- Banned
- #3,801
I'm sure you can think of another topic to post about if you try really hard.
I tried, i really did Stifler.
But nothing comes to mind at the moment. I think Jy Simpkin is a gun if that helps?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

I'm sure you can think of another topic to post about if you try really hard.
Then why is he not rebuilding/resetting? Our team is consistently around the 8th or 9th most experienced and we have lost to sides this season who are less experienced than us. If he has a licence to rebuild then why is he not doing it?
There is no evidence of this considering that our last build under this coach was a failure, without a single top 4 H&A finish.
No evidence that he's learning from his mistakes either. So far this season is almost a mirror image of 2013.
I've seen this myth posited by a few people who are pleased with the way we're heading. And it is a myth. Also a straw man response to many well reasoned arguments about our selection.
Very few people are suggesting that we field a team with 10 or 11 18/19 year olds. Most reasonable people simply just want to see old, underperforming players replaced with younger guys who are in good form in the VFL or in the pre-season. It would make us better in the short term, less experienced and would also contribute to the rebuild/reset.
How exactly will replacing, say, Swallow, Thomas, and Thompson with a combination of Clarke, Anderson, Wagner, Mountford and Durdin turn our competitive losses into 100 point smashings? I'll give you a hint, it wouldn't. In fact, it might even make us a better side in the short term, turning a few of those close losses into wins, as well as undeniably making us better in the long term.
No it's not the best case scenario, we're persisting with old players who aren't contributing now and have no place in our future. If they were still alright now despite having little chance of being part of our future success then I don't have a problem with them being selected. ie. Gibson. It's not the best case scenario to pay lip service to a rebuild by giving debutantes one game then casting them to the curb, imploring they work on their deficiencies in the VFL while older players are given continued leeway to fix their limitations in the seniors.
Agreed, he should be judged on his record in the last 18 matches, which sits at 3 wins, his deplorable record in close matches, and his inability to hold on to 5 goal leads.
He should be judged on his garbage rhetoric where he blames a rookie team, despite the side he picks being nothing of the sort.
He should be judged on his last 8 years where he has had plenty of time to build a list yet couldn't coach a team to be consistently good enough throughout the Home and Away season to finish in a top 4 position and give us a genuine shot at a flag, despite finals performances demonstrating that the talent on the list was clearly there.
apprenticeship in the past (and successful) for young players was best served when each club had their own U19's team, of which players the progressed to the reserves who the progressed to seniors. Clubs had absolute control of all their players grooming.......what a great day out at the footy that was, 3 games. All teams played in from of very large crowds which lifted on field performance because U19's had seniors watching, same for reserves would have senior team watching which also lifted their individual performances. U19's & reserves players then watched together, the senior team play, a great visual aspect for all players. Nowadays no U19's, Reserves will be in VFL that will play elsewhere on a different day, no real club or team association etc.I massively respect you opinion KS and think you post some great stuff but I would have to respectfully disagree with you on this. I believe doing a solid apprenticeship in the VFL is likely to make the younger players better prospects long term. Giving the young players one game in the seniors then sending them back to the VFL is a good strategy. It gives them encouragement that they are close to selection but exposes and reinforces their deficiencies which they can then go back to the VFL and work on. It also makes them hungry and desperate to get another chance. To use an EPL analogy, I believe Harry Kane has hugely benefited from his loan spells in League 1 in the Championship early in his Tottenham career. He's such a mature and composed player now and has huge confidence in his ability...Would that be the case if he played in Spurs 1st side from the get go....I'm not so sure. Compare that to someone like Saido Berahino who had it all too young and too early...He got ahead of himself and fell out with the club and coach. Look at him now, he is a burnt out shell, a shadow of the player he once was. Two years ago I thought he would be a great signing for Spurs but now I wouldn't touch him with a bargepole...Young players can get ahead of themselves. There's nothing wrong with making them really work for senior games. Mountford and Durdin were poor in their debuts but I'm tipping that next time they get a chance they'll make a better fist of it. That's what happened with Dumont, in and out for a little while, now he's an automatic selection in midfield and held his own against Nat Fyfe.
Aint that the truth......Remember how good Norths U19's used to be?apprenticeship in the past (and successful) for young players was best served when each club had their own U19's team, of which players the progressed to the reserves who the progressed to seniors. Clubs had absolute control of all their players grooming.......what a great day out at the footy that was, 3 games. All teams played in from of very large crowds which lifted on field performance because U19's had seniors watching, same for reserves would have senior team watching which also lifted their individual performances. U19's & reserves players then watched together, the senior team play, a great visual aspect for all players. Nowadays no U19's, Reserves will be in VFL that will play elsewhere on a different day, no real club or team association etc.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Spare me, a reason not to watch! it will only be same old, same old, nothing new or worth listening to. has all the words, unfortunately nothing to back up, same when the players are interviewed, they say all the right & good things, but unable to back-up.Scotts is on Footy Classified tonight
From recollection we were always up there in the McLelland trophy standings.
Hopefully he gets grilled a bitSpare me, a reason not to watch! it will only be same old, same old, nothing new or worth listening to. has all the words, unfortunately nothing to back up, same when the players are interviewed, they say all the right & good things, but unable to back-up.
How funny one Scott undefeated 2nd on the ladder and the other Scott with out a win 2nd last ...
Then why is he not rebuilding/resetting? Our team is consistently around the 8th or 9th most experienced and we have lost to sides this season who are less experienced than us. If he has a licence to rebuild then why is he not doing it?
There is no evidence of this considering that our last build under this coach was a failure, without a single top 4 H&A finish.
No evidence that he's learning from his mistakes either. So far this season is almost a mirror image of 2013.
I've seen this myth posited by a few people who are pleased with the way we're heading. And it is a myth. Also a straw man response to many well reasoned arguments about our selection.
Very few people are suggesting that we field a team with 10 or 11 18/19 year olds. Most reasonable people simply just want to see old, underperforming players replaced with younger guys who are in good form in the VFL or in the pre-season. It would make us better in the short term, less experienced and would also contribute to the rebuild/reset.
How exactly will replacing, say, Swallow, Thomas, and Thompson with a combination of Clarke, Anderson, Wagner, Mountford and Durdin turn our competitive losses into 100 point smashings? I'll give you a hint, it wouldn't. In fact, it might even make us a better side in the short term, turning a few of those close losses into wins, as well as undeniably making us better in the long term.
No it's not the best case scenario, we're persisting with old players who aren't contributing now and have no place in our future. If they were still alright now despite having little chance of being part of our future success then I don't have a problem with them being selected. ie. Gibson. It's not the best case scenario to pay lip service to a rebuild by giving debutantes one game then casting them to the curb, imploring they work on their deficiencies in the VFL while older players are given continued leeway to fix their limitations in the seniors.
Agreed, he should be judged on his record in the last 18 matches, which sits at 3 wins, his deplorable record in close matches, and his inability to hold on to 5 goal leads.
He should be judged on his garbage rhetoric where he blames a rookie team, despite the side he picks being nothing of the sort.
He should be judged on his last 8 years where he has had plenty of time to build a list yet couldn't coach a team to be consistently good enough throughout the Home and Away season to finish in a top 4 position and give us a genuine shot at a flag, despite finals performances demonstrating that the talent on the list was clearly there.
Ha ch Go is breaking up at my place and i can't understand a word they are saying so i guess I'll miss out on Scotts what a shame.Spare me, a reason not to watch! it will only be same old, same old, nothing new or worth listening to. has all the words, unfortunately nothing to back up, same when the players are interviewed, they say all the right & good things, but unable to back-up.
Tell someone who cares, what he says and what happens are 2 totally different things, what I am more concerned about is myself becoming so cynical, sorry everyone it appears that football (So-called modern) has exposed the cynic, hard to be realistic & put everything into perspective in 2017. So hard to be positive in relation to team decision-makers at the club.
Kodak Gaso? It's not 1986........I suspect they would be the first to pull out the Kodak and take a selfie.
Or was he Brad Scotting when he said that. Or does he mean he thinks we'd have a better win loss ratio and he'd be able to use that to get his next gig?He thinks those senior players would have got us closer to an "acceptable" season and given the board reason to feel we were moving in the "right" direction? Hmmmmm
Why does he think his employer would be happy with him rolling out a competitive team this year that was never really a flag chance and didn't get much experience into its youth?
Kodak Gaso? It's not 1986........
Scroll past the post. You don't have to watch them!
Scroll past the post. You don't have to watch them!
Tell someone who cares, what he says and what happens are 2 totally different things, what I am more concerned about is myself becoming so cynical, sorry everyone it appears that football (So-called modern) has exposed the cynic, hard to be realistic & put everything into perspective in 2017. So hard to be positive in relation to team decision-makers at the club.
Kodak Gaso? It's not 1986........