Play Nice 45th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 6 - It begins. (cont in pt 7)

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Media outlets are using the terminology they are because it is easier and simpler than wading into the minutiae of what specific part of the accreditation, that the WH controls, has been cancelled - end result is the same, he can no longer enter the WH. As I said recently, this victim hood complex is truly something to behold.

Heh, knew you'd come up with a rationale for the fake news.

Look, I'm just pleased you did the research and corrected the earlier BS assertions.
There's something to be said for staying in the adult ego state.
 
I wonder when the U.S media & it's Journo's are going to start sticking up for Julian Assange, for the crime of publishing the truth.....I don't hear the Donald claiming him as a font of 'fake-news' & yet, he's gone to all that trouble to have him silenced anyway.

Where are all these voices of moral outrage at the treatment of Assange I wonder?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Thought it was specific “I did not put hands on her”
Video shows forearm contact not hand

(See we can all split semantics)
Maybe his arm does not identify as his body. It is its own independent creature not associated with its connection to the Acosta body. Therefore he didn't really touch her with his own actions!
 
I really can’t believe you had to go to these lengths to explain this. This is some crazy arse internet right there..
Insane innit. Pretty sure she's just trolling at this point, nobody could be that disconnected from reality.

By saying that his "hard pass" giving him unescorted access to WH had been suspended.

Yeah that's a punchy headline for sure, can't imagine why all and sundry didn't go for that lol

Heh, knew you'd come up with a rationale for the fake news.

Look, I'm just pleased you did the research and corrected the earlier BS assertions.
There's something to be said for staying in the adult ego state.

Pretty sure Fox doesn't do fake news unless its in support of Trump. The fact they are using the same terminology tells you all you need to know.

I notice you've ignored the other part of my post explaining how the accreditation works. No probs, I'd wanna back away slowly at this point too :thumbsu:
 
Misleading to average it out, which is offset by the years when they won seats. The more relevant stat is the average seats lost in midterms by a party who holds the whitehouse, which is 34. So the result was quite normal.
Historically, as Quora says, Republicans do much better at mid-terms. That’s the fairer comparison.
 
Maybe his arm does not identify as his body. It is its own independent creature not associated with its connection to the Acosta body. Therefore he didn't really touch her with his own actions!
Meant the technicality of forearm not hand but whatever; point being both sides will play semantic bullshit (viz posts about karate chop)
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Wut o_O

Case could actually be made Sessions did more for Trump's and GOP's agenda than any other, certainly re: immigration and border security. Was also the first senator to endorse Trump for president, the only presidential endorsement he made over almost 2 decades as a senator. "Against Trump since day 1"? Pretty much the exact opposite.

We all know the problem - recusing himself from the Mueller investigation, and Trump's inability to get over it.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/08/us/politics/sessions-trump-justice-department-legacy.html

http://podbay.fm/show/1057255460/e/1541632683?autostart=1 (14 minutes in)

Jeff Flake is the senator from Arizona, being replaced by Sinema in the new year he's consistently anti-Trump.
 
It is unrelated to Trump unless the woman making the accusations works for the Trump organisation or the WH. But anyway, if you want to play this game...

You keep using the word 'wife beater' yet every article I have seen is described as 'domestic violence'.

Wife as Satan has pointed out denies it and and states that she has not known him to be violent.
If he is found guilty of charges then he will deserve what he gets.

Good to see that you are concerned about violence against women though.

Edit:
Avenatti has become a household name because of Trump's actions back then and Trump fans are quick to discredit him because the way he has played Trump at his own game.:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

Yeah the accusation was that he beat his wife at the time, it's since come out since that she says that is untrue, something happened we will wait and see.

I definitely am concerned about violence against women when it occurs, I'm especially glad that you are concerned with due process I have to say i thought you made it clear during the Kavanaugh hearings that we should believe women and the men must prove innocence.
 
Answer this question. Did he touch her or not?

Are we really still grinding over this furphy?

There was incidental contact brought about by her actions.....No jury would hold up any conviction for that.
 
Yeah the accusation was that he beat his wife at the time, it's since come out since that she says that is untrue, something happened we will wait and see.

I definitely am concerned about violence against women when it occurs, I'm especially glad that you are concerned with due process I have to say i thought you made it clear during the Kavanaugh hearings that we should believe women and the men must prove innocence.
At what time? I have no idea what you are on about. Is it not the recent article you were discussing or do you follow him and have evidence of another time he was charged/convicted?

Sorry, but I don't follow his every move or every time his name is in the media.

Re: Kavanaugh? Interesting way with words you have but anyway... I didn't believe him and there wasn't 'due process' in my opinion.
 
Are we really still grinding over this furphy?

There was incidental contact brought about by her actions.....No jury would hold up any conviction for that.
I've stated that when it happened. The man himself refused to acknowledge that he did touch her, something seen quite easily in the video. He's lying, yet we are suppose to trust his pieces of journalism?
 
I've stated that when it happened. The man himself refused to acknowledge that he did touch her, something seen quite easily in the video. He's lying, yet we are suppose to trust his pieces of journalism?

He's a reporter for a U.S MSM outlet....Anyone who trusts one of them nowadays deserves all the mockery that's coming to them.....And that includes Fox.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top