more game for the year with their draw and Freo will only lose a maximum of 2 and probably less then that.Outside of their match v North at SS, the Cats haven't looked convincing for the past 2 months.
If the Hawks win their next 3 (Nth-Adel-Syd) we'll finish top 2.
That's not true. You still have Freo, Geelong and Collingwood to come after that. Lose two games for the rest of the year and you kiss top two good bye. Lose three and you kiss top four goodbye. Port will only lose 1 more game for the year with their draw and Freo will only lose a maximum of 2 and probably less then that.
You're always going to drop a game unexpectedly but weather or not Hawthorn win or lose from here, I expect they will go in favourites in all of their remaining games. If they have won against the odds and come so close to the challengers despite being undermanned, then it should be 'expected' that we win those big games.
Mitchell is back this week and Gibson is closer than expected. Chris Fagan said Gibson wants to play v Crows but will be held back until after the bye against Sydney. So seemingly by the time we hit Sydney we should be close enough to full strength.
Hawthorn will probably finish top 2, have them at lowest 3rd in my predictions, but your logic is terrible. How does winning against the odds versus 'challengers' assure wins in 'big games'? And Hawthorn lost to Sydney and Geelong - were they not big games? (that makes 2 losses for the rest of the year if the result stays the same). Being expected to win is not a reason in and of itself for winning, I would've thought the 2012 grand final would've been enough to convince you of that.
In fairness those 5 games have been GWS, West Coast, Carlton, Gold Coast and Collingwood - the first 4 of which were over $4 to win those respective games, and Hawthorn also has a very dominant record over Collingwood.Just to clarify I said winning against the odds, (as in our last 5 games) and come close to the challengers (Port and Sydney). So my logic is that now that we will have a much stronger side come those challengers, we will be expected to beat them.
As you say expectation is fraught with danger, but I don't think any Hawthorn supporter thought we'd come through the last 5 games without a loss.
You're always going to drop a game unexpectedly but weather or not Hawthorn win or lose from here, I expect they will go in favourites in all of their remaining games. If they have won against the odds and come so close to the challengers despite being undermanned, then it should be 'expected' that we win those big games.
In fairness those 5 games have been GWS, West Coast, Carlton, Gold Coast and Collingwood - the first 4 of which were over $4 to win those respective games, and Hawthorn also has a very dominant record over Collingwood.
None of those wins were unexpected to me
So what is everyone predicting the top 4 to be?
Port
Hawks
Freo
Sydney
???
Might be in for a surprise there folks...

Port have lost Trengrove & Carlisle for 3 weeks.
I'd back Essendon this week, regardless of the venue.
of course you would. Clurey will come in and do a job. Still have Jonas and Hombsch and Hoff can go back. Not ideal but i back us to bounce back.Port have lost Trengrove & Carlisle for 3 weeks.
I'd back Essendon this week, regardless of the venue.
of course you would. Clurey will come in and do a job. Still have Jonas and Hombsch and Hoff can go back. Not ideal but i back us to bounce back.
Just to clarify I said winning against the odds, (as in our last 5 games) and come close to the challengers (Port and Sydney). So my logic is that now that we will have a much stronger side come those challengers, we will be expected to beat them.
As you say expectation is fraught with danger, but I don't think any Hawthorn supporter thought we'd come through the last 5 games without a loss.