DemonTim
Cancelled
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2013
- Posts
- 11,363
- Reaction score
- 8,296
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
That's hardly blaming Dane swan for martin. Seems she's just linking their relationship, that's been happening in the media for months
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

That's hardly blaming Dane swan for martin. Seems she's just linking their relationship, that's been happening in the media for months
Correct. It certainly makes me question my position on some of the things Melbourne, Sydney, Essendon and Adelaide have claimed about their dealings with these clowns. I'm glad the whistle has been blown on this one. Richmond are by no means in the clear over this cover up either.
KB might just get his wish now as the only way the AFL proves these allegations are not correct is by smoking Martin with a crushing suspension.
I hope Erin Riley and the fright bats go to town on the AFL about their hypocrisy towards the treatment of women. This is simply disgusting! The fans (females in particular) need to smash the AFL and Richmond over this. It's time to draw a line in the sand about their filthy cover ups and back room deals!
Who the HUN or the AFL or both, that article has a total of two very small quotes, so its hard to know if it is more of the HUNS usual rubbish or not?
No, you cut quote before you finished her sentence. She wasn't referring to Swan being the bad influence on Dusty, she was referring to Dusty and Swan potentially being a bad influence for Marley Williams.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
not really. She made a tenuous link and its up to the reader to draw that conclusion.The most embarrassing article by Wilson was indirectly blaming Dane Swan for leading Martin astray.
As much as I loathe Panahi, she wouldn't go to that level of detail unless she knew for sure.Who the HUN or the AFL or both, that article has a total of two very small quotes, so its hard to know if it is more of the HUNS usual rubbish or not?
Where's the strong level of detail you speak of in the article?As much as I loathe Panahi, she wouldn't go to that level of detail unless she knew for sure.
Richmond and the AFL have disgraced themselves if even half of that is true.
It also emerged last night that independent witnesses had contacted the AFL and downplayed the woman’s version of events.
The conflicting account — and the seriousness of the allegations — influenced the league’s decision to refer the matter to police.
Not really. Police investigation will gather the facts and determine exactly what happened.
Nice try Rita but your a terrible ******* excuse for a journalist. They didnt want it in the media to stop all the horseshit thats going on right now
how is it a deflection? Rita is the worst excuse for a journalist ive ever seen. Her claims? thats funny, Tom says. Not herNice deflection. But the woman has verified those claims on 3AW.
Tom Elliott said the woman had told him she felt like she'd been encouraged to water down her version of events.
Tom said the woman had told him she felt aggrieved and undermined by the AFL.
3AW stated she thought her story wasn't been treated as seriously as she wanted. It's good the police investigation is underway as they will validate her claims along with all the other witnesses coming forward and seeing the event.Nice deflection. But the woman has verified those claims on 3AW.
Let me stop you there, then. Show me where Dusty has admitted that it happened as alleged and we're all good; you can say what you like about the bloke.Against my better judgement, I'll take the bait. Unlike Martin's case, it's an allegation they deny even happened. (Same with Daw case).
Probably where he apologised.Let me stop you there, then. Show me where Dusty has admitted that it happened as alleged and we're all good; you can say what you like about the bloke.
One can apologise without agreeing to what's alleged to have occurred. Which funnily enough is what seems to have occurred here.Probably where he apologised.
Because he's a rich celebrity? Kidding? Have you seen the legal system lately? They slap nobodies with a wet lettuce leaf for assault. If anything he's going to be treated more harshly to send a message
Methinks an offence with a ten year jail term as possible punishment would fail the "not too serious" test.https://www.legalaid.vic.gov.au/fin...omes-for-criminal-offences/diversion-programs
The judge won't be swayed because he's a footballer, the accusations against him carry a very hefty sentence if found guilty, and the judge is having a bad day, Diversion program is pretty much what Martin will be looking at for his indiscretion if it ever gets to the courts.
What precisely are you basing this claim on?One can apologise without agreeing to what's alleged to have occurred. Which funnily enough is what seems to have occurred here.
Wow, the denial is strong in this one!!One can apologise without agreeing to what's alleged to have occurred. Which funnily enough is what seems to have occurred here.
He can't remember! [emoji1]What precisely are you basing this claim on?
