Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Has he had a tag yet?
Mitchell is a Melbourne boy.Haven't w.a produced some talent recently
Jaeger, sir Tom Mitchell, Harley bennell, David swallow, off the top of my head. Might aswell throw in hogan and jack martin in aswell
Or both.Yep, just be happy if your team has one of them
Mitchell has been the matchwinner plenty more times than O'Meara has been. To date it's not even close between those twoWhat a cheeky bump!
O'Meara, without even really thinking too hard. Matchwinner versus the ultimate accumulator. I know who I'd take pretty much every time.
To date.Mitchell has been the matchwinner plenty more times than O'Meara has been. To date it's not even close between those two
Mitchell by far.Mitchell has been the matchwinner plenty more times than O'Meara has been. To date it's not even close between those two
If Mitchell keeps playing at his current level he'll be one of the most decorated players in AFL history. O'Meara really needs to step up his game to catch upTo date.
Question isn't, "Whose career would I take to this point?"
O'Meara has plenty of time, and is capable of the impossible.If Mitchell keeps playing at his current level he'll be one of the most decorated players in AFL history. O'Meara really needs to step up his game to catch up
What you call flashy most people call effective. Dusty & Danger aren't more flashy with their disposals, they're more effectiveJust because Mitchell doesn't have the X-factor of a Martin or Danger doesn't mean he isn't a champion like those guys. I'd have Mitchell in the champion category. I don't get why people need to be flashy or have some X-Factor to be an AFL champion. If Ben Cunnington didn't look like the average 40 year old dad and instead had an odd haircut and tattoos like dusty, we'd all rate him. Martin and Danger are no better than Cripps, Mitchell etc. They have exciting traits like explosiveness, Fend-offs etc that make the media jizz. Just because Mitchells best trait is finding the footy which isnt that exciting, he gets lowered by the public. Both Mitchell and Danger hack the ball forward except when Danger does it, he explodes out of the centre like a bull. When Mitchell does it, he gets the hard ball and hacks it and it doesnt look as exciting. Same impact, similar stat numbers but one looks more exciting doing what he does so he gets rated higher.
Effective disposals you say.What you call flashy most people call effective. Dusty & Danger aren't more flashy with their disposals, they're more effective
Won’t be “Shiel or Cogs?”threesixpio, do you think there is a “Wingard or Coniglio” thread?
What about what the people say in 2019?People still saying O'Meara in 2018 have no idea about footy.