Defacto
Brownlow Medallist
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Posts
- 22,930
- Reaction score
- 17,129
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
He won't? Carlisle + whipping boy Melksham for pick 5 seems like a good outcome.
nope, read the article. says you wont cough up pick 25
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

He won't? Carlisle + whipping boy Melksham for pick 5 seems like a good outcome.
can't do that for an out of contract player
Can Essendon pay part of Carlisle's contract next year?
You can actually, Essendon gets Carlisle to sign a new contract, so that he is contracted. Then trade a contracted Carlisle to the Hawks.
Carlisle would need to know that the trade would go through though.
You just need to be creative.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I think we'd cop $100k to get better trade, but I'm not sure we can do that with an OOC player. I think Hawks will get it close enough because Carlisle management are realising if there is no trade there is ZERO chance he's still there at pick 5 in PSD.I think it might head that way. If i'm the dons I offer to pay part of Jake's contract to make it easier for the hawks and convince him to go there.
It's as annoying as Saints fans thinking you can price someone out of the market with front loadingU can only pay part of the contract is he is CONTRACTED...FFS how hard is it to understand?
Are you sure?
Prefer to keep 5 & try for the hail mary of Carlisle in the PSD
Are you sure?
Dodoro must be pretty confident.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
that wont pass ken wood at all, just like the tippett trade didnt
I don't think Dodoro would go so hard if he was confident of either getting the 5 from Saints or Jake agreeing to go to Hawks.If that happens then maybe Dodoro gets sacked and everyone wins.
yes LOL

You really think Carlton and Brisbane are going to let him pass?so are the saints btw. history shows they except for nick stevens always get to their club of choice
You really think Carlton and Brisbane are going to let him pass?
Dodoro is a brave man if he has indeed rejected pick ten.
Pretty confident there.yeap brisbane will not pick a player that doesnt wnat to be there on that coin. their cap is full anyways
3m over 2 years. prices everyone out easily.
Pretty confident there.
Is it really that hard to work out what I was saying there? You clearly haven't understood one bit of it and then you've gone on a rant! Well done.
What I was saying is that if that trade went through (Carlisle for pick 10) you would still have 23 and 25 left, which you may then be able to package up and trade to say GWS for pick 8, which would mean you finish up with picks 4, 8 and 10, a fantastic result.
On the other hand, if you reject this deal and keep on insisting on getting pick 5 off us, you will almost certainly have to give up one of those two early 20's picks, as well as Carlisle, in order for us to be willing to trade pick 5. That then most likely eliminates the option of trading for GWS's pick 8 and leaves you with only one of 23 or 25, meaning you end up with 4, 5 and 23/25, rather than 4, 8 and 10, which is what you might be able to leave with if you accept the deal that was suggested earlier today.
Surely that's not that hard to comprehend?
HAWTHORN would be prepared to restructure its player payments to fit in Jake Carlisle as Essendon stands firm on its trade demands.
The Hawks remain keen on Carlisle and will attempt to zero in if the Saints and Bombers cannot agree to a deal by Thursday afternoon.
The reigning premiers privately are confident Carlisle has not ruled out Waverley as a new home next season.
The Herald Sun has confirmed Hawthorn has room to accommodate Carlisle in its salary cap with some manoeuvring of other deals, after the retirements of veterans Brian Lake and David Hale.
Unless Essendon buckles, Carlisle will have to reconsider joining Hawthorn or entering the preseason draft, where Carlton could snaffle the big man with pick No.1.
I'm assuming 15+18 will still be on the table?