Hello Kitty
Miss Kitty
Thanks MaxAgree 100% Kitty.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks MaxAgree 100% Kitty.
Mary Anne all day long, seeing that you mentioned itShipwrecked with Ginger and Mary Ann.
Nothing to complain about.
Yet, most people I’ve spoken to didn’t hear even a peep of a booSupposedly Geelong supporters were also booing Ablett according to bloody Jeff.
Lol did see that. He had the second worst DE of our team.Going on another stat rant here so yeah sorry.
For those who look up the stats, what exactly do you get out of them?
Guthrie apparently had 54% efficiency.
That means he was directly turning it over half the time he had the ball. Did anyone see that? It just didn't happen.
Why bother? They're good for umpires to look up after the game to do their Brownlow votes and that's all.
That's not quite true. People understand "effective disposal" as being "not a turnover/clanger" but that's not quite it.For those who look up the stats, what exactly do you get out of them?
Guthrie apparently had 54% efficiency.
That means he was directly turning it over half the time he had the ball. Did anyone see that? It just didn't happen.
Stoppage clearances... he had 3 (2 were handball receives)
MeneNgola had a fair few turnovers this week. What were his turnover stats?Lol did see that. He had the second worst DE of our team
Stats arent always accurate... as reflected in my Suoer Coach teamThat's not quite true. People understand "effective disposal" as being "not a turnover/clanger" but that's not quite it.
So, a 35m under-pressure hack out of a centre clearance to a 50/50 contest could be statistically ineffective, while still being a good kick.
- Effective handballs hit the target, for whatever definition we have of "hit"
- Kicks of >40m which hit a 50/50 contest or better are effective
- Kicks of <40m which result in the intended target taking possession are effective.
If you get a handball receive out of a clearance situation, then the clearance is automatically credited to the person who gave you the handball, not you.
Why on earth would u take Stanley out of Ruck no 1 where he is playing well, to a spot he has failed at many timesI love Esava but I'm sorry but he needs a run in the VFL... Come on to be honest he isn't what he is before that injury.... I'm not bagging him but he needs a run in the 2s to find some form...
Bring in Fort or Buzza or even Abbott and play Stanley CHF..
One thing is for rebound 50's, we have Stewart leading with 48, then the next highest are a couple on 18 if I remember correctly. Clark is doing okay in that respect for a youngster - might even be best of the rest right now. However Touhy will still give us more drive from back there. Not quite in the sense of running, bouncing, speed balling it out of there - but another good ball user back there who gets more than 10 touches a game will be handy to complement the rest. I also think while it isn't exactly a strength of Touhy's, he's still more solid defensively at this stage and will help reduce the amount of crumbing goals getting kicked against us from spills.
I do like Clark, but there's no huge rush to make him play the vast majority of games this season. 10-12 would still be a great first up year in my opinion.
Yeah I thought that's sort of how it would work.That's not quite true. People understand "effective disposal" as being "not a turnover/clanger" but that's not quite it.
So, a 35m under-pressure hack out of a centre clearance to a 50/50 contest could be statistically ineffective, while still being a good kick.
- Effective handballs hit the target, for whatever definition we have of "hit"
- Kicks of >40m which hit a 50/50 contest or better are effective
- Kicks of <40m which result in the intended target taking possession are effective.
If you get a handball receive out of a clearance situation, then the clearance is automatically credited to the person who gave you the handball, not you.
No idea ATSAM. I’m from NSW, so only know Kennett from AFL, not politics. He’s a politician first, with an agenda. Can’t hack losing, so stirs up irrelevant crap to create a storm in a tea cup.
Going on another stat rant here so yeah sorry.
For those who look up the stats, what exactly do you get out of them?
Guthrie apparently had 54% efficiency.
That means he was directly turning it over half the time he had the ball. Did anyone see that? It just didn't happen.
Why bother? They're good for umpires to look up after the game to do their Brownlow votes and that's all.
Does anyone have footage of Clarkson giving his players high 5s?
I'm one of his critics. He was allright, hardly say great but first game back.
54% actually seems a bit low to me but it's a bullshit stat anyway.
For a 26 yo? automatic best 22 player. Meh. Probably would rather Constable.
For a depth player earning his spot, yeah pretty good.
With his form we might die wondering again, we threw Mumford away as well as Hamling.
Thought Ryan had interest from other clubs before he was resigned?
They are rogue operators running their areas counter to CS’s plans. All credit goes to them, until we fail. Then all failures are CS’s responsibility.Don’t forget massive bouquet to Chris scott who is in charge of the overall plan. Enright and Scarlett just implement what he puts in place.
Not many have mentioned Dahlhaus’s pressure in the forward half. Really elite stuff.
That will build over time as the team becomes confident in the brand that they are playing. Right now, their focus is executing their roles. Sooner or later this will become instinctive and they will punish opponents by anticipating their teammates better and therefore reacting faster. This in turn will make the team more fluid and dynamic, which will look like a real killer instinct in some matches.I sort of agree with this, I don’t think it was a great performance. We lacked a killer instinct every time we had our foot on their throat. It was professional, but not impressive.
There were some great individual highlights to enjoy which made it a good day out nonetheless.
When he sees an opening, he just goes. Doesn’t even hesitate.Not in the same way. Clark's far more of a linebreaker.
Guthrie was ok yesterday, stuck some good tackles but efficiency was low @54% and he's still not able to impact stoppages enough as a midfielder.
We’re we fortunate that Parfitt got injured? Selwood went absolutely berserk absorbing the kids midfield time.