Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Ps. Thanks for Gibbs
Next week should be a close game lol.
You’re welcome, after you blokes finally ponying up a reasonable trade offer ... a year too late it looks like.
Fairly sure it was about 500k we offered. Lever will never be able to live up to his price tag and it will take money off of team mates who are more deserving.What did the crows offer him? Less than half that amount?
What would you have done?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
No I didn't!You just celebrated the club doing an incredibly pwtty thing which Im sure has troubled Gunston every day since.
Its one thing to Google yourself. Its another thing to farm likes from strangers.
No I didn't!
I didn't agree with what the club did.
Again, this was not a supporter decision as originally suggested.
Lever asked Adelaide to match the Dees offer.Who has stated that Lever asked Adelaide to match the offer and he'll stay?
That incorrect.It was a collective "you". The supporters on the whole agreed.
"In terms of the money, what I can say is other clubs have offered more money than us for him to return to Victoria. It's within our pay scale and we are really comfortable with the offer we made," Mahoney said.Lever asked Adelaide to match the Dees offer.
It's on the public record by his manager.
Crows said no as would mean he would be our highest paid player.
No but judging by the responses on the first few pages of this thread I think it's pretty obvious who has the most venom for him.Do we know Jake is being targeted specifically by Crows supporters?
What would you do if you were offered an additional $1m over 3 years?Fairly sure it was about 500k we offered. Lever will never be able to live up to his price tag and it will take money off of team mates who are more deserving.
No but judging by the responses on the first few pages of this thread I think it's pretty obvious who has the most venom for him.
I have no issue with what the Dees offered. You made it attractive for him to move clubs, he got back to his home state & were more than fair compensating the Crows with draft picks."In terms of the money, what I can say is other clubs have offered more money than us for him to return to Victoria. It's within our pay scale and we are really comfortable with the offer we made," Mahoney said.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-10-04/lever-set-to-attend-crows-bf-says-manager
Public record, I haven't seen itLever asked Adelaide to match the Dees offer.
It's on the public record by his manager.
Crows said no as would mean he would be our highest paid player.
The grand final was last year. Get over it
Maybe he thinks Melbourne is more likely to win a premiership than Adelaide?
Jake will be a long term star for Melbourne
Not really. We are all too busy laughing our asses at off at Melbourne. You're not going to find too many people who regret losing a player who's stinking it up at his new club while being criminally overpaid.
I'm willing to admit I'm salty about losing Cameron and Lyons the year before. Lever though?![]()
Lever is awesome though, need to sign him up long term.
Your welcome. And thanks for looking like basically giving back our pick 16 in a stronger draft this yearYou’re welcome, after you blokes finally ponying up a reasonable trade offer ... a year too late it looks like.
Genuine LOL.I'm not a brilliant detective, but if you plug the word Lever and your username into search, this comes up from May 5 last year.