Review 2017 Free Agency & Trade Period

[Nightrain]

Rookie elevations aren't done using ND picks anymore. It's a separate process.

That's news to me. So what's the process now?

 

[Purpellian Anchor]

Rookie elevations aren't done using ND picks anymore. It's a separate process.

So 82 is like putting parsley on top the soup....just looks good

 

[Nickos66]

Grey is already on the senior list.

He was dropped back to the rookie last with Deluca this time last year, and upgraded to the senior list midseason due to seniors on the LTI. He's still a rookie.

 

[Nickos66]

So 82 is like putting parsley on top the soup....just looks good

82 for Luke Hodge. Amirite?

 

[wayToGo_]

That's news to me. So what's the process now?

Clubs get to elevate any rookies on their list from that season without all the stupid late pick rubbish. Picks haven't been used for rookie elevations since 2013

 

[meima]

Rookie elevations aren't done using ND picks anymore. It's a separate process.

Where the rules I Google it but can't find anything on it .

 

[Dirty_banchez]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That would have been the worst trade ever. Of all time. In any place.

Dogs don't even have pick 23. They have 25.

Our recruiters do their best work with late picks!

Draft isn't as deep this year. Next year is very deep with extremely good top 10.

 

[Taylor]

Where the rules I Google it but can't find anything on it .

You can see an example of it here, from last year:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_AFL_draft#Rookie_elevations

Before, there would have been a passed pick, then the next pick starts listing rookie list players as they are elevated. Now it's just players taken as picks.

 

[Nightrain]

Clubs get to elevate any rookies on their list from that season without all the stupid late pick rubbish. Picks haven't been used for rookie elevations since 2013

FMD I have been living under a rock. Thanks

 

[Righteo]

I would prefer either of Matera or Hamling to Crozier if that is a way of measuring things. Partly due to our needs, whereas Crozier has struggled to define a role for us. I hope he does well.

I can see him being next years Jeremy Howe if he plays permanently back. Oh well, I like the Dogs so I hope he does well and I'm confident we'll do good things with pick 40

 

[Eski3]

I can see him being next years Jeremy Howe if he plays permanently back. Oh well, I like the Dogs so I hope he does well and I'm confident we'll do good things with pick 40

To be honest Howe showed more at Melbourne than Crozier did at Freo, if he does a Howe it would be a surprise

 

[valkorum]

He was dropped back to the rookie last with Deluca this time last year, and upgraded to the senior list midseason due to seniors on the LTI. He's still a rookie.

Nope, confirmed by Freo on twitter last week that Grey is on the senior list.

Look up the tweet about Sheridan and Grey re-signing... its a reply under there (6 days ago)

 

[wayToGo_]

Where the rules I Google it but can't find anything on it .

I'm sure it'd be in the big AFL rules document somewhere but this Wikipedia snippet covers it:

Between 2009 and 2013, rookie listed players that were elevated to their club's senior list were listed in the national draft order at the end of the club's selections. In 2014 the AFL reverted to the system used in 2008 and earlier, where they are not included in the draft list. Club can retain a rookie for up to three years before they must be elevated to the senior list or delisted.

 

[Righteo]

To be honest Howe showed more at Melbourne than Crozier did at Freo, if he does a Howe it would be a surprise

Yeah it's more the vibe of it

 

[meima]

You can see an example of it here, from last year:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_AFL_draft#Rookie_elevations

Before, there would have been a passed pick, then the next pick starts listing rookie list players as they are elevated. Now it's just players taken as picks.

So that mean club can easily treat it as minimum 3 pick . I wonder Hawthorn did that last year .

 

[mightymouse75]

Can see Balic being taken in the pre season and us paying overs for matera and wilson. Paranoid ??

 

[Purpellian Anchor]

I can see him being next years Jeremy Howe if he plays permanently back. Oh well, I like the Dogs so I hope he does well and I'm confident we'll do good things with pick 40

Pick 40&41&83 for Wilson and pick 65 Id say.

 

[Dirty_banchez]

Can see Balic being taken in the pre season and us paying overs for matera and wilson. Paranoid ??

PSD threats never amount to anything. Teams don't want to piss off potential future trading partners.

 

[Wizard]

Can see Balic being taken in the pre season and us paying overs for matera and wilson. Paranoid ??

Yep.

We generally do a pretty good job in getting value at the trade table.

Balic may end up going cheap but would be surprised if we get bent over in Wilson or Matera.

 

[Docker82]

Only player that could go PSD is Hodge. Wouldn't be surprised if the AFL ask the two clubs to make the trade not happen just to justify the PSD's existence. Won't get used any other way. Clubs will just make their players DFAs these days when there's little to gain in way of trade value especially when trade period is over.

 

[Eski3]

Can see Balic being taken in the pre season and us paying overs for matera and wilson. Paranoid ??

There is literally no indication whatsoever that that is going to happen

 

[Eski3]

Just realised that Steven Motlop signed with Port for the same deal as Chris Mayne

 

[Tundrawolf]

PSD threats never amount to anything. Teams don't want to piss off potential future trading partners.

Tell that to GWS.

 

[Dirty_banchez]

So Bullies wanted pick 5 for a midfielder. It could be Brayshaw or Cerra.

Glad we didn't trade it.

 

[Dirty_banchez]

Tell that to GWS.

GWS don't count because everybody already hates them.