The costs of the hubs would far exceed what at the time would have been only a possible future decision to allow crowds in.
The initial decision was the right one
-
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
News Conor McKenna tests positive for COVID-19 - Wait, what?
- Thread starter rumply
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
The costs of the hubs would far exceed what at the time would have been only a possible future decision to allow crowds in.
The initial decision was the right one
Unfortunately or fortunately whichever way you look at it footy is not that important.
The politicians said at the time they would negotiate with the AFL re that and, corporate box, numbers of possible supporters, 4sqm rules, cost etc. The AFL flat out said no before being prepared to even look at it. The Vic teams refused at the time, to travel over and go into 14 day quarantine.
Our Premier just farted in Victorias direction - In your face Gil.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
'i decide who other people are and aren't close with.
The best option based on the information provided was the one taken.
It may be that rhe best option in the next phase is the 10 Victorian clubs going in to hubs option given the persistent community infection
- Nov 21, 2013
- 8,454
- 6,934
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
They certainly think they are and that is a problem
No it was not the best option at the time, as argued by many at the time, including numerous figures outside of WA. Further it has gone on to be proven it was not the best option. It was a mistake!
- Nov 21, 2013
- 8,454
- 6,934
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Obviously he not very intelligent
Toump Ass
The Big Deal
- Jun 14, 2015
- 21,734
- 49,309
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide Power
Can't just see anyone you like and say you're close to them. After a few pints I'll dry hump a stranger, is that close enough for you?
(and for the record I'm sure Pickett was close to his friends too, but it was against the rules, he was suspended, and I wasn't sitting her whinging about it)
Wouldn’t want to be a Carlton player assigned to line up on an asymptomatic Essendon carrier.
Their funeral if Essendon win and then catch rona
- Jun 17, 2014
- 13,177
- 20,777
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- ASADA
Wow, what a mess up
So we still have inaccurate tests? Or just AFL sweeping this under and saying "he will follow 2-week isolation for to be safe (a.k.a, average time for Corona to leave the body)"
- Nov 21, 2013
- 8,454
- 6,934
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Possibly, broom, sweep rug?
Naah
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
In the context of the pandemic and a possible second wave in Victoria, do you really think this a "sweep under the rug" scenario?
The pandemic is bigger than the AFL or Essendon.
Toump Ass
The Big Deal
- Jun 14, 2015
- 21,734
- 49,309
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide Power
Gil's been on the phone to big boy Demitriou
"Nothing to see here!"
"Nothing to see here!"
Yeah, it's a big conspiracy from the department of out to get the NRL
Talks of potentially a false positive for McKenna was getting tested again today
Percel
Victorian’s love a good potato scallop
Source brother?
It's never been a secret the tests aren't totally accurate - https://www.labtestsonline.org.au/l...ions/covid-19/how-accurate-are-covid-19-tests
And as the tweet states, the Victorian Health Dept is undertaking the new test, not the AFL, making it impossible for some sort of AFL cover-up conspiracy.
Similar threads
