Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Trade & F.A. 2017 (if a scenario sounds wrong - read on before posting)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
A bit harsh. Runner up in our B&F in his first year at the club and fairly strong this year. Second best player behind Pendlebury at Collingwood. More than handy and I think he can get better.
He gets a good run at it most weeks he doesn't even cop a tag. He should be taking the pressure of Pendlebury by taking the tag but he isn't seen damaging enough to tag. He is a good player but not good enough to warrant pick 7 x2
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Just because the club does a bad job doesn't mean you jump off them. We over paid to get him, like we paid more than Geelong did for Danger. More than Brisbane paid for Beams. Treloar wasn't/isn't worth more than those blokes
 
I have said for a while that Moore would be a superstar at CHB.

I've read Lever is the next Rance. Thats ridiculous. Lever just doesnt have that level of athleticism. Few do.

Moore does.

The thing that sets Rance apart from most KPD's is his pace. Neither Moore or Lever are close to matching that.
 
Think we need to face the fact it will be a very quiet trade period for us.

Hearing we're not in contention for Saad, it will be Carlton or Bombers.

If Dees are steadfast in getting rid of Watts, He will probably come to us unless he gets his head around moving interstate.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I just want it on the record that i do not share everyone's obsession about landing Lynch. He will cost the world and to me he is just a very good player.

People talk like he is a mutation of Buddy, Coleman and Carey.

Getting him will not buy us a flag imho.

He had a very lean year in 2017 but still managed to kick 44 goals in 19 games, which is more than any of our forwards this year. If we pick him up as a free agent next year how is that costing the world if we have money to spend? Won't buy us a flag but will certainly get us closer. Lynch is exactly the player we need.
 
Gee Seeds not happy with fourth in the brownlow, clearly injured this year. He is a jet and will be that for next half a dozen years
So we paid a higher price than the Cats did for Danger and if you want to use Brownlow votes as an indicator Danger has got 68 over the past two years Treloar 33.
 
Easy to say you wouldn't swap him now but Curnow will be a better player. Treloar has been an underwhelming recruit
Just because the club does a bad job doesn't mean you jump off them. We over paid to get him, like we paid more than Geelong did for Danger. More than Brisbane paid for Beams. Treloar wasn't/isn't worth more than those blokes

No but wats something they have done thats atleast ok.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

its turned into comedy hour at the dogs. they are now saying if they don't get a decent pick for stringer they'll keep him. a pick in 20s wont work.

this after Bob Murphy said there is zero chance he will be there next year.

would be hilarious if they refuse to trade him and he goes on leave for stress and sits out his contract.
 
Last edited:
Saad apparently nominating Essendon

Wow if the bombers get Saad (and Stringer) they are really in good shape. The pace in their list is already excellent plus adding Saad... frightening.
 
Given the bad publicity regarding Harry O and some cultural insensitivities and Saad's muslim background, can you really blame him?
Ridiculous assumption
 
So we paid a higher price than the Cats did for Danger and if you want to use Brownlow votes as an indicator Danger has got 68 over the past two years Treloar 33.
Go home factor with Danger. So you are basically saying because cats got Danger for a super bargain that anyone that pays market price for a jet has paid overs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom