Remove this Banner Ad

News AFL trade, free agency and draft. "who goes where?" - No freakin' hypotheticals

  • Thread starter Thread starter grizzlym
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just reported on Fox Footy Trade Show that we have offered pick 10 and pick 48 for Jaegar, which has been rejected.

According to Jake Niall, it's at a stalemate and mediation is becoming a real possibility as no player wants to go there.

Hawks don't have much else to offer, unless another club gets involved. And even. Then, we don't have much to give that club (player?).

If Suns got 6 from Richmond and 10 from Hawthorn, surely that would be enough for them to attract a gun from somewhere? Although they are running out of time...
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

No doubt Clarko spoke very well.

One thing kept nagging me was that this piece of the jigsaw wasn't fitting perfectly with with what Graham Wright's was saying.

GW has said how unhappy he was to lose Lewis and would maybe have done things differently if he had his time again.

I have no issue with letting these players go but am miffed and the massive unders we accepted, particularly for Lewis.

I'm yet to see a quote of GW actually saying that, and I've looked. I've seen where people have read between the lines but all I've ever actually hear him say is that he wished the club still had Lewis.

That would be Lewis on a one year deal. With no certainty of further deals or position. So the club let him go when Lewis asked to go.

That's a whole lot different that conceding the Lewis trade was a giant, regretful clusterfark.
 
Anyone sensing that GW might just be hoping that GCS don't do the trade. It is a 'face saver' for GCS and most welcomed outcome for us.

How so? I'm genuinely curious. I don't see how failing to trade benefits either of the clubs or JOM.
 
I'm yet to see a quote of GW actually saying that, and I've looked. I've seen where people have read between the lines but all I've ever actually hear him say is that he wished the club still had Lewis.

I thought he said "he may have handled it differently" on Nine news tonight, nothing about wanting Lewis to stay. I took that as managing the info/announcement/responses not necessarily his actual trade. Only GW knows what he thinks.
 
I think we may have stuffed up here

Surely we could have offered to Gold Coast what we swapped pick 10 for?
I think we must have, but GC must have said they weren't interested in next years pick, and we needed to get a pick for this year.
Bet they wish for their time again though
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I think we may have stuffed up here

Surely we could have offered to Gold Coast what we swapped pick 10 for?

I think we traded for pick 10 because GC were being very unreasonable in their requests last week so we (wrighty) thought outside the square and as a result did what we had to do too get pick 10 knowing that either GC took pick 10 from us or we would take him in the draft as no other Melbourne club had a pick inside 10 willing to use.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I feel like we should have kept pick 36 in that swap with St Kilda. Either offer GC Pick 10 and 36 or package a player + 36 to get a higher draft pick from another club and offer that to GC with pick 10.
 
How so? I'm genuinely curious. I don't see how failing to trade benefits either of the clubs or JOM.
It is no longer about what is a fair trade. They know they ain't getting much better than what is now on the table (which is less than what was previously offered). The ego will not allow it and I hope this us the case.

Wrighty can just turnaround and say 'not my fault, I tried' and then if we genuinely are building a war chest, the PSD for a big sum is achievable. The Bombers don't have the cap space.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom