Remove this Banner Ad

2016 Non-Crows AFL Discussion - Cont. in Part 2 (link in OP)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rotayjay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's a pretty poor post. His initial post said unlucky for Dixon.

Uh huh, of course it did. There was completely no jealousy and schadenfreude involved at all!
 
Uh huh, of course it did. There was completely no jealousy and schadenfreude involved at all!
Trying to interpret posts in the worst possible light hey? Are you Alex?
 
Uh huh, of course it did. There was completely no jealousy and schadenfreude involved at all!
You are a w***er.

Mod edit - If you do engage opposition supporters, don't break the rules yourselves.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Realistically missing that much preseason will mean he's not right for round 1. If he plays round 1 it smacks of desperation. The season is long. He needs to get it right.

How Port handle this will be a semaphore to their mindset about this season.
 
So both knees are shit? good thing Burgo got his hands on him early to turn his injury-ravaged career around. That blokes truly a magician, best in the business.
No no that's not right.







It's both ankles which are shit.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I wish Charlie Dixon a speedy recovery however missing training time over February and March often leads to problems later in the season. I am thinking of heading over to Vanuatu until Easter so I don't hear any bad news from West Lakes :D.

You might have to sail over there, as the major airlines have suspended all flights there due to their airport's runway being deemed unsafe.
 
Dixon averages around 12-14 games per season and seems to cop a knee and ankle injury with each of his seasons
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

You might have to sail over there, as the major airlines have suspended all flights there due to their airport's runway being deemed unsafe.

You may have missed the earlier Vanuatu discussions in 2014. Long term posters would be aware that AFGM has his own Albatross.

Regarding Charlie, it is symptomatic of the Tealster culture that as soon as there is bad news a flock of Tealsters descend on our Board, like seagulls hungry for chips, hoping to find something to feed their "we are the victims" mentality. I can't recall a heap of Hawk fans annoying us when we were discussing the impact of Rougie's knee.
 
Last edited:
bet they'll ask for another top up player for charlie

Well being completely serious, I'd be far more sympathetic to clubs seeking a "top up" for injured players than I am to topping up lists to cover players who have taken part in a systematic doping program.

It gives me the absolute sh1ts that the AFL is in damage control over this and their principle concern is the competition and the dollar, and they are going out of their way to support Essendon and the players who are guilty. Where's the strong messages from the AFL hierarchy regarding PED's?

The rookie list is to "top up" the main list in the event of a long term injury. If you don't get a "top up" rookie when one is elevated for a long term injury, why should you get one to replace a drug cheat?

I really won't be too surprised if the AFL allows the Power, Saints, Melbourne and the Bullies "top up rookies", as this follows form and their soft on drugs approach they have taken to date.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom