Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Differential between for an against is probably more relevant , though as dogs fans like to point out its not the total that matters anyway (easy to say when you kissed on the rear by umps)
That is from a quick count per the stats and shows the usual eagles and dogs at the top, carlton though geez umps must feel bad
1- Carlton 24 + frees more than given away
2- west coast 18+
3- Western Bulldogs 14+
4- north 12+
5 collingwood 10+
6 hawthorn 10+
7 Melbourne 6+
8- Port 6+
9- Brisbane 2+
10- Gold coast 1+
11- Essendon -4
12- fremantle -5
13- geelong. -9
14- sydney -12
15 GWS -14
16- adelaide -14
17- Stkilda. -18
18- Richmond -28....geez
Differential between for an against is probably more relevant , though as dogs fans like to point out its not the total that matters anyway (easy to say when you kissed on the rear by umps)
That is from a quick count per the stats and shows the usual eagles and dogs at the top, carlton though geez umps must feel bad
1- Carlton 24 + frees more than given away
2- west coast 18+
3- Western Bulldogs 14+
4- north 12+
5 collingwood 10+
6 hawthorn 10+
7 Melbourne 6+
8- Port 6+
9- Brisbane 2+
10- Gold coast 1+
11- Essendon -4
12- fremantle -5
13- geelong. -9
14- sydney -12
15 GWS -14
16- adelaide -14
17- Stkilda. -18
18- Richmond -28....geez
Context
Dogs and eagles get away with holding the ball and throws more than other teams, Geelong are shocking for holding off the ball without penalty, and to stop cats fans getting all antsy over a hawk fan, Hawks get away with arm chops a fair bit
This is how perceptions of clubs come about, not because of a positive or negative free kick count, but because different standards are held
Differential between for an against is probably more relevant , though as dogs fans like to point out its not the total that matters anyway (easy to say when you kissed on the rear by umps)
That is from a quick count per the stats and shows the usual eagles and dogs at the top, carlton though geez umps must feel bad
1- Carlton 24 + frees more than given away
2- west coast 18+
3- Western Bulldogs 14+
4- north 12+
5 collingwood 10+
6 hawthorn 10+
7 Melbourne 6+
8- Port 6+
9- Brisbane 2+
10- Gold coast 1+
11- Essendon -4
12- fremantle -5
13- geelong. -9
14- sydney -12
15 GWS -14
16- adelaide -14
17- Stkilda. -18
18- Richmond -28....geez
Did you watch the game or look at the free kick count only?Eagles play Tiges at the g.
Eagles ,a smorgasboard of frees.
Eagles play Hawks.
Hawks,a smorgasboard of frees.
It was 9 to 2 at one stage.Did you watch the game or look at the free kick count only?
Was never 9-2, couldn't have been because up until halfway through the second quarter it was eagles 4, Hawks 2It was 9 to 2 at one stage.
We couldn't buy a free.
No wonder Clarko made a big fuss over the one the Hawks didn't get.
Was never 9-2, couldn't have been because up until halfway through the second quarter it was eagles 4, Hawks 2
Nice try though
Half time scoreboard definitely was something like hawks 7 wce 2 (or even 9 to 2).
during the qtr shown stats can be delayed a bitI remember the board showing frees 4-2, wouldn't be the first time the mcg stats are different to the actual ones
But that's a measure of frees not paid rather than frees paid which the ladder shows. A lot harder to measure that because it requires a view (sometimes subjective) on whether a free should've been paid but wasn't. Don't know how you develop a stat for that.Dogs and eagles get away with holding the ball and throws more than other teams, Geelong are shocking for holding off the ball without penalty, and to stop cats fans getting all antsy over a hawk fan, Hawks get away with arm chops a fair bit
Agree with this. Would also be interesting if there were stats on which umpires pay which types of frees. Ideally any variation would be statistically insignificant but may draw out whether there are trends in which umps may be more prone to paying some frees than others.A percentage of total frees paid in games you play would probably be even more telling, but would probably need more than 5 games to have a real difference over the basic +/- differential. Doing it quickly, it only swaps North and Collingwood from the differential list.
Pretty sure we won the count on Monday so closed the gap18- Richmond -28....geez
I remember once watching those 'Last 2 minutes' replays of a close game the AFL website put up. I was neutral - it wasn't a Richmond game.
Just for fun, I decided to look at what frees COULD have been paid. I reckon I saw at least 6 incidents where the umps could have blown the whistle - both ways - nothing really blatant stood out (at least from the angle the TV camera was). There was at least one free paid - yeah, I suppose it was there. We have a very, very subjective game as far as rules enforcement goes. Don't like it? - don't watch it, then.
Umpiring is like the funny-shaped ball we use. It's part of the game - sometimes it bounces your way in a close finish. If you try and rationalise it any other way - or worse, invent some conspiracy theory - you will never come to peace with it. It's been that way for ever, and always will be.
Well done on the Swans winning the free kick count on Saturday.Differential between for an against is probably more relevant , though as dogs fans like to point out its not the total that matters anyway (easy to say when you kissed on the rear by umps)
That is from a quick count per the stats and shows the usual eagles and dogs at the top, carlton though geez umps must feel bad
1- Carlton 24 + frees more than given away
2- west coast 18+
3- Western Bulldogs 14+
4- north 12+
5 collingwood 10+
6 hawthorn 10+
7 Melbourne 6+
8- Port 6+
9- Brisbane 2+
10- Gold coast 1+
11- Essendon -4
12- fremantle -5
13- geelong. -9
14- sydney -12
15 GWS -14
16- adelaide -14
17- Stkilda. -18
18- Richmond -28....geez
Yep probably the 3 umpires I least wanted to see named.West Coast are going to be in front by the end of the derby with the umpires assigned to the game.
The bounce of the ball might be a random factor but it doesn't change from quarter to quarter, game to game or year to year like the umpiring does.
The bounce of the ball also doesn't favour certain teams like the umpiring favours certain teams.
The bounce of the ball is a random factor without any bias or manipulation, the same can't be said for the umpiring unfortunately.
Did you watch the game or look at the free kick count only?
Differential between for an against is probably more relevant , though as dogs fans like to point out its not the total that matters anyway (easy to say when you kissed on the rear by umps)
That is from a quick count per the stats and shows the usual eagles and dogs at the top, carlton though geez umps must feel bad
1- Carlton 24 + frees more than given away
2- west coast 18+
3- Western Bulldogs 14+
4- north 12+
5 collingwood 10+
6 hawthorn 10+
7 Melbourne 6+
8- Port 6+
9- Brisbane 2+
10- Gold coast 1+
11- Essendon -4
12- fremantle -5
13- geelong. -9
14- sydney -12
15 GWS -14
16- adelaide -14
17- Stkilda. -18
18- Richmond -28....geez
Nice bit of umpiring favouring St Kilda on the weekend winning the free kick count 17 to 10. I don't expect any comment from you on this but it would be wonderful if hawthorn could get the sort of run that St Kilda seems get week in week out.