Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice 45th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 3

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lol relying on a 10 year old assessment, sounds like a logical and creditable assessment. o_O

Just ******* LOL

Haha, what you are missing is that even a clear minded innocent 10yr old can clearly see Wolff is a liar. So why can't you?
So what did you see when you watched his interview ... a fellow anti-Trumper full of credibility? Now that would be belly laughs.

The Wolff interview did nothing for anybody using his book for anti-Trump material and Wolff would have been better off staying out of the public eye.
 
Haha, what you are missing is that even a clear minded innocent 10yr old can clearly see Wolff is a liar. So why can't you?
So what did you see when you watched his interview ... a fellow anti-Trumper full of credibility? Now that would be belly laughs.

The Wolff interview did nothing for anybody using his book for anti-Trump material and Wolff would have been better off staying out of the public eye.
You’re too stupid to even argue with
 
Haha, what you are missing is that even a clear minded innocent 10yr old can clearly see Wolff is a liar. So why can't you?
So what did you see when you watched his interview ... a fellow anti-Trumper full of credibility? Now that would be belly laughs.

The Wolff interview did nothing for anybody using his book for anti-Trump material and Wolff would have been better off staying out of the public eye.

So if i get a 10 year old to watch a Trump interview, and that 10 year old thinks that Donald is a liar too, you will concede that it must be fact?

Or if I get that 10 year old to read Trump's tweets and the 10 year old pisses themselves laughing and says that the author is deranged, well it must be the case, right?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

So if i get a 10 year old to watch a Trump interview, and that 10 year old thinks that Donald is a liar too, you will concede that it must be fact?

Or if I get that 10 year old to read Trump's tweets and the 10 year old pisses themselves laughing and says that the author is deranged, well it must be the case, right?

I've witnessed two seven year old kids playing together, one accused the other of lying and the accuser told the apparent liar, "You sound like Donald Trump."

Make of that what you will... :eek: :D
 
You’re too stupid to even argue with
In the interests of science I'm going to write liar and not liar on two bits of paper, put a bit of food on each and see which one my kitties pick. Will report findings.
 
Haha, what you are missing is that even a clear minded innocent 10yr old can clearly see Wolff is a liar. So why can't you?
So what did you see when you watched his interview ... a fellow anti-Trumper full of credibility? Now that would be belly laughs.

The Wolff interview did nothing for anybody using his book for anti-Trump material and Wolff would have been better off staying out of the public eye.

Btw, while analysing Wolff, did you also conclude that he has a gay face?
 
Sorry, you've missed my meaning. Where has international policy changed from when the US had someone competent in charge? Climate change policy is much the same. The main thing that changed is America withdrawing from the TPP, so that's obviously the US still having influence, but additionally plenty of countries are still going ahead with a new agreement. I think the US may have hinted at altering energy policy, but again, that's due to Trump-Russia. So I'm not seeing much evidence for your claim.

The idea that all these countries are in thrall to the US is a lie. The USA, especially under the Republicans, have many 'priorities' that aren't supported. You mention Israel? Ever looked at how UN votes go on Israel? It's often just the US and Israel. Maybe a few times countries like Australia have joined for reasons you could call sycophancy. Is that what you're actually trying to say here? You are focussed primarily on Israel when talking about global affairs?

The other major issue that you might be thinking of would be the China v USA approach to regional politics, but then you go and say "The Chinese influence in our politics is negligent". So presumably you think there is little change politically in that arena.

EDIT: Just saw your follow-up post, particularly your comment on China. I don't think you're across geopolitics well at all.
The poster is biased towards the Chinese position and therefore likely Chinese or has no idea. Your guess is as good as mine.
 
Are you dictating the Coalition's foreign policy?

Why would not being threatened by China make me Chinese? Are you American?
Please tell me more about the conflict in the South China Sea, I’m enthralled.
I don’t care who you’re threatened by.
No I’m Australian, but I travel.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Who's the publisher of this book, and who'll end up making a lot of money from it?

But wait, Trump's supporters always tell us that the polls are fake news and that he actually has massive support.

So if that were the case, wouldn't a book praising his amazingness be a huge hit amongst this apparent majority, and a book saying he is a dunce be a huge flop?

Or do you concede that more people hate Trump than like him?
 
But wait, Trump's supporters always tell us that the polls are fake news and that he actually has massive support.

So if that were the case, wouldn't a book praising his amazingness be a huge hit amongst this apparent majority, and a book saying he is a dunce be a huge flop?

Or do you concede that more people hate Trump than like him?
He is definitely a polarising figure!
 
But wait, Trump's supporters always tell us that the polls are fake news and that he actually has massive support.

So if that were the case, wouldn't a book praising his amazingness be a huge hit amongst this apparent majority, and a book saying he is a dunce be a huge flop?

Or do you concede that more people hate Trump than like him?
I don't like Trump as a start, but love how triggered everyone gets regarding him. It was just a question really. The book looks like it's against him, judging by his tweets, so I was wondering who's profiting off it? Does money lead back to the Clinton foundation?
 
In the interests of science I'm going to write liar and not liar on two bits of paper, put a bit of food on each and see which one my kitties pick. Will report findings.

Always knew you were a closeted cats fan. Are they called Gazza and Danger?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The poster is biased towards the Chinese position and therefore likely Chinese or has no idea. Your guess is as good as mine.
There's a pretty big logic flaw here. He could just as easily be anti-US than pro-Chinese and therefore imagining his 'US only one wrong' scenario. I doubt he is Chinese given the lack of detail and understanding. Anti-Americanism is very common.
 
Always knew you were a closeted cats fan. Are they called Gazza and Danger?
Freddie and Fergus, they're ginger toms so we wanted Scottish names. They're only six months old so they're stupidly cute.
 
I don't like Trump as a start, but love how triggered everyone gets regarding him. It was just a question really. The book looks like it's against him, judging by his tweets, so I was wondering who's profiting off it? Does money lead back to the Clinton foundation?

The publisher is German owned. Obviously it is a Clinton/Merkel collaboration.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom