moha919
Debutant
Obviously you didn't read it because that isn't the crux of what is being argued.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Obviously you didn't read it because that isn't the crux of what is being argued.
Oh gee I forgot the gyou have not read our thread.
what are our reasons for wanting what we did? why do we value him so highly? why do think so little of the crows efforts. why was it better to keep him fro our overall development. Actually read and comprehend before trying to engage - unless of course you cant understand?
you've read nothing. all your points have been answered multiple times alas your just trying to lift your post count up.
And when did our list Manager change his name?

The GWS player GWS actually wanted to keep? Bit of a difference don't you think?
Actually Marchbank is probably one they would have gone either way with,so one out of nine....Silvagni,what a guru.You don't think GWS wanted to keep Marchbank?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Actually Marchbank is probably one they would have gone either way with,so one out of nine....Silvagni,what a guru.
Nope. You don't know what you're talking about. GWS certainly did not want to lose Marchbank.
As for nine players, wrong again. SOS has brought in seven players from GWS and is using the little currency he has - list and salary cap space - to get discounts on targeted players. It's a smart strategy while the Blues list is in a state of transition. You don't think it's smart, which is fine, but you've already proven you don't actually know much about it.
I don't think most people appreciate nor understand what was done and why, in respect to the GWS players..........some Carlton supporters included.
A couple are likely to drop off at next years end, whilst we maintained our minimum TPP through the course of the last 2 years.
Great strategy as far as I'm concerned and in the meantime we also hauled in at least 3 best 22 players, whilst losing very little at the trade table.
By the way: What has all this got to do with Gibbs, anyway?
Darthbards is the one who started a rubbish rumour about SOS and Bolton feuding over SOS bringing in GWS 'duds'. He is on an anti-SOS crusade and drops it into most threads when Carlton are mentioned.

makes you wonder!!
Which is what I've been harping on about - Reid's biggest mistake was the early announcement. Let his ego get in the way of a deal. The man needs to learn the nuance of negotiation.People also don't get that GWS were holding out for the Gibbs trade to get that pick for Marchbank. The net result would have been Gibbs for Geelong's 2017 1st rounder which does nothing for our immediate development.
People also don't get that GWS were holding out for the Gibbs trade to get that pick for Marchbank. The net result would have been Gibbs for Geelong's 2017 1st rounder which does nothing for our immediate development.
Which is what I've been harping on about - Reid's biggest mistake was the early announcement. Let his ego get in the way of a deal. The man needs to learn the nuance of negotiation.
Lol,since when are Carlton 'big boys'? It's not the VFL anymore,in the AFL world Carlton are as close to a nothing club as there is,and their continual performances and decisions reflect this.
Anyway,not sure either club was rag dolled around. Carlton were being greedy and Adelaide weren't that interested in paying overs for a good kind of player who is a long,long way from being great or worth what was being asked.
"They [the officials] were obviously a bit shocked and took a bit of time to digest it. They didn't want me to go, but they respected my decision. They were happy to facilitate a trade, but it had to be the right one and they weren't going to go out of their way to get something done. Whoever wanted that trade had to come to them with a pretty significant deal and while they were happy to do it, they weren't going to go and push for it. But they made that clear from the start."
But after weeks of bartering, Adelaide never really came close to satisfying Carlton's requirements. And the conclusion to the drawn-out saga was for Gibbs complicated by the fact that as trade period concluded, he was on a flight to the United States for a holiday with half-a-dozen of what for all he knew, might now be former teammates.
[*]its been something being considered for 12 months which supports my theory from day one that crows have been trying to destabilize like they did with eddie, for the last year or so.
Mate, Eddie was un-contracted at the end of 2013 and, as was Daisy Thomas who your club was balls deep into getting and got, would you call that destabilization also?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Daisy wasn't playing as he was injured. Crows were in to Eddie 18 months out.
If Gibbs still wants to go at the end of '17 and has had a similar year to '16, woud be more than happy to let him go for a pick in the teens and some steak knives.
He may well be 'encouraged' out the door if it hypothetically gave us the best shot at acquiring one or more of Hopper, Shiel or Wright.
- the complete buy in translates to improving his own standards which means there is plenty of upside in young gibba.
What's being injured got to do with anything? Carlton would have been stuck into Daisy for a long time also!
There was nothing to destabilise.
Ok, so by your theory, Hawthorn destabilized Sydney, who finished minor premiers and played in the GF, by going after Tom Mitchell. Would I be correct in saying that as they where stuck into him for 18 months also?