- Joined
- Jan 12, 2011
- Posts
- 25,417
- Reaction score
- 35,614
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
...and circulate his picture to the local TABEssendon better alert the local high schools....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

...and circulate his picture to the local TABEssendon better alert the local high schools....
He gets a good run at it most weeks he doesn't even cop a tag. He should be taking the pressure of Pendlebury by taking the tag but he isn't seen damaging enough to tag. He is a good player but not good enough to warrant pick 7 x2A bit harsh. Runner up in our B&F in his first year at the club and fairly strong this year. Second best player behind Pendlebury at Collingwood. More than handy and I think he can get better.
https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/af...k=b9d521665d1d791d16c89fc8e17d9932-1507161480
Looks like the Bombers are trying to beef up their forward line.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I wasn't think we are OK, I think Saad would be a better get needs wise.I wasn't overly keen on Smith anyway to be honest.
I have said for a while that Moore would be a superstar at CHB.
I've read Lever is the next Rance. Thats ridiculous. Lever just doesnt have that level of athleticism. Few do.
Moore does.
Gee Seeds not happy with fourth in the brownlow, clearly injured this year. He is a jet and will be that for next half a dozen yearsEasy to say you wouldn't swap him now but Curnow will be a better player. Treloar has been an underwhelming recruit
The thing that sets Rance apart from most KPD's is his pace. Neither Moore or Lever are close to matching that.
Saad apparently nominating Essendon
I just want it on the record that i do not share everyone's obsession about landing Lynch. He will cost the world and to me he is just a very good player.
People talk like he is a mutation of Buddy, Coleman and Carey.
Getting him will not buy us a flag imho.
Losing out on Saad would be a disaster, he is exactly what we need.
So we paid a higher price than the Cats did for Danger and if you want to use Brownlow votes as an indicator Danger has got 68 over the past two years Treloar 33.Gee Seeds not happy with fourth in the brownlow, clearly injured this year. He is a jet and will be that for next half a dozen years
Easy to say you wouldn't swap him now but Curnow will be a better player. Treloar has been an underwhelming recruit
Just because the club does a bad job doesn't mean you jump off them. We over paid to get him, like we paid more than Geelong did for Danger. More than Brisbane paid for Beams. Treloar wasn't/isn't worth more than those blokes
We overcapitalised in Treloar and it will hurt us in the long run. It's easy to say it's a good thing now because he has given more than a first and second year playerNo but wats something they have done thats atleast ok.
Saad apparently nominating Essendon
Ridiculous assumptionGiven the bad publicity regarding Harry O and some cultural insensitivities and Saad's muslim background, can you really blame him?
Go home factor with Danger. So you are basically saying because cats got Danger for a super bargain that anyone that pays market price for a jet has paid overs.So we paid a higher price than the Cats did for Danger and if you want to use Brownlow votes as an indicator Danger has got 68 over the past two years Treloar 33.
