tony dragun
Team Captain
- Aug 7, 2017
- 367
- 161
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Banned
- #3,701
and then insulting homosexuals.
Really?? I mean really?
This is why this place is a bubble. The internet forum of the ABC.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and then insulting homosexuals.
He said we know it's genuine.Great logic there - someone isn't genuine about something because he couldn't spell it, LOL. Big Footy, never, ever, ever change. The gift that keeps on giving.
It's not a spelling nazi. Please see above.Spelling nazi. Has no idea if the anecdote posted is true or not. Assumes untrue. But the Gays.
I don't know. I honestly don't know what the last 6 of those acronyms are. But I'm sure they want to get married too.
Bradesmaen, Bradesmaen, Bradesmaen.No. My point was he joined this place under the guise of a football supporter just to post a no vote without explaining his reasoning and then crying foul for people continuously asking for his reasoning and then insulting homosexuals.
If you don't like it, why did you ******* join? You've joined a football forum and posted in Gay Marriage, Tony Abbott, Donald Trump, Feminism and probably one other thread.Really?? I mean really?
This is why this place is a bubble. The internet forum of the ABC.
You asked what gave me the right to class you? How is that not claiming that...?No. Didn't claim that at all.
You Yes people are so defensive, but name calling and childish antics just make you look really silly....
Yeah, but they are all stoned.....16 years of SSM in the Netherlands. Nothing has changed. The world has not ended. They can't marry children, they can't marry animals, they can't marry trees. Seriously the arguments of the no side are very weak and insulting. I have no problems if they vote no because they through their own beliefs (religious or otherwise) do not believe in marriage outside of a man and a woman, but to insinuate that Gay marriage will bring about apocalypse and beastiality is just pathetic and straw grasping.
That's your opinion. It's wrong, but you can have it. I don't do it to stir s**t, I post because thats what I believe. Like others. Except my opinions are not insulting, racist or bigoted.Bradesmaen, Bradesmaen, Bradesmaen.
Everyone knows that you just join posts to stir s**t, you've been doing it forever......
He said we know it's genuine.
He jumped into a discussion about SSM to tell everyone he disagrees then threw in that he knows gays and that AIDS killed someone close to him, to bignote an opinion. If you want to believe everything strangers claim online that's fine, most people look at context to judge things though.
So you're saying if we legalise marijuana at the same time, all will be okay?Yeah, but they are all stoned.....
What's wrong with "doing good" by the way?So you all know, what I posted was honest and genuine, your replies have only reinforced my personal opinions of nuff nuffs, dogooders and idiots, you will never be happy until everyone agrees with your opinions and lifestyles.
Sorry.You asked what gave me the right to class you? How is that not claiming that...?
Again, what did I call you?
If you don't like it, why did you ******* join? You've joined a football forum and posted in Gay Marriage, Tony Abbott, Donald Trump, Feminism and probably one other thread.
Did you fail Kinder Garden.....So you're saying if we legalise marijuana at the same time, all will be okay?
Yet they still can't identify a 3rd gender outside of someone "Identifying."You mean like how science had settled that the earth was flat... oh wait. Things can change. Climate science is changing, but in all science they are down the right path with minor changes.
You've literally ignored all that was posted and said "yeah but you picked on spelling!"And most don't claim someone isn't genuine just because they cannot spell. What sh*tty logic that is.
What's wrong with "doing good" by the way?
Is your preference to wreak harm?
Well I understand satire and ellipses, so no.Did you fail Kinder Garden.....
I'm not. I was simply pointing out.. why the * did you join if you thought this place was a bubble and that you have no posted once on the Fremantle forum. If your interest in Fremantle has waned, why did you even join this year?As a fellow Fremantle supporter you'd understand why my interest has waned this season. But do not tell me what threads to post in.
Good to see Tabs named.
They are actually. Very much so.That's your opinion. It's wrong, but you can have it. I don't do it to stir s**t, I post because thats what I believe. Like others. Except my opinions are not insulting, racist or bigoted.
Roy Morgan Poll.
Analysing the results by voting preference shows a majority of supporters of all parties except Family First support gay people having the right to get married.
Analysis by Gender
- Liberal voters: Approve (59%) cf. disapprove (41%);
- National voters: Approve (67%) cf. disapprove (33%);
- ALP voters: Approve (88%) cf. disapprove (12%);
- Greens voters: Approve (97%) cf. disapprove (3%);
- Family First voters: Approve (49%) cf. disapprove (51%);
- Independent/ Others voters: Approve (68%) cf. disapprove (32%).
Analysis by gender shows a large gender split with a greater majority of women approving of the right of gay people to get married:
Analysis by Age
- Men: Approve (69%) cf. disapprove (31%);
- Women: Approve (84%) cf. disapprove (16%).
Analysing by age shows a majority of all age groups approving of the right of gay people to get married with younger people far more supportive:
Analysis by State
- 18-24yr olds: Approve (94%) cf. disapprove (6%);
- 25-34yr olds: Approve (83%) cf. disapprove (17%);
- 35-49yr olds: Approve (78%) cf. disapprove (22%);
- 50-64yr olds: Approve (72%) cf. disapprove (28%);
- 65+yr olds: Approve (66%) cf. disapprove (34%).
Analysing by State shows clear majorities in all Australian States approving of the right of gay people to get married:
- New South Wales: Approve (75%) cf. disapprove (25%);
- Victoria: Approve (82%) cf. disapprove (18%);
- Queensland: Approve (76%) cf. disapprove (24%);
- Western Australia: Approve (73%) cf. disapprove (27%);
- South Australia: Approve (73%) cf. disapprove (27%);
- Tasmania: Approve (77%) cf. disapprove (23%).
So you did do exactly what I suggested (pretty clear since I even quoted you), now you're throwing out non-sequitursSorry.
I'll resort to replying to posters who have an opinion.....
You post like a school boy....
I'm not. I was simply pointing out.. why the **** did you join if you thought this place was a bubble and that you have no posted once on the Fremantle forum. If your interest in Fremantle has waned, why did you even join this year?